Why dont we get Supercharged Diesel car engines?

Why dont we get Supercharged Diesel car engines?

Author
Discussion

vlc

Original Poster:

1,014 posts

246 months

Tuesday 20th April 2004
quotequote all
as we only hear about turbo-diesel powered cars, does that mean 'supercharged-diesel' cars aren't worth building, or possible?

an if so then why?
for you get them for petrol engines as with turbo's...

mad jock

1,272 posts

263 months

Tuesday 20th April 2004
quotequote all
I have seen supercharged marine deisels, and even better, supercharged two stroke deisels. We have them on some oil rigs for generators. V12's and their pistons are about 8 inches in diameter!
A very old supercharged two stroke deisel was the rather odd Commer TS3, which was the only true boxer engine I have ever come across, (3 cylinders, 6 pistons!)in that the pistons came together in a common cylinder, and was fitted in some trucks. The con rods were attached to a large rocker to another con rod, and then onto a common crank. Very odd set up, but very powerful.

GavinPearson

5,715 posts

252 months

Tuesday 20th April 2004
quotequote all
vlc said:
as we only hear about turbo-diesel powered cars, does that mean 'supercharged-diesel' cars aren't worth building, or possible?

an if so then why?
for you get them for petrol engines as with turbo's...


Turbochargers are powered by energy that would otherwise be wasted so they are providing power for free.

Given that diesels are there to save fuel it makes sense to not waste it by powering a supercharger and let the energy of exhaust gas go down the pipe without driving anything.

It is certainly a feasible project to build a supercharged diesel, response off the line would be stunning.

phil hill

433 posts

277 months

Tuesday 20th April 2004
quotequote all
Slightly off thread, and wayyyyyy too big for cars, but what about Napier's Deltic for a supercharged two stroke diesel ?? Three cranks, 18 cylinders, opposed pistons....... www.lexcie.zetnet.co.uk/delticengine.htm

Phil.

cptsideways

13,553 posts

253 months

Tuesday 20th April 2004
quotequote all
Mazda make one on the 626, it's not very fast though compared to a Tdi.

FourWheelDrift

88,572 posts

285 months

Tuesday 20th April 2004
quotequote all
You can also get supercharged two stroke diesels in WWII tanks, as seen on Salvage squad last night.

Pigeon

18,535 posts

247 months

Tuesday 20th April 2004
quotequote all
Bollocks, I missed that. I love supercharged two-stroke diesels. I have a long-term project to build one in V-twin format for a bike engine.

Two-stroke diesels need plenty of air for scavenging, so they have to be blown. And it has to be with a crank-driven supercharger; a turbo won't give you any scavenge air at start-up. You can have a turbo take over once it's got the revs up though. Indeed, you can extract more energy from the exhaust than is needed to drive the compressor, and add it to the power available from the crank - this is what the Napier Nomad aero diesel did.

BMGM3

10,480 posts

244 months

Tuesday 20th April 2004
quotequote all
Some trucks have superchargers.

mad jock

1,272 posts

263 months

Wednesday 21st April 2004
quotequote all
I have seen turbocharged two stroke diesel generators. At start up, a dog clutch engages the turbo off the end of the camshaft until the exhaust gases spin it up. Quite clever, really.

Pigeon

18,535 posts

247 months

Wednesday 21st April 2004
quotequote all
That's neat, that's neat, that's neat, that's neat, I really love that dog-clutch feat.

NDT

1,753 posts

264 months

Wednesday 21st April 2004
quotequote all
Pigeon said:
you can extract more energy from the exhaust than is needed to drive the compressor, and add it to the power available from the crank - this is what the Napier Nomad aero diesel did.


also known as turbocompounding - think the big two stroke train/ship diesels use this.

N

gnomesmith

2,458 posts

277 months

Wednesday 21st April 2004
quotequote all
mad jock said:
I have seen supercharged marine deisels, and even better, supercharged two stroke deisels. We have them on some oil rigs for generators. V12's and their pistons are about 8 inches in diameter!
A very old supercharged two stroke deisel was the rather odd Commer TS3, which was the only true boxer engine I have ever come across, (3 cylinders, 6 pistons!)in that the pistons came together in a common cylinder, and was fitted in some trucks. The con rods were attached to a large rocker to another con rod, and then onto a common crank. Very odd set up, but very powerful.


There should surely be a not between very and powerful in the last line. They were difficult to keep cool too. If you wish to read about one find a test of the Ecurie Eccosse transporter.

vlc

Original Poster:

1,014 posts

246 months

Monday 26th April 2004
quotequote all
Ok guys - so are we saying a supercharged diesel is better than a turbo-diesel if you had to race with either of them?

an why would some trucks have them instead of a TD.

an why dont bmw an Landrover use them in their premier 4WD cars, or dont they have any real performance advantage over a TD engine?

any body?????

gnomesmith

2,458 posts

277 months

Tuesday 27th April 2004
quotequote all
A turbo charger, more properly called a turbosupercharger is merely one of many types of supercharger. You need to be more specific if you require a definitive answer and you also need to think about drive systems, it all gets a bit complex (not comprix or centric they are yet more types of supercharger).

The real attraction of a turbo blown production engine is the lower cost of developing an instalation and the way the market is seduced by a swelling of power as the revs rise.

robbo1

842 posts

283 months

Tuesday 27th April 2004
quotequote all
gnomesmith said:
A turbo charger, more properly called a turbosupercharger is merely one of many types of supercharger.

I think vlc is making the distinction between exhaust-driven (turbo) and crank-driven (super).
Is it because diesels tend to produce their peak power at lower revs and therefore don't need the extra boost at low crank speeds? Only guessing...

Pigeon

18,535 posts

247 months

Tuesday 27th April 2004
quotequote all
It's cheapness. Turbochargers are cheaper than superchargers. Also, a lot of the difficulties associated with setting up a turbo on a petrol engine aren't there with a diesel.

simpo two

85,595 posts

266 months

Tuesday 27th April 2004
quotequote all
I think Jaguar are planning a supercharged diesel in their new sportscar, apparently a bit like the XK180 that never made it.

As I understand it a turbocharger is driven by exhaust gases, whilst a supercharger is driven mechanically from the crankshaft. That's why turbos only work above a certain rpm, whilst the effect of a supercharger is proportional from standstill.

They certainly worked on Bentleys and Spitfires

Pigeon

18,535 posts

247 months

Wednesday 28th April 2004
quotequote all
The one on a Spitfire was a centrifugal supercharger, though, not a positive displacement one, so like a turbo it only works at high revs (basically)... but you don't need bottom end grunt on an aero engine, so that's OK.

vlc

Original Poster:

1,014 posts

246 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
gnomesmith said:
comprix or centric they are yet more types of supercharger.

What ???????

what is he saying - i thought for years there were 2 forms of engine-asperation...turbo-charged or super-charged.

former is powered from exhaust gases / latter is powered direct by the engine.

so what these other types i never heard about....?

robbo1

842 posts

283 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
[anorak=on]
Depends on the shape of the rotor I think - some have vanes to force the fuel/air mixture through under pressure, Others have a screw arrangement. VW used a "G" shape (hence the Golf G40). Different types are commonly named after the manufacturer that developed them (e.g. Roots)
A Comprex is a "pressure wave" supercharger developed by Brown Boveri.
[anorak=off]