Skoda Fabia vRS

Skoda Fabia vRS Why do manufacturers spend millions on motorsport, only to let their road going vehicles flood off the production line looking like the wheeled equivalent of Iain Duncan-Smith? Hyundai is one example, with its woeful Accent. It’s a similar story at Citroen, although at least they tried with the Xsara VTS.

You could include Skoda in that group. I mean, where’s the bewinged, tarmac-shredding, four-wheel-drive, turbocharged road car? Instead we’re handed a standard looking Fabia with five doors and a diesel engine! This is all very nice, but where’s the Garrett TR30R-fed 2-litre motor and active diff that the World Rally Car promises?

vRS

Truth be told, Skoda’s hot-hatch effort, the Fabia vRS offers far more fun than you’d expect. The 130bhp, 1.9 TDi might only power the Fabia to 60 in 9.6 seconds, but keep the tacho between 1500 and 2700rpm and you’ll be feeling the full force of its massive 310nm of torque (that's 228ft-lb in old money!).

The engine, which has been fitted to everything from the Golf to the A6, is - to be fair - a revelation. It’ll pull hard in any gear, and provided you’re in the power band, it’s more than capable of putting a smile on your face. Like most diesels, flooring it right round to the redline is pretty pointless as the power is all low down, so swapping cogs through VAG's proven six-speeder is a must.

Whilst its not usually too high on PHer’s list of priorities, the car is amazingly economical. Give it some beans and it’ll still cover over 40mpg, but on a motorway run, you’ll be looking at the right side of 60 to the gallon. That’s impressive whichever way you look at it.

£12K

Skoda Fabia vRS The trade-off is that in terms of refinement, it’s not up there with the likes of Mercedes or BMW – but this is a 12-grand car, not a £20,000 luxobarge. It’s pretty clattery on tick-over and if you, like me, leave your foot gently resting on the clutch pedal and your hand on the gearstick, you’ll be complaining of pins and needles before too long.

In terms of handling, it’s nowhere near the standard set by the small hot-hatch upstarts, the 106 and Saxo as there is too much wallow in the steering. That said, the steering offers adequate feedback – certainly more than the Polo, on which the Fabia is based.

It isn’t going to score many brownie points for looks, but we should be thankful that they’ve not made the vRS in the god-awful saloon or estate guise. Skoda’s chief designer, Thomas Ingenlath was responsible for the vRS’s design and, if you ask me, he's done a pretty good – if limited job of raising its design above the pit of mediocrity that afflicts its downmarket siblings.

Looks

Skoda Fabia vRS The front has been equipped with a pleasant front bumper, encasing the now-obligatory mesh vent between two fog lamps. Around the back, you’ll find a deeper bumper with a chromed tailpipe poking through off-centre, a boot spoiler and some discreet badging. And that’s about it. Which is all slightly odd considering the in-house design efforts of the World Rally Car, which is really rather handsome.

Still, all this adds up to looking like something ordinary to the casual observer that, if driven right, has the potential to leave Kev and his Fiesta choking on its diesel fumes.

The interior has the same feel as anything to come from the VAG stable. The switchgear has a quality feel and is well laid out, whilst the dials are clear and easy to read. The only indications of this model’s sporting credentials are a set of particularly supportive seats which move every which way, so finding the perfect seating position is a doddle, a bespoke gearknob and a couple of vRS logos on the dials complete the look.

Toys

Skoda Fabia vRS Skoda hasn’t been shy when it comes to specking the vRS. ABS, MSR and ASR all help to get that prodigious torque down onto the tarmac, whilst ESP can be added as a cost option. On the comfort and safety front, air-con, electric front windows, single-slot CD player, alarm, remote central locking and driver and passenger airbags all come as standard.

The Fabia vRS is in someways a Jack of all trades and master of none, but somehow it all gels together to become a quite appealing prospect. Pitch it against any number of rivals and you’ll find the spec levels higher and in many cases better performance. All indications are that residuals should be pretty good, reliability is likely to be top-notch, it sniffs at the diesel and you’ll even have the added benefit that it can still turn heads. No really!

