PH2 Ridden: Triumph Daytona 675R



Adding Ohlins suspension and uprated brakes to an existing model has long been the quick-fix path to creating a premium variant in the motorcycle world. The European manufacturers have always been particularly good at this with Ducati and Aprilia leading the way with their 'R', 'SP' or 'Factory' versions. Early this year Triumph followed suit with the 675R - its first 'R' model.


For £9999 (that's £1500 more than the stock bike) the R gained Ohlins' NIX30 forks and TTX36 shock as well as an upgraded 18mm Brembo radial master cylinder with new Brembo monoblock calipers to match.

To add even more value, Triumph dipped into its official parts and accessories catalogue and added a quickshifter and some carbon bling, while the paint shop tarted up the bike's look with a unique paint scheme featuring a red sub-frame and a funky new 'Triumph' logo on the tank. And it worked; this year half of all Daytona 675 sales have been the R version, which is why for 2012 Triumph have created the Speed Triple R, essentially a Speed Triple with uprated suspension, wheels and brakes. So what's all the fuss about?


I rode the 675R at the Portimao Circuit in Portugal earlier this year when it was launched to the world's press and it really is a fabulous bike. Triumph's Daytona has been a thorn in the side of the Japanese 600s ever since it was first unveiled in 2006, thanks to not only its wonderful 675cc triple motor, but also its sublime chassis, something that is only improved with the addition of Ohlins suspension.

The level of feedback and assurance delivered by the Ohlins forks is very impressive with the front feeling incredibly planted, tracking over bumps and giving a feeling of total security. On a track like Portimao, which has some truly terrifying corners, front-end feel is essential and the 675 is right up there with the very best. The faster you ride, the better the feeling gets and even when you dive into a corner hard on the brakes the Pirelli seems glued to the track as the Ohlins forks glide over any undulations. And the feeling is the same from the shock.

With its lovely spread of torque, the 675 engine isn't the kind of engine that aggressively transfers its power to the rear, something that can upset a poor-quality shock, however that doesn't mean the effect of the TTX36 isn't noticeable. As with the forks, throughout the day the rear of the 675R felt incredibly responsive and delivered faultless damping, digging the rear tyre into the ground under acceleration and with a feeling of confidence that only encouraged me to push harder.


Overall it's pretty hard to fault the new 675R, the handling is superb and the new Brembo brakes offer strong initial bite without being overly ferocious. My only real criticism after a day on track is leveled at the gearbox. Changing gear under hard acceleration isn't a very pleasant experience and going from second to third with the throttle pinned results in a clunk from the gearbox and sometimes an even more disturbing shake of the bars as the bike protests at the abrupt input.

On track it wasn't too much of an issue, the shake never really threatens to go any further, however the gearbox only seems to respond well, and smoothly, to the quickshifter at very high rpm. To be fair to Triumph the bikes we rode on the launch were fairly new, so the gearboxes may need some bedding-in, but I have a feeling it's most likely down to a slightly clunky gearbox design. Another standard Triumph trait...

The stock Daytona 675 is an agile bike to ride on track or road and the R version retains all its sweet handling and glorious drive from the triple motor, but adds in a whole new dimension of sporting potential. To push the Ohlins suspension anywhere near its limits, you need to be a very handy national-level racer and for most riders it will instead offer an extremely responsive and accurate ride quality that can be fine-tuned to suit individual riding styles.


Looking at the list price of the suspension alone the R more than justifies its price tag and, when compared with the costs of some Japanese 600s, the triple starts to look very good value indeed.

The only thorn in the 675R's side in 2012 looks likely to come from Europe in the shape of the new MV Agusta F3, which ironically also possesses a 675cc triple motor and £9999 price tag. The F3 carries far more advanced electronics and the exclusivity associated with an Italian bike. But there is always a slight question mark hanging over MV when it comes to the distribution network and spares back-up. Personally I can't see this being an issue, though some potential buyers may be swayed to stick with a 'known quantity' such as Triumph.

I can't fault that logic, but I can't wait to see what the F3 rides like and if it really can provide some serious competition for the wonderful Daytona 675R.

 

Pics: Paul Barshon

P.H. O'meter

Join the PH rating wars with your marks out of 10 for the article (Your ratings will be shown in your profile if you have one!)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Rate this article

Comments (29) Join the discussion on the forum

  • Fleegle 08 Dec 2011

    Yazza54 said:
    My TT600 is mint mechanically..x reg. I've heard plenty of other TT and speed four owners saying the same. Looked at 675 that actually get used and they seem to fair well. So what are you basing this build issues notion on??


    I'm just speculating now, but it fks me off when people say things like this cos for example their mate told them or whatever who may not particularly look after the bike.

    ANY bike will look like st quickly if not looked after.

    I don't get people slating Triumph. I'm proud of them for doing so well and of course for being British. I find I don't have much to be proud of with this country anymore..

    Edited by Yazza54 on Wednesday 7th December 22:14
    +1

    Pisses me off that so many pounce on one of the few British successes. Most of it spouted by people who heard it from their billy big-bolx mate down the pub or cafe.

    I owned a TT600 from 2001 until 2 months ago. I ragged it. I dropped it. It had 20K+ miles on it, was unloved and unwashed.

    Not a furry fixing on it.



  • Yazza54 07 Dec 2011

    My TT600 is mint mechanically..x reg. I've heard plenty of other TT and speed four owners saying the same. Looked at 675 that actually get used and they seem to fair well. So what are you basing this build issues notion on??


    I'm just speculating now, but it fks me off when people say things like this cos for example their mate told them or whatever who may not particularly look after the bike.

    ANY bike will look like st quickly if not looked after.

    I don't get people slating Triumph. I'm proud of them for doing so well and of course for being British. I find I don't have much to be proud of with this country anymore..

    Edited by Yazza54 on Wednesday 7th December 22:14

  • _Neal_ 07 Dec 2011

    jamesghwilson said:
    I think it's a nice looking bike, but have Triumph overcome their build quality issues? Fastenings tarnishing/rusting...IMO it makes bikes look very old very fast.
    IIRC Triumph now use all stainless fastenings pretty much everywhere - my '08 Street Triple certainly does.

  • hostyle 05 Dec 2011

    jamesghwilson said:
    I think it's a nice looking bike, but have Triumph overcome their build quality issues? Fastenings tarnishing/rusting...IMO it makes bikes look very old very fast.
    I've got a 675 from 2007. There's no rust to be seen.

  • jamesghwilson 05 Dec 2011

    I think it's a nice looking bike, but have Triumph overcome their build quality issues? Fastenings tarnishing/rusting...IMO it makes bikes look very old very fast.

    Think I'd always favour a Yamaha R6 or a Honda CBR600R. However if I lusted after something exotic, perhaps a Ducati 749R...they cheap now (although I appreciate not to run).

View all comments in the forums Make a comment