RE: SOTW: Peugeot 406 Coupe
RE: SOTW: Peugeot 406 Coupe
Friday 19th February 2010

SOTW: Peugeot 406 Coupe

Shed gets alliterative: this week it's Pininfarina pedigree for peanuts



Our imaginary £1k Shed of the Week budget can be a swine sometimes. And so it is with the Peugeot 406 Coupe - it's rare for an appropriate V6 example to come up for under a grand. There are countless ones for £1300, £1200 and even £1100 - but we're strict about this stuff at SOTW nowadays.

But our patience has now paid off - here it is, a nice SE-spec model in a decent colour (none of that 'flac jacket' yellow, please) with reasonable mileage, and it's on-budget. Check and mate, Monsieur Quatre-Cents-Six.

The 406 Coupe was launched in 1997 to mixed praise. But while opinions on the car's dynamic abilities varied, the interior was slated and most of the engines were labelled underpowered, one matter which attracted little disagreement was the styling.

Pininfarina had worked jointly with Fiat (and a certain Mr Bangle) to produce the Fiat Coupe two years earlier, but the rivalling 406 Coupe seems to have been a rather more committed Pininfarina design, and it shows. Well proportioned, with elegant lines and subtle detailing, the design looked great then and - we reckon, for such things are inevitably subjective - has aged brilliantly (provided you avoid the aforementioned yellow).


There was even a rumour at the time that Pinifarina had submitted a similar shape to Ferrari as a potential 'budget' model, but when faced with a flat rejection from Maranello at the whole idea, Pininfarina changed the shape and managed to flog it to Peugeot. This may or may not be utter rubbish, but it does point to the excitement around this shape at the time, especially when compared with the rather boxy saloon on which the Coupe was based.

The interior was a rather less impressive affair, with most parts lifted straight from the 406 saloon. But at least there was plenty of space in all four seats and a decent boot, which is more than can be said for many of its contemporary rivals.

Cornering was not the 406 Coupe's best asset. Though there was plenty of grip from the front-wheel drive chassis, the soft suspension lead to lazy handling, with pretty chronic body roll. I was taken around a track in one of these in 1997, and in fast corners that odd combination of high grip and high roll meant it really did feel like it might tip over, despite being fairly low to the ground and not particularly heavy, at 1450kg.

But, in a sense, it is these very 'shortcomings' in the car's dynamics that betray the essence of the 406 Coupe's character. This may have been around at the same time as the Fiat Coupe, Toyota Celica, Alfa GTV and Nissan 200SX, but it wasn't a rival to them. No, this was something quite different. The 406 Coupe was a soft, wallowy thing; A motor for wafting, not ragging.


The 24-valve V6 was particularly ideal for this, known for its smooth and consistent power delivery and a sensuous but subtle note. It was a tad thirsty (optimists struggle to put the figure as high as 30mpg), but in exchange for that you got 210bhp (194bhp December 1999) and a very respectable 209lb ft of gently-delivered torque. In manual guise, this meant 0-60mph in 7.5 comfortable seconds, and a rather impressive 149mph flat-out.

In truth, the example we've picked out for SOTW probably isn't the one to have. It's a manual, and though this may at first seem appropriate for a coupe, the 406 is really best seen as a luxury car and not a sports car. A smooth auto 'box seems a much more appropriate choice - but at least a manual makes the best of the available power, and the thirst won't be quite as poverty-inducing.

It's worth underlining that this price does represent the cusp of these cars' used values. A V6 SE for under a grand is a bit of a scrape, but just a few hundred quid more gets you into much broader territory, and a reasonable number of the 10,709 examples of the 406 Coupe originally sold in the UK are still around. But this particular example is not to be sniffed at; 100,000 miles isn't a great deal these days, and being in SE spec you get all the toys appropriate to a luxury coupe, including climate control, electric heated leather seats and a CD multichanger. Road tax is due this month, but the MOT is good for another 6 months.

Design has aged well
Design has aged well
We're not particularly worried about the scratch on the driver's door, but there is something a little suspicious in the advert's warning that the 'door locks need some attention'. The 'performance exhaust and filter' also seem rather unecessary for a car of this character. But we're being fussy. What we have here is a comfortable, quick and elegant coupe designed by 'them people what did Ferraris' - all for Shed money. Its hard not to see the appeal.

There's no proper description on the eBay auction page, but there is a fairly comprehensive data table listing the car's particulars. At the time of writing the auction price is beginning to creep awfully close to the £1000 'Buy it Now' price, and the auction ends shortly after midnight tonight.

If you haven't already, be sure to Join SOTW on Facebook for lots more Shed-tastic goodness.

Author
Discussion

taldo

Original Poster:

1,357 posts

220 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
ominous looking ebay ad that...

i do like 406 coupe's though, havent driven one but they're nice to look at and i belive came equipped with brembo brakes on certain models?

Edited by taldo on Friday 19th February 10:17

anonymous-user

80 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
Yeah they do have Brembos. At least on the V6.

