PH2: BMW K1600 GT


There is a kind of industry standard in the motorcycle world that says an engine has to have one, two, three or four cylinders. There are a few exceptions, such as the flat-six Honda Gold Wing and...well, that's about it really. Excluding oddballs such as the Boss Hoss, which uses a V8 Chevrolet (V6 is the lady's option...), every other mass-produced bike has a maximum of four pots. Why is this when the car world is a veritable smorgasbord of configurations?


It all boils down to physics. Bikes lean, cars don't. Stick a wide engine on a bike and you start to encounter ground-clearance issues. In the 1970s monsters such as the Honda CBX1100 and Kawasaki Z1300 came with across-the-frame in-line six motors, but they died out in the 1980s when tyre companies discovered grip. Honda only gets away with it on the 'Wing by laying the engine flat, thus making it long rather than wide, with three cylinders per side. BMW changed all this last year by making the K1600, an in-line six that sits in the same direction as most four-pot sports bike motors and is only marginally wider. Which begs the question: why?

The joy of six
The K1600 GT is all about torque, thumping out a massive 112lb ft at 5,250rpm. But this only tells half the story. The peak is at this point, but the GT has more grunt than a 70s porn star and by 1,500rpm it is making around 80lb ft. When you ride a touring bike you want to be lazy, and with this much torque on offer you can be incredibly lazy on the GT - and that's all down to the in-line six motor.


There is virtually no need to change gear on the GT, the engine pulls from everywhere in the rev range and does so with a strong burst of acceleration. Adding a pillion into the equation doesn't seem to affect the motor and it keeps on churning out the torque and powering you on your way. But the biggest surprise is when you hit the top of the rev range.

The bike I rode had a set of aftermarket road legal Akrapovic cans fitted, something that enhanced the truly outstanding sound when the in-line six started to spin. At 6,500rpm the whole engine's note changes and it screams until it hits the 8,500rpm redline. It's bloody wonderful and totally unlike a touring bike. But it's not all plain sailing.


With fewer than 1,500 miles on the clock, the bike I rode was pretty fresh, but all the same the gearbox was fairly rough. The lever's action was clunky and stiff and, while I accept this may ease when the gearbox beds in, I wasn't that impressed. That said, the engine is so good you hardly ever need to shift anyway...

Touring ticked?
A touring bike has to be comfortable. Secondly, it has to have a decent tank range as there is no point in having a comfortable bike that needs filling up every few miles. Thirdly, it has to handle well and, finally, have a motor that doesn't require constant attention. I don't mean servicing attention, I mean needless gear changes every time you want to overtake a car or accelerate out of a restricted limit zone. With all that torque on offer, the BMW certainly ticks this box and the GT averaged 45mpg with a tank range of close to 230 miles, which is certainly acceptable.


On the comfort stakes the BMW's seat is sumptuous and superbly sculpted. The adjustable screen is nicely V-shaped, so that your get a clear view of the road through the bottom of the V while the rest of the screen deflects the wind/rain, and the stretch to the bars is relaxed. In fact I did several journeys of over 140 miles with no discomfort at all on the GT, so top marks there. And the handling is also extremely good.

Yes it's a big old bus, but the GT carries its 319kg extremely well and at low speed is remarkably balanced and easy to control. Through faster bends the weight pins the bike to the road and, for a full dress tourer the BMW is certainly sporty and lacking any of usual wobble of bigger bikes, thanks in part to the excellent electronically adjustable suspension. Push a few buttons and the ESA firms-up the ride, a few more buttons and it is back to soft and forgiving. Ah yes, electronics...


Digital distraction
We have a few moans about the K1600, most of which stem from the sheer number of gizmos on board. The bike we tested had cruise control, heated grips, radio (which can be heard at 80mph!), a heated seat, GPS, active suspension, fuel modes and about a million-and-one other techy bits, most of which are operated via the onboard computer system.

