Holy smoke - Jag's 70s diesel flirtations

Jaguar and petrol go together like gin and tonic. Everyone knows that. Even when the firm eventually offered a diesel for the X-Type back in 2003, the timing lagged well behind rivals.

So we were surprised to hear from Jaguar's famous former test driver Norman Dewis that he'd spent a long time back in 1975 testing a diesel. Very surprised.

The engine was supplied by Italian marine specialist VM Motori, who was looking to get into cars. Dewis tells us the engine was tested in an old Mark X, but would have been fitted to the highly acclaimed XJ6 (pictured top). "I went to the Nardo test track in Italy, we ran that Mark X and did 100,000 miles," he says.

Dewis recounts his roasting from Lyons
Dewis recounts his roasting from Lyons
So why on earth was a company known for its hard-hitting six-cylinder petrol engines looking at diesels? "At the time, the Suez crisis was happening and they were on about rationing petrol," Dewis tells us. "We thought, bloody hell, we couldn't sell one car with the consumption we've got. So we investigated diesel."

He even got so far as to sign the engine off for production.

Of course it never made it into a Jaguar and Dewis has a great explanation as to why not. Jaguar founder William Lyons, obviously a bit more hands off at this point, comes up to Dewis one evening in the Browns Lane experimental shop and asks what he'd been up to. "I've been in Italy doing the diesel engine," he replies.

Then comes a legendary response from Lyons: "Diesel?! Diesel?! What are you talking about? We don't want a diesel engine in Jaguar cars. Dirty, smelly, noisy things - forget it!" As Dewis tells us, "All that work, blown away. He nearly sacked me for it."

Italian diesel found a home in this SD1
Italian diesel found a home in this SD1
That VM Motori diesel did find its way into British Leyland cars, first the Rover SD1 as the 2400SD Turbo and then the Range Rover. But not Jaguar.

Not that Dewis was really a fan, not back then. "Years ago diesel engines were crap - smelly, rattly, clonking," he says. "But now, now, I wouldn't go back to petrol." It helps he's got a new XF diesel of course, a fine car in both 2.2-litre and 3.0-litre guises.

It was under Ford stewardship that Jaguar got its first diesel, and Dewis is no fan of what happened then. "When Ford had Jaguar, it was diabolical - Ford should have never taken it on." Tried to make it too big, too fast, was his main criticism.

Now though, the man responsible for some of Jaguar's finest sports cars, including the D-Type and E-Type (of which more later) is happy with the current set-up under Indian owners Tata, especially with its hands-off approach to Jaguar's development. These days that means combining likes of the new (all-petrol) F-Type two-seater with the diesel saloons and estates preferred by the all-important business market.

As Dewis says, "I wonder what Lyons would say today?"

P.H. O'meter

Join the PH rating wars with your marks out of 10 for the article (Your ratings will be shown in your profile if you have one!)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Rate this article

Comments (90) Join the discussion on the forum

  • thejpster 18 Nov 2012

    beetroute said:
    Last of all, somebody suggested that a longer wheelbase might help reduce complaints about the lack of rear room in the car, so a 5" stretch behind the B pillar was engineered as an SVO project.

    Ah, the hilarious cost of not making a plan and then sticking to it .....
    Weren't those stretched 'Majestic' bodies built by CPP? I recall they carried a huge price premium over the SWB version. I know a chap who has several.

    My X330 was built in-house, which made it cheaper. Although of course that's nothing compared to what it actually cost me to buy one a year ago. Massively undervalued at the moment.

  • Max_Torque 18 Nov 2012

    robsa said:
    Ford Scorpio
    robsa said:
    Brilliant car
    Generally not two sets of words ever seen together in the same sentence before scratchchin

  • mat777 17 Nov 2012

    LewisR said:
    JREwing said:
    mat777 said:

    Until Jag can explain why their XF 2.2D manual is less economical than and makes more CO2 than an Audi A6 3.0 auto, then my family will unfortunately continue to buy German frown
    Is there a manual XF?
    Nope, there is no manual XF. I'd know if there were.
    Sorry, I was getting cars mixed up there. But my point still stands - 2.2 eco model costs more on emissions tax than a 3.0 sport Audi? Sort it out, Jag

  • robsa 17 Nov 2012

    I had a Ford Scorpio with a 2.5 TD VM engine in it. Brilliant car, let down only by the woefully unreliable engine.....

  • masermartin 17 Nov 2012

    I did love that series smile

View all comments in the forums Make a comment