Burglary at remote Peak District farm, murder arrest

Burglary at remote Peak District farm, murder arrest

Author
Discussion

skwdenyer

16,627 posts

241 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Drumroll said:
Well when you come into the real world, you will realise virtually nobody can hold a 9mm legally at home in this country now and that is a good job.
The country isn’t safer since handguns were banned. Gun crime is much higher, and handguns seemingly just as easy (if not easier) to obtain by criminals, than back then. Incidences of gun crime are still very very low compared to many other countries - but they were before the ban, too.

I’m not saying I think everyone should have a pistol for self defence. But I am saying it is easy to ignore the actual statistics.

If we continue down the road of minimal, ineffective policing, there will eventually be a tipping point where reasonable people demand arms.

Just look at how under-served England & Wales are:



When you couple that with increasing inequality and so on, there’s no surprise crime is a problem.

The crime rates in England & Wales are far higher than in Scotland and Northern Ireland, yet the latter have far more police officers. It could be a coincidence, of course…

And what about violent crimes?



It is almost as if something happened after 2010 resulting in a four-fold rise in violent crime…

Pit Pony

8,732 posts

122 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
mac96 said:
boyse7en said:
fttm said:
Hopefully the home owner isn't charged . I'm with the majority of decent people on this one , feral low life scum break into your property then their rights are left at the door , no ifs no buts .
I hope the circumstances are thoroughly investigated and that the home owner is or isn't charged depending on what evidence is discovered. While I agree to some extent with your viewpoint, as someone who might inadvertently wander into private land during hikes or trail runs, I'd hate to think i could be shot without repercussions for a simple map reading error.
There is a bit of a difference between walking across a field and breaking into a farm building with 3 other blokes having driven up to it in a stolen car. Noone is suggesting lethal force for walkers?

Of course the difficulty is the grey areas in between and I think once this over, justice will probably be served.


I'm sure some farmers would vote for a change in the law. So that anyone on their land (mistakenly or otherwise) could be fed to the pigs

A few years ago, I was out (with my future wife) walking on a legitimate footpath, fog came down, and we ended up off the path using my compass alone. As Iwe got onto lower ground, the fog had lifted. And we could see a farm house in the distance, but not a clue on my OS map where I was.

As we headed across an empty field towards said farm, completely lost, an angry woman came storming out, with shot gun, pointing it directly at us.

I'm not sure that whatever previous encounters with the world she might have had, justified putting the sts up us.
We were accused of bringing death and abortion into her farm from.the big city.
Had we got to the front door and knocked in it, would she have blasted our heads off, I wonder. My wife still freaks out if we do not appear to be on a marked path.

What if it had been a winter walk and it had gone dark, and I had my two ugly looking male friends with me.

But I have gone off track. If people are genuinely in danger, then using force should be acceptable.

Zetec-S

5,938 posts

94 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
skwdenyer said:
The country isn’t safer since handguns were banned. Gun crime is much higher, and handguns seemingly just as easy (if not easier) to obtain by criminals, than back then. Incidences of gun crime are still very very low compared to many other countries - but they were before the ban, too.

I’m not saying I think everyone should have a pistol for self defence. But I am saying it is easy to ignore the actual statistics.
I'd be interested to know what statistics show that gun crime is higher now than when they were banned?

Appreciate this data only covers 2003-19 but it shows a clear decline over that period.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunit...

I agree with your other points regarding police/crime in general.

skwdenyer

16,627 posts

241 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Zetec-S said:
I'd be interested to know what statistics show that gun crime is higher now than when they were banned?

Appreciate this data only covers 2003-19 but it shows a clear decline over that period.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunit...

I agree with your other points regarding police/crime in general.
Homicides by firearm:



Clearly the handgun ban had no effect - all those handguns removed from circulation, yet numbers went up enormously before coming back down to basically the same level as pre-ban. (And yes I know this isn’t population weighted).

Since then there’s been a fall-off:



My point was that the ban didn’t obviously have any effect. Handgun crime is almost entirely (and was pre-ban) committed with illegally-held weapons, whilst theft of legally-held pistols was a tiny part of the supply equation.

As for wider gun crime, the stats get a little messy. But broadly the trends have followed those above, and tend to be correlated with other things.

At the same time, as we know, knife crime has increased dramatically. Society has got a lot more violent; the constrained supply of guns just means knives are used instead. But if you’re going to defend your rural farm against knife-wielding attackers, you’re going to demand a gun, not hand-to-hand combat training…

gotoPzero

17,322 posts

190 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Caddyshack said:
In actual fact, you can reasonably simply own a legal 9mm semi auto in England, you have to be a member of a target shooting club and the 9mm must have a dummy silencer plus a weight bar from the grip base, it then falls under rifle laws and can be used and held legally.

Farmers, and it was a farmer in the OP, can also legally own a large bore pistol, often revolvers in 357 magnum locked to 2 rounds capacity for animal despatch.
You describe a long barrel pistol. You can not have this in 9mm. It must be in .22 Rim Fire. I have a Walther PPQ exactly as you describe, but its in .22RF not 9mm. You CAN have a revolver in 9mm but the OAL must be 24" or greater.

The only place in E/W/S/NI a civilian can own a 9mm semi auto without having to jump through a lot of hoops is Northern Ireland. There you just need to be a member of a club, like the old days.