Badger

Skoda Fabia vRS Unfortunately the main thing the Fabia has against it is the badge, which is a real shame because both the Fabia and Octavia vRS’s have a lot to offer the average petrolhead. Perhaps Skoda need to rebrand their marque and they certainly need to bin their ‘It’s a Skoda. Honest’ advertising campaign.

When it was launched a few months ago, there was no fanfare and it just slipped into the showrooms, largely unnoticed. But now people have started to take note. The Guild of Scottish Writers ranked it number 1 diesel car on the road and was a contender in CAR magazine’s Performance Car of the Year challenge.

Until my week living with the Fabia, I’d hardly noticed them on the roads, and lets be honest, they’re hardly the sexiest thing on four wheels. But in the days since, they seem to be everywhere. In fact, Which? have found the Fab to be the tenth most personally recommended car in the UK. Which is exactly what I’m doing to you. Try it – you’ll be surprised.

Links

Comments (177) Join the discussion on the forum

  • Chris_w666 20 Feb 2010

    pbirkett said:
    A.G. said:
    Not for one moment saying they are a rocket ship but I've an 03 Civic Type R in the garage as well and there certainly isn't 2 or 3 seconds difference. Skoda was no more than 2 car lengths behind by 60.
    To be fair I didn't say they were slow, indeed, they aren't. For a car with a power to weight ratio of under 100 bhp per tonne, they are a lot faster than they have any right to be.
    I actually regret not buying one, but at the time the ST170 had more going for it in terms of the drive than the VRS. The skoda felt much more exciting to belt through the gears though but the ST was IMO the quicker car. If I had driven the VRS in isolation I probably would have bought it and if there was a newer one produced at the same kind of price/performance ratio one would find its way here.

  • pbirkett 20 Feb 2010

    A.G. said:
    Not for one moment saying they are a rocket ship but I've an 03 Civic Type R in the garage as well and there certainly isn't 2 or 3 seconds difference. Skoda was no more than 2 car lengths behind by 60.
    To be fair I didn't say they were slow, indeed, they aren't. For a car with a power to weight ratio of under 100 bhp per tonne, they are a lot faster than they have any right to be.

  • cheadle hulme 20 Feb 2010

    2nd gear is the way to go for best traffic light grand prix.

    Get it rolling slowly so the other guy doesn't think you're going for it then boot it. 2000 - 4000 results in 60 showing pretty quickly.
    Mine is remapped to c170bhp and still on its original clutch and brakes at 55k.

  • Podie 20 Feb 2010

    The missus LE has just reached 60k and going strong.

    New OE brakes (discs and pads, all round) cost £130.

    Frugal daily motoring at it's best. smile

  • A.G. 19 Feb 2010

    pbirkett said:
    The shorter ratios were introduced in 2004 and shortened the 0-60 time from 9.6 to 9.4 secs.

    In reality they could all manage sub 9 secs stock.

    Autocars 7.2 sec run was only achieved once. Quite probably by starting in 2nd and being very abusive.

    Very much doubt it was mapped as 24 secs was par for the course 0-100. Given a 7.2 second 0-60, it then took a further 16.6 secs to reach 100, quite slow really. A remapped one could hit 100 in sub 20.

    Straight line drags weren't where they impressed though, it was the hooligan like midrange.

    They weren't really hot hatches in respect of they didn't have nimble handling or a revvy engine, and didn't really like being thrashed like a hot hatch - brake fade could be a problem even on the road and the puny smic struggled to cope with the heat standard let alone remapped.

    Decent quickish cars for medium to long length commutes with the occasional hoon.
    Not for one moment saying they are a rocket ship but I've an 03 Civic Type R in the garage as well and there certainly isn't 2 or 3 seconds difference. Skoda was no more than 2 car lengths behind by 60.

View all comments in the forums Make a comment