Despite being extremely well thought out and clear, it can be a constant distraction. Trying to turn up the temperature on the heated grips involves scrolling through three or four different screens and you have to wonder just how much of the info available is actually of any use. On a bike you want to know how much fuel you have left, how fast you're going, what gear you're in and that's about it. Annoyingly, the analogue speedo is a bit cluttered and most of the time it's easier to read your speed from the GPS display!


Further ergonomic moans relate to the imprecise indicator switch, which owners will probably adapt to, but the location of the horn is much more of a worry. Horns are quite useful and on the GT, I found the rotating controller for the onboard computer got in the way of getting to the horn button. The one time I needed to toot at a car I instead found myself changing the tune on my iPod (yep, that links in as well) and blasting Staying Alive at the offending car by way of a warning...

Verdict
For destroying the miles the GT is superb. It's extremely comfortable, rapid and can even corner with some degree of sporting ability. The electronics are annoying, but that's just the way things are going. If you want all the bells and whistles you need some way to control them and it's better through one screen than to have a million buttons like a packet of spilt M&Ms on the dash. At £15K without all the gizmos the GT ain't cheap, but it is also one hell of an impressive bike.

Engine: 1,649cc, six-cylinder
Power: 130hp at 7,800rpm
Torque: 113lb ft at 5,200 lb ft
Top Speed: 140mph (est)
Weight: 319kg (wet)
MPG: 45mpg (tested)
Price: £15,495


P.H. O'meter

Join the PH rating wars with your marks out of 10 for the article (Your ratings will be shown in your profile if you have one!)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Rate this article

Comments (36) Join the discussion on the forum

  • GreigR 26 Mar 2012

    winklaugh

  • UnluckyTimmeh 25 Mar 2012

    6fire said:
    I now own a Honda. I've had the following in recent years:-

    R1150R Rockster
    K1200R
    R1200GSA

    I've had final drive failures several times, electrical faults, brake system faults, clutch problems, suspension problems, throttle bodies that stuck wide open (on the 'K) several times, oil leaks, criminally poor finish, a starter motor that failed - the replacement ate the ring gear... And probably other stuff - I've tried to forget what an unpleasant experience it all was.

    All the time the bikes were under warranty, dealer serviced and everything got fixed, but not without a huge amount of hassle and inconvenience. In one 48 month period I averaged a warranty claim every 2 months...

    To be fair I also owned an older R1150GS which I maintained myself - the finish was rubbish, but the bike was at least faultlessly reliable.
    Jeez. You've had a fairly good innings. Sorry to hear that.

    I can't say I have much experience with them as I've only been with a dealer for a year and don't see many/any older models. But luckily we don't see many issues with the new models. smile

  • 6fire 25 Mar 2012

    UnluckyTimmeh said:
    Which BMW have you got? and what problems have you had?
    I now own a Honda. I've had the following in recent years:-

    R1150R Rockster
    K1200R
    R1200GSA

    I've had final drive failures several times, electrical faults, brake system faults, clutch problems, suspension problems, throttle bodies that stuck wide open (on the 'K) several times, oil leaks, criminally poor finish, a starter motor that failed - the replacement ate the ring gear... And probably other stuff - I've tried to forget what an unpleasant experience it all was.

    All the time the bikes were under warranty, dealer serviced and everything got fixed, but not without a huge amount of hassle and inconvenience. In one 48 month period I averaged a warranty claim every 2 months...

    To be fair I also owned an older R1150GS which I maintained myself - the finish was rubbish, but the bike was at least faultlessly reliable.

  • UnluckyTimmeh 25 Mar 2012

    6fire said:
    Reliability - if my recent experience of BMW motorbikes is anything to go by.

    Shame, they're lovely bikes ruined by woeful build quality and incompetent dealers. Only buy one if you like meeting recovery truck drivers...
    Which BMW have you got? and what problems have you had?

  • 6fire 25 Mar 2012

    off_again said:
    is there anything it doesnt have?

    hehe
    Reliability - if my recent experience of BMW motorbikes is anything to go by.

    Shame, they're lovely bikes ruined by woeful build quality and incompetent dealers. Only buy one if you like meeting recovery truck drivers...

View all comments in the forums Make a comment