RE: Alfa Romeo SZ | Spotted

RE: Alfa Romeo SZ | Spotted

Author
Discussion

biggbn

23,714 posts

222 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
Aprilia99 said:
biggbn said:
ducnick said:
Whilst being a very interesting rare car (and one I’ve been very tempted to buy myself when they were £25k), the biggest problem with the SZ is that nowadays there are even rarer, more exotic, faster and more desirable Italian cars from a similar era for the same or less money. I would take a ghibli cup over an SZ every day of the week, let alone a shamal.
Alfa for me please, but I can see why you'd pick the maserati! Oh, go on then, I'll take one of each.
lucky to have both, 94 manual Ghibli and 91 SZ (SZ being restored and haven't driven it yet)...
I don't know you but I don't like you smile Incredible man, enjoy.

bloomen

6,970 posts

161 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
Had a couple of these when they were still relatively young.

Possibly the best handling car I ever drove. The lights and brakes were deadly. Not very fast at all.

Their values were flat for a very long time when other things were exploding. I'm not convinced they're suddenly in demand so wouldn't be putting money into one expecting it to increase.

And I remember late 80s flippers in the back of the Sunday Times asking 100 grand for these at launch. That must've hurt.



Maccmike8

1,047 posts

56 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
Fantastic.

ess

793 posts

180 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
Wonderful.
The 'bold' aesthetics always reminded me of the ECV from the same stable and similar era.

S


jimmytheone

1,396 posts

220 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
I love it, especially the front end, that row of lights and the dainty alfa badge - the back end, not so much laugh

75k feels a lot though, i wonder if i can pick one up on the cheap in 2 years when the market has crashed scratchchin

ducnick

1,811 posts

245 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
Aprilia99 said:
biggbn said:
ducnick said:
Whilst being a very interesting rare car (and one I’ve been very tempted to buy myself when they were £25k), the biggest problem with the SZ is that nowadays there are even rarer, more exotic, faster and more desirable Italian cars from a similar era for the same or less money. I would take a ghibli cup over an SZ every day of the week, let alone a shamal.
Alfa for me please, but I can see why you'd pick the maserati! Oh, go on then, I'll take one of each.
lucky to have both, 94 manual Ghibli and 91 SZ (SZ being restored and haven't driven it yet)...
Lucky guy with great taste in cars! Once your SZ is on the road you really must do a pistonheads back to back comparison and let us know your thoughts. I know many people deride the De Tomaso biturbo era Maseratis and they do have their faults, but the 90 degree v6 you have in the Ghibli really is a peach. The early carb ones on the twin choke Weber sound incredible, but the later injected ones are much easier on fuel and take a lot less tinkering to keep them running well. Got a real urge now to look for a good ghibli gt or an QP4 evo.

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,085 posts

100 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
Lotobear said:
I'll take a Montreal please and spend the saving on beer and hols.
Sadly, I suspect you'd end up spending the savings on the Montreal. Not the cheapest car to run...

sledge68

760 posts

199 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
how unreliable is the alfa, can you share some info?
Sandpit Steve said:
Alternatively, take a Ferrari 348 for the same money. https://www.pistonheads.com/buy/listing/13775064

Just as unreliable and expensive to maintain, but at least it turns heads for the right reasons.

cidered77

1,632 posts

199 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
Absolutely love these - such a bold design (and ugly, but also not ugly - somehow), so different to everything else out there, interests me soo much more than whatever generation of even more capable Cayman you could get for similar money.

Was half interested in getting one a while back, but it was the driving side that turned me off - beyond a decent exhaust note, don't think they're especially interesting to drive. More something to just stare at, be stared at.

75k is a decent whack up from the prices a couple of years back, but guess the mileage is low. Didnt realise they only made 1k tho - that is properly scarce, so can reasonably assume this is a safe place to put money - the internet (was there even internet back then?) reaction when these came out was near universal "WFT if that, its horrible", but now with age and more and more boring options available new i can see the appeal rising.... and there cant be many left of that original 1k surely.

k20ris

256 posts

151 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
Adam911T said:
Is it me, or are these images compressed or re-sized to make the car look even worse than it usually does?!

Nope, just checked some other pics on t’internet and the car in the article definitely looks artificially tall, narrow and, er, stubby!



When you’re trying to sell an ugly car, I’m not sure making it look even uglier is a great sales tactic?
The car in the advert definitely has a much higher ride height as well, unsure if OEM or not, the arch gap is seemingly huge!

jamies30

5,911 posts

231 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
k20ris said:
The car in the advert definitely has a much higher ride height as well, unsure if OEM or not, the arch gap is seemingly huge!
Haven’t looked in detail, but at a glance it just looks like suspension is in the raised position.

Lotobear

6,509 posts

130 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
BigChiefmuffinAgain said:
Lotobear said:
I'll take a Montreal please and spend the saving on beer and hols.
Sadly, I suspect you'd end up spending the savings on the Montreal. Not the cheapest car to run...
Perhaps but I'll quickly forgive that when I look at it and listen to the sweet little V8

Peppka

110 posts

192 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
Jamie Porter, Alfa Workshop had an SZ in once fitted with a Rotrex supercharger, centrifugal air compression working through high speed traction drive, BHP 300+, that really was a monster, wheelspin in third!

Plasticedd

45 posts

120 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
Speedgirl said:
I really enjoyed Harry’s video, made me see the car in a different light. Some fascinating engineering, inboard brakes, adjustable ride height plus lots of things that mean it’s so not a daily drive. That and the odd looks reminds me of the 4C, amazing but far from perfect, one for the Alfistas I think.
Alfasuds had inboard brakes so that was a well trodden route by the time the SZ came out, they were a swine to access on the Sud so probably even harder to access on the SZ.

DeltaEvo2

870 posts

194 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
Monstrously beautiful!

Every day a journey

1,660 posts

40 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
Always loved these…,

Can’t fit in them.

Goddam.

dinkel

27,000 posts

260 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
biggbn said:
Absolutely wonderful, I'd love one, yet I'd always know deep down an Alfa 75 3.0 V6 does the same job for a fractuon of the price!
No.

Not in the looks category.
And for performance: it's SWB so you'd struggle to keep up.

This or a 964? No hard choice.

Wadeski

8,173 posts

215 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
Arent there zero body panels, and, importantly, zero headlights available for these?

Wadeski

8,173 posts

215 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
Arent there zero body panels, and, importantly, zero headlights available for these?

nismo48

3,832 posts

209 months

Wednesday 24th August 2022
quotequote all
DeltaEvo2 said:
Monstrously beautiful!
thumbup I'll 2nd that smile