McAndy

16,066 posts

203 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
Oh that's not fair! I've been considering/hankering after one of these for quite a while now...I love the lines, but reliability concerns have always prevented me from splashing the cash. Properly tempting sheddage chaps!

Woodstar

392 posts

200 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
I think one of these would make a great (and cheap!) daily driver.... scratchchin

patmahe

5,911 posts

230 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
Pretty much every time I go to buy a car one of these creeps in for consideration at some point. I have never taken the plunge yet but I think its inevitable that one day I will.

Papa Hotel

12,760 posts

208 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
I like it, a very handsome car indeed.

gifdy

2,078 posts

267 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
I loved my 406 coupe and would have another, especially at these prices. If you can stop yourself thinking about fuel economy the 3.0L SE is definitely the one to have. Perfect motorway cruiser. Don't agree with going with the auto though - I tried one while buying and hated it.

The only real problem I had in 4 years of ownership was the 'foil' on top of the gearstick peeling away and shredding my hand smile

soad

34,444 posts

202 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
Nice motor that, chap next door had one.

OnTheOverrun

3,965 posts

203 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
I had one about 10 years ago as a company car for a short while. Drove well, no sports car but brisk and refined. The interior however was very fragile and electrics suspect.

slipstream 1985

13,662 posts

205 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
i looked at a diesel one for my daily commuter, comfortable great looking and looks like it costs more than its worth. a great budget posers car

B19GRR

1,980 posts

282 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
Not sure if that's the 210bhp engine or not it's pretty near the change over date. Also if it needs a cam belt then that'll be £800 please - ouch which makes it fairly anti-shed all of a sudden! They also like to chew on coil packs which can be a pain to get to if they're on the rear bank. They are nice looking cars though but I agree the write up is spot on about the suspended-to-waft character of these cars wink

Cheers,
Rob

cdrx

599 posts

214 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
DR10 said:
Yeah they do have Brembos. At least on the V6.
Yup. The later V6's (99/2000 on) had Lucas brakes not Brembos, though.

mat13

1,977 posts

207 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
My coupe was my best car so far, paid 500 quid for it with a few problems and 72k on the clock, was very thirsty around town but surprisingly frugal on the motorway. It even did it's job to the end managing to drive away from quite a nasty spin off of the motorway.

bazking69

8,620 posts

216 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
Still a fine looking car even today. Good choice.

andrewrob

2,913 posts

216 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
B19GRR said:
Not sure if that's the 210bhp engine or not it's pretty near the change over date. Also if it needs a cam belt then that'll be £800 please - ouch which makes it fairly anti-shed all of a sudden! They also like to chew on coil packs which can be a pain to get to if they're on the rear bank. They are nice looking cars though but I agree the write up is spot on about the suspended-to-waft character of these cars wink

Cheers,
Rob
I have a V6 saloon and certainly wouldn't buy one again as its always had niggly problems.

Mine is the older 194bhp engine (car is a 2000 V plate) and funnily enough I've just had to replace the existing coil pack which has lasted only 18 months.
On my type of engine there is one single coil pack (on the front three cylinders) that feeds the back ones too so changing it takes less than 5 minutes and costs around £120, the newer engine has individual coils on each cylinder.

As for cam belt I paid £550 at a local independent with £200 of that being the belt and tensioners.
The clutch was a nasty one at £750.
Needless to say I will be glad to see the back of mine.

Just a quick note, from memory the 194bhp does 0-60 7.5 seconds whereas the 210bhp is 7.8 but slightly more economical.

I can easily get 34mpg on the motorway but drops to around 25 around town (which isn't too bad)

Feel free to ask any further questions

Chris71

21,549 posts

268 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
Woodstar said:
I think one of these would make a great (and cheap!) daily driver.... scratchchin
yes

Great SOTW I reckon.

leon9191

752 posts

219 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
That is the prettiest taxi I have ever seen!

I would still steer well clear though, I dont find them the least bit compelling. But I guess 210BHP is quite impresive.

Loose_Cannon

1,602 posts

279 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
patmahe said:
Pretty much every time I go to buy a car one of these creeps in for consideration at some point. I have never taken the plunge yet but I think its inevitable that one day I will.
Ditto, although avoid the diesel like the plague, like having a boat anchor slung out in front. Also the brakes were of the "0h st" variety which did nothing until panic set in and you stamped on them. The Pug dealer said were a "feature" of the range.....rolleyes Do they extend to the petrol versions too?

da_murphster

1,053 posts

273 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
Hmmm...looking for a comfy 'shed' to do a 60 mile (each way) commute 3 times a week.

Work will cover fuel.

Are these easy to work on for the home mechanic (never buying an Alfa again - nightmare!)

Are they generally unreliable?

Seats comfy? Quiet on the m'way?

V

16,104 posts

233 months

Friday 19th February 2010
quotequote all
Looks like a decent car for the money. I used to be quite a fan of these when they first came out.