Speed Camera Misuse
The ABD's Hall of Shame


Home


Speed News

Speeding Survey

Camera Misuse

Govt Consultation

Geodesy Review

Valentine One

Links

Forum

 

The Association of British Drivers might be seen as an increasingly outspoken organisation as it champions the causes that downtrodden motorists have to deal with day in, day out. However as they point out with their latest comments on speed cameras, the need to speak out is greater than ever. The road safety issue is being hijacked for revenue earning purposes and its costing lives.

Misuse of speed cameras set to escalate

The new Government "Vehicle Crime" bill will allow a massive increase in the number of speed cameras and other speed enforcement activity by giving the police a direct financial incentive to entrap drivers without any safety justification.

New digital speed cameras, which former Met. Police Traffic Supremo and now RAC advisor Kevin Delaney has condemned as "revenue raisers", will make this possible.

When speed cameras were first introduced in 1991, the public was promised that they were to be used only in proven speed related accident blackspots, especially to protect pedestrians, and that sensible drivers had nothing to fear from them. The reality has been very different from the start.

Lowering driving standards

The ABD has chosen ten locations which show how most of these devices have been placed where they can have little positive impact on safety, and may even contribute to lower driving standards.

"The British public has been kept in the dark for years about the abuse of camera technology," says the ABD's Nigel Humphries. "Many of the locations are not justified in any way by safety. They are the product of over zealous officials who have been so blinded by emotive "Speed Kills" propaganda that they have forgotten what makes a safe driver - if they ever knew."

The ABD cites the following amongst the abuses perpetrated:

  • Cameras have been placed on new roads with no accident history
  • Statistics have been manipulated to make cameras look more effective than they are
  • Cameras have been used to enforce congestion reduction schemes that are nothing to do with safety
  • Even the civil servant who wrote the guidelines for camera deployment disagrees with how they are being used
  • Cameras have been used to reduce enjoyment and to intimidate drivers
  • Cameras have even been used in situations where they actually cause danger or in place of a much more effective safety solution - indirectly, they're killing people

Nigel Humphries continues: "Millions have been spent on cameras and camera enforcement which do so little to improve road safety, but much to make driving unpleasant. Instead, they should be helping drivers to drive safely - not slowly. The money spent on cameras could have made a real difference if it had been invested in training and education for drivers, cyclists and pedestrians."

The ABD's top ten camera abuses covers the whole country, with four locations around London, plus Oxfordshire, Avon, Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire, the Scottish Borders and Warwickshire all being singled out as providing prime illustrations of how both local authorities and the Highways Agency have ignored or distorted safety arguments in their use of cameras.

It's costing lives

ABD Chairman Brian Gregory concludes "It is tragic that 3,500 lives continue to be lost on the UK's roads every year, not because of speed but because of lack of training and education for road users. Now that the DETR is encouraging us all to "Think! Road Safety", is it too much to ask that a little more thought goes into how speed limits are set and where cameras are placed? The revenue raisers charter instigated by the Blair government means there is no chance of this happening."

The ABD is calling for an end to Britain's speed camera culture and a return to police enforcement properly targeted at dangerous behaviour. They also want to see all road users taking responsibility for themselves, improved driving standards through realistic training and education, and genuine road improvements to benefit all road users rather than to obstruct motorists.

The ABD's Hall of Shame

Avon - Batheaston Bypass


Derbyshire: A619 between M1 junction 30 and Chesterfield


Middlesex - A40, in particular the Master Brewer Junction


A1 Elkesley near Retford, Nottinghamshire


West London - M4 Bus Lane


M25 Variable Speed Limit - Surrey Section


All routes into London


A45 - Coventry - Birmingham


Oxfordshire/Gloucestershire - A40


Scottish Borders A68

 

If you want to add your voice to the campaign for common sense, join the ABD www.abd.org.uk

 

Back to Top