Mercedes SLS AMG Electric Drive: Driven


I have driven a Tesla sports car two times - the first was educational and surprising, the second ended with a pair of black lines stretching 50 yards down a quiet country road. The initial acceleration was so intense that the tyres just couldn't cope.

But the limitations of the Tesla were the limitations of the car on which it was based, the Lotus Elise.

Different modes have a dramatic effect
Different modes have a dramatic effect
Post-Tesla the world went electric sports car mad. Audi gave us the E-Tron, Ferrari spoofed a 599 with a few Duracells under the cabin floor and pretty much everyone said they'd have an electric performance car on sale before long. But as things stand, only Mercedes AMG has managed to follow the rhetoric with some actions.

The SLS Electric Drive will go into production in May and the first customers will take delivery in July. The car has a claimed 740hp, 737lb ft of torque and a top speed limited to 155mph.

Same but (very) different
This is not an electric car like the others I've come across. The bodywork looks to be stock SLS but the carbon backbone chassis underneath houses twelve battery modules with 72 cells. And this is where we call need to start using a new vocabulary - that of the fast electric car. It has an energy content of 60 kilowatt hours and can withstand an electric load of 600 kilowatts. To my petrol-addled ears this description makes it sound like an especially potent pair of loudspeakers, but attention is regained once again by the claim of 0-62mph in 3.9 seconds.

There's a lot to take in and get your head around
There's a lot to take in and get your head around
The other dramatic spec-change over a standard SLS is the front suspension: the damper won't allow a front driveshaft so it's been completely redesigned as a push-rod system.

Mercedes claims the car will manage 175 miles on a full charge if driven carefully and that 125 miles could be expected if you use some more of that torque. Computer simulations show that the car would run two full laps of the Nordschleife flat-out, but not complete a third. The target lap time is under eight minutes - which is punchy give the car weighs 2,200kg. The batteries alone weigh 548kg.

Early adopters
This is of course a rolling showcase for future technologies as much as a sports car to stand comparison against fossil powered equivalents. It is the very cutting-edge of battery, motor and torque-vectoring technology and yet in terms of kerbweight, range and cost (nearly £400K) it remains uncompetitive with its immediate rivals in the sector.

They're looking at an eight-minute 'ring lap
They're looking at an eight-minute 'ring lap
All of that goes out the window the moment you pull back the familiar SLS gear lever into D and gingerly prod the accelerator. The car creeps the first few yards in its Comfort setting and swooshes forwards as you try and find a correlation between right foot movement and acceleration. The throttle pedal travel is long and the car is limited to just 590hp in this and Sport mode, and top speed is pegged at 125mph. There are two 'sound modes'. One provides a kind of new-age soundtrack through the 11 speakers and is part-Tron, part real-time representation of how the car is moving. It's very subtle and I barely noticed it, mostly because the car itself was busy blowing my mind. You can switch it off completely if you wish.

Comfort gives way to Sport mode, which gives a tighter chassis response through the torque vectoring system and sharper steering The headlines are all about the SLS's electric powertrain, but the chassis systems are just as impressive and certainly more pertinent to the way cars will be engineered in the near future.

No V8 but the numbers come up just as fast
No V8 but the numbers come up just as fast
Jekyll and Hyde
Because each wheel has its own motor and gearbox the car can accurately control individual wheel speed in any situation, and this means the chassis team can programme all manner of chassis behaviour, feel and character into the car. So whereas a conventional sports car chassis offers different levels of electronic intervention and perhaps damper stiffness, the SLS feels profoundly different in Comfort than it does in Sport Plus. The steering, power delivery and grip front-to-rear seem to belong to two completely different cars.

Sport Plus is the mode you really want. Full power, full torque, 155mph and slip angles: this car will paint black lines in the dry. It hides its mass very well because the centre of gravity is low and in the centre of the car. The standard SLS Michelins tend to let go at the front first, but the torque-vectoring gamely tries to keep everything neutral - the only problem being that your inputs to trim the car's line sometimes conflict with the computer's. But you quickly learn to adapt to what it wants and doesn't want. And then it dawns on you that you're driving an electric car very, very fast. The carbon ceramic discs that felt supreme in the 1,650kg standard car are at their absolute limit in this one.

No V8? No problem
Switch the traction control off and it's a monster. I mainly drove it in the wet and you could pull monstrous slides - a completely surreal experience with zero engine noise. Straightening the car back into line after the slide was challenging because the computer wants to get involved, but again you learn to adapt.

As for battery life - well, we hooned about using all the performance for an hour and consumed around 65 per cent of the charge. I didn't expect it to last that long. Based on that the 125-claimed range in normal driving seems perfectly achievable, driven slowly that rises to around 175 miles.

I still can't believe that Mercedes AMG has delivered on the promise with this car. It will go into production in May and will cost around £400K. That is crazy money for most of us, but it previews what will be possible very soon. It is the fastest electric car ever made and it happens to offer all the comfort, practicality and style of an SLS. It's unlike anything I've driven before and it left me grinning like a child. Electric cars shouldn't do that.


