RE: Mercedes-Benz SL500: Review

RE: Mercedes-Benz SL500: Review

Author
Discussion

Oddball RS

1,757 posts

220 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
Any car that needs a cosmetic job so soon should pretty obviously not have been released looking like it did in the first place.

kambites

67,683 posts

223 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
Oddball RS said:
Any car that needs a cosmetic job so soon should pretty obviously not have been released looking like it did in the first place.
The R231 was released four years ago. That's about normal for a mid-life facelift isn't it?

Ed Straker

221 posts

145 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
I guess I would say this, but I prefer the pre-facelift (which I own)
And I prefer my 500 to the SL55 I had before that.
It's quite simply an epic bit of kit.

only1ian

690 posts

196 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
Hill Hunter said:
What SL driver weighs 75kg!
This one

powerstroke

10,283 posts

162 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
Will it fit a set of golf clubs and will the bridge club and rotarians like it ??? could be a winner !!!!

TOOMANYMS

44 posts

164 months

Tuesday 1st March 2016
quotequote all
Hill Hunter said:
What SL driver weighs 75kg!
Most women?

anonymous-user

56 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2016
quotequote all
Completely forgetting this model, it will be interesting to see what the next SL will look like. The ingredients are simple - a front engined, RWD, folding hard-top convertible with a big engine. It also has to 'fit' the bloodline. You wouldn't thought it was easy to muck that up, but as cars become more jammed-packed (even by M-B standards) full of electronics and devices, I can't help thinking the days of the Pagoda and R107 are over.

R230 was nice though.

///MR Rob

11 posts

228 months

Friday 17th May
quotequote all
Just bought a low mileage 2014 R231 SL500 in Hyacinth red with cream leather. Love the looks, love the way it drives. Love the quality, Love the awesome performance. And I appreciate that it's almost all aluminium. Not much dearer than an SLK of similar mileage & age. But a lot more car for the money. Would have cost around £40k more than the SLK55 new but all this for only around £3k more second hand. Though the SLK is excellent as a smaller roadster with a large engine. Horses for courses.

Edited by ///MR Rob on Friday 17th May 18:28