RE: Driven: Aston Martin V8 Vantage S

RE: Driven: Aston Martin V8 Vantage S

Friday 11th March 2011

2011 Aston Martin V8 Vantage S | PH Review

The best sports car money can buy? (Play nicely, forumites...)


Before you write the Vantage S off and accuse it of being yet another version of yet another similar-looking Aston Martin, just take a look at its credentials. Because this car - with its new seven-speed paddle shift gearbox, its 430bhp V8 engine and its candy-sweet (and rather deftly tweaked) rear-drive chassis - could actually be one of the very best sports cars money can buy right now. It's not as if the Vantage has been found wanting in the looks department since its inception in 2003, after all.

But that's the problem (or at least the perceived problem) with Aston Martin, right there, in a nutshell. Ever since it introduced the VH platform some eight years ago, the cars it has produced have all had a familiar kind of feel to them. And in the beginning that seemed really rather clever.

You could see the genes being gracefully handed down as each new VH model appeared - be that DB9, DBS and even the One-77, which took the idea, ran with it, and then turned it into some kind of cartoon. For a good while, though, the very familiarity of the brand felt slick, logical and considered. But then some time during the last couple of years the worm turned; overnight almost we began to get fed up of seeing the same car being reproduced, again and again, featuring a bit more power, a bit less style, singing the same old tune.

Is that fair? Almost certainly not, if only because it's what Porsche has been doing for over 40 years with the 911, making a tidy amount of money (in more recent years) as a result. And in the case of the Vantage S, it seems wholly inappropriate to make the 'done that, got the T-shirt' accusation when the car itself is so very good.

The key areas in which it has been improved are the steering, which has a quicker rack and feels sharper in every dimension; the suspension, which has been further tuned to improve the handling/body control without denting the ride; the gearchange, which has one more cog and is frankly in a different league for shift speed/quality compared with the six-speed; and the engine, which not only develops more power and torque (430bhp/361lbft) but makes a significantly more delicious noise in the process.

The net result is almost certainly Aston Martin's best car. On the road the Vantage S feels searingly rapid and rides/steers/handles/stops with breathtaking clarity. Yet it also has a grown up resolve to its overall personality that would make it very easy to live with everyday. If you drove this car in isolation, unaware of its immediate family history, you would be knocked sideways by how superb it is. That's the point, even if it's also Aston's dilemma.

Thus, if any car can be a bargain at £102,500, this is it - and the first person who points out that a Nissan GTR is faster but costs £32,000 less must now go and stand in the corner with their hands behind their backs for at least the next five minutes. Because they will have missed the intention of the Vantage S entirely.


Specification | Aston Martin V8 Vantage S

Top speed: 189mph
0-62mph: 4.5sec
Economy: 21.9mpg (combined)
CO2: 299g/km
Kerb weight: 1610kg
Engine: V8, 4735cc, petrol
Installation: Front, longitudinal, rear wheel-drive
Power: 430bhp/7300rpm
Torque: 361lb ft/5000rpm
Gearbox: seven-speed Sportshift II
Fuel tank: 80 litres
Boot: 300 litres
Wheels: 8.5jx 19in (front), 10.0jx19in (rear), alloy
Tyres: 245/40R19 (front), 285/35 R19 (rear)

Author
Discussion

LongLiveTazio

Original Poster:

2,714 posts

197 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
Want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want want

wackojacko

8,581 posts

190 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
Not liking that colour ......... Sounds like a cracking motor.

mk1fan

10,517 posts

225 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
Colour bad, car gooood.

Me wanty. Never had an issue with the similarities between the models, as said Porsche have been doing it for years.

vetteheadracer

8,271 posts

253 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
I like the colour, much better than the usual boring shades of grey Aston use.

Smike

23,223 posts

203 months

PhantomPH

4,043 posts

225 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
Is that a 'Driven' article that tells me absolutely NOTHING about what it's like to actually drive?

In a nutshell, 'leave Aston alone because this is nice'. Erm...some detail on the actual driving experience, please?

P~


Matt UK

17,696 posts

200 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
I normally prefer the coupe to the drop tops, but if I had the money I'd be mighty tempted...

treetops

1,177 posts

158 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
Hopefully they'll include AA membership...

dele

1,270 posts

194 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
Whats it like without a roof?

Any hint of being wobbly? Thats what always puts me off Convertibles

Zod

35,295 posts

258 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
treetops said:
Hopefully they'll include AA membership...
Why would they do that?

Zod

35,295 posts

258 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
dele said:
Whats it like without a roof?

Any hint of being wobbly? Thats what always puts me off Convertibles
The V8 Roadster is very stiff. No detectable wobble.

suffolk009

5,385 posts

165 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
But I still can't bring myself to want one. It's the marketing departments fault...

chazwozza

729 posts

186 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
Zod said:
treetops said:
Hopefully they'll include AA membership...
Why would they do that?
Sounds like an ill informed crack at saying astons are unreliable...which they aren't!

goron59

397 posts

171 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
It's all wrong!

It has 1 too many wheels, 6 too many pistons and no roundels or shark's teeth. And costs over 3 times as much.


TheArchitect

1,238 posts

179 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
So much WANT! I have personally preferred this over the db9 since it came out. and still to this day its a lovely car!

Neil1300R

5,487 posts

178 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
PhantomPH said:
. Erm...some detail on the actual driving experience, please?

P~
Its bloody brilliant. Slightly sharper steering / feel over a standard one, suspension setup better over rough British roads - but less roll in the corners. Sharper throttle response - manic when you select S mode and a utterly brilliant gearbox. Gorgeous sound especially the way it blips the throttle on the downshifts - don't think I would ever get tired of that one - come off a motorway in 7th stamp on the brakes and keep pulling the left handle paddle!
Only downside is all the side skirts / body addons which detract from the original pure shape.
Did I mention it bloody brilliant wink


sjmoore

1,893 posts

204 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
Part of the problem might be is that they have made loads of changes under the skin but it still looks the same so that people like myself, who tested the Vantage not that long after it was launched and were rather underwhelmed, don't really consider it as an alternative to Porsche, who update the mechanicals with each generation of the 911 but also update the looks enough to ensure that it can be treated as a new model.

mikey k

13,011 posts

216 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
dele said:
Whats it like without a roof?

Any hint of being wobbly? Thats what always puts me off Convertibles
I have a 4.7 sports pack one and came from an S2000 there is absolutely no scuttle shake! (and it has been reliable as hell wink for the doubters!)

Looking forward to the demo cars coming up in the winter so I can grab a bargain smile

Zod

35,295 posts

258 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
chazwozza said:
Zod said:
treetops said:
Hopefully they'll include AA membership...
Why would they do that?
Sounds like an ill informed crack at saying astons are unreliable...which they aren't!
Yes, I was just inviting him to be more explicit, but I doubt he will reappear in the thread.

scampbird

265 posts

282 months

Friday 11th March 2011
quotequote all
You know the GTR is a lot cheaper but also faster? You do know that, right?

Ok, I don't care either. The Aston looks gorgeous, will sound gorgeous and if I could justify a two seater I'd love one.