MERCEDES SLS AMG ELECTRIC DRIVE
Engine:
4x electric motors, 72-cell lithium-ion 60kwh battery
Transmission: One per axle
Power (hp): 740 (combined)
Torque (lb ft): 649 (combined)
0-62mph: 3.9sec
Top speed: 155mph (limited)
Weight: c. 2,200kg
Range: c. 155miles
CO2: 0g/km
Price: c. £400K

 

 

P.H. O'meter

Join the PH rating wars with your marks out of 10 for the article (Your ratings will be shown in your profile if you have one!)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Rate this article

Comments (62) Join the discussion on the forum

  • kambites 11 Mar 2013

    GTRStage1 said:
    If you can afford a £400k car...you can afford petrol.

    Great technical feat...but not sure who on earth would buy one?
    I would if I had that sort of money to throw around.

  • GTRStage1 11 Mar 2013

    If you can afford a £400k car...you can afford petrol.

    Great technical feat...but not sure who on earth would buy one?

  • ayseven 07 Mar 2013

    I see the car makers as follows:

    "We built an electric car like people wanted, but nobody bought it, so you can see it is not financially viable"

    "Now, run along now, boys, and go back to your petrol"

    As far as sound goes: did you see car makers putting Neighing and clop clop clop, into the sound of the auto mobeels they made in the early 1900's, so people would know what was coming? Of course not...

    The car makers are clearly behind the times, and are panicking, trying desperately to be part of the new world of expensive/relatively clean, energy.

    Edited by ayseven on Thursday 7th March 14:01

  • isee 07 Mar 2013

    405dogvan said:
    Surely the problem here is that it's a largely pointless exercise?

    We can no more generate power/dig-up enough rare materials for batteries than we can dig-up oil - electric cars are just moving pollution (which is OK because it makes it easier to control) and changing the supply-chain a bit - they're no more sustainable long-term and it's hard to see them ever replacing IC for enthusiast cars...

    Car manufacturers resisted electric power for a long time - I suspect their interest now is more in taking some subsidies and avoiding some taxes rather than actually finding a sustainable solution to their problems.

    Last year, for the first time in history, less fuel was used in the UK than in the year before. That is some progress of course - but it's nowhere near enough.

    Things like this are showcases - Tesla/Fisker is praying enough people feel guilty enough to buy their cars - everyone else is just praying no-one notices it's just a blind surely?
    I was right with you until that statement. If this SLS can leave black skidmarks for so long in the bone dry having 600kg more, imagine what it will do once batteries are light and rechargable within minutes?

    I always liked the idea of FOUR engines on each wheel, no gearbox, low centre of gravity whilst being lighter than IC engined car (not yet a reality i understand, but give it time) and fewer moving parts. Give it 10-20 years and IC engines will be what classics are now. Great nostalgia pieces that were great int heir day, but are hopelessely outclassed even by the modern budget euroboxes now.

    I don't expect the fuel savings will last long, once all the petrol stations close down and we all charge our cars at night, night tariff will carry a massive premium, but at least we won't have diesel particles in our lungs all the time, urban dwellers will be able to open their windows and breathe nice air and hear each other over the traffic noise on the street, while petrolheads will be doing sub 7 minute N-ring laps in utter silence in tehir BMW 3 series.

  • Mark Wibble 06 Mar 2013

    Batteries and/or fuel cells are the key to the viability of electric vehicles. For batteries, I think the days of Lithium are numbered, they're too susceptible to manufacturing defects and abuse whether inadvertent or not- with things as they are, a combination of cost and reliability means in practice there's a limited market. I believe research is going on in all sorts of areas to find cheaper and more sustainable battery tech but nothing new has been developed so far.

    Without making the basic costs (purchase & running) fundamentally affordable, people just won't be interested. Although obviously as oil-based fuels become more expensive, any kind of electric system becomes more affordable.

    So at this time where there is no viable successor to lithium, some kind of lease/swap system seems sensible. And that means you need to standardise basic battery characteristics ASAP before too many proprietary standards come into existence. Voltage range, dimensions and connectors for example- make them plug'n'play. So for now lithium-based batteries can be used, replaced by the next generation in the same packaging; that way you don't penalise everyone who bought into current battery technology, and people are more open to buying something along those lines now rather than waiting until everything's perfect.

    Fuel cells have the same fundamental benefits, with the up-side that you could probably achieve higher energy storage density with current technology, but the down-side that what-ever fuel they use would need a distribution infrastructure. So in a way they're more unlikely right now.

    And of course what-ever the "final" solution is, it will be expensive compared to what we have today- but given the number of recently closed shops on my local high-street, personally I don't think it's a bad thing if there's a regression, if you will, to relying on amenities as a result of fuel costs escalating to the point people prefer not to make short-distance trips by their own vehicle.

    Getting back on-topic, development of this SLS and the variety of recent performance hybrids are absolutely necessary to kick-start what will become the electric revolution- these are the first proper steps and it's good to see a positive article. I get tired of people saying how these cars are irrelevant and pointless- people like that just don't get the big picture.

View all comments in the forums Make a comment