The law starts to get murky when you get into section 7, so we will ignore that as lets be honest out of the hundreds of thousands of FAC holders only a hand full are section 7.

As for section 5, yep some people do get authority under section 5. But again its a tiny, tiny number of people. Film and TV, maybe 10 guys in the UK with authority for sec 5. There will be a handful of people who get authority from the Home Office, the kind of people who dont exist... and beyond that you are down to stalkers and vets and they are going to be restricted to a couple of rounds and I believe semi auto is currently off the table for new applications. Farmers are never given section 5 authority for pistols, not that I know of. Maybe if they are a stalker, but then the use is going to be for HD only.

Beyond that the only way you can realistically shoot "pistols" legally in England is to get a muzzle loading revolver like a Westlake in .357. Thats about as close as you can get if you are not interested in cap and ball revolvers.

It would just be easier to become a Registered Firearms Dealer tbh.

smile

Zetec-S

5,938 posts

94 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
skwdenyer said:
Clearly the handgun ban had no effect - all those handguns removed from circulation, yet numbers went up enormously before coming back down to basically the same level as pre-ban. (And yes I know this isn’t population weighted).
Fair enough, homicides might not have changed significantly. But overall firearm offences have significantly reduced, so the statistics would suggest that the ban has actually had a very big effect, surely?


popeyewhite

20,030 posts

121 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Pit Pony said:
I'm not sure that whatever previous encounters with the world she might have had, justified putting the sts up us.
We were accused of bringing death and abortion into her farm from.the big city.
Farmers are extremely fearful of foot and mouth. When the consequences of an infection might be your livelihood ruined, you take an interest in idiot walkers that get themselves lost on your land. Same happened to me, and I got two barrels up my nose and told to quickly leave the property. biggrin


Edited by popeyewhite on Friday 3rd May 18:31

GliderRider

2,131 posts

82 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
skwdenyer said:
Zetec-S said:
I'd be interested to know what statistics show that gun crime is higher now than when they were banned?

Appreciate this data only covers 2003-19 but it shows a clear decline over that period.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunit...

I agree with your other points regarding police/crime in general.
Homicides by firearm:



Clearly the handgun ban had no effect - all those handguns removed from circulation, yet numbers went up enormously before coming back down to basically the same level as pre-ban. (And yes I know this isn’t population weighted).

Since then there’s been a fall-off:



My point was that the ban didn’t obviously have any effect. Handgun crime is almost entirely (and was pre-ban) committed with illegally-held weapons, whilst theft of legally-held pistols was a tiny part of the supply equation.

As for wider gun crime, the stats get a little messy. But broadly the trends have followed those above, and tend to be correlated with other things.

At the same time, as we know, knife crime has increased dramatically. Society has got a lot more violent; the constrained supply of guns just means knives are used instead. But if you’re going to defend your rural farm against knife-wielding attackers, you’re going to demand a gun, not hand-to-hand combat training…
What those graphs don't show is who the victims are. It is highly likely that gun crime has moved towards drug-related intergang feuds with illegally held weapons and away from the general public being attacked with legal weapons.

hairykrishna

13,185 posts

204 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Fermit said:
A friend of my fathers is (now a retired) Policeman. He once gave me some advice, to state, if you'd harmed/killed an intruder. 'Officer, he was coming right at me'. They don't like burglars any more than we do.
One of my friends was mugged and defended himself fairly robustly. One of the coppers arresting him said something along the lines of "I expect you thought your life was in danger". A not so subtle hint as to what to say in interview.

Randy Winkman

16,277 posts

190 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
TheJimi said:
Drumroll said:
TheJimi said:
Where does he say anything to the contrary?
I’d take a 9mm every time in a house.

The whole post came across as a bit "walty" to me.


Edited by Drumroll on Friday 3rd May 10:46
So he's said nothing that warranted your response.

Saying he'd prefer a 9mm over a shotgun in a house isn't walty, imo - he's just stating a preference given a hypothetical scenario and backs up his preference with the reasoning behind it.
Either way, I'm glad I live in the London suburbs where I no more feel the need for a gun than I do a hovercraft.

Electro1980

8,354 posts

140 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Pit Pony said:
As we headed across an empty field towards said farm, completely lost, an angry woman came storming out, with shot gun, pointing it directly at us.
That would be an utterly stupid thing for someone to do now, in the days of mobile phones.

However, far to many farmers are completely ignorant on trespassing, and do go shouting and threatening people who are lost and wander of a path, a civil matter, yet think criminal blocking of rights of way is all fine and dandy because it suits them. Many farmers are fine (I have several friends who are farmers), but some are utter tts, just like the rest of life, but most of the tts in life don’t have shotguns and vast tracts of land.

Drumroll

3,779 posts

121 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
I do find it interesting how this debate is going. We have several on here saying about being able to have guns to defend ourselves and we have other threads (any one of the USA mass shooting threads) that basically goes on about how bad Americans gun control is and how nobody really needs that many guns etc.

As for the assertion gun control hasn't worked, we really can't answer that one. Just because people are still being killed by guns, does not mean a failure of the legislation.

You could argue that you would expect to see an increase in gun (or any crime) just purely based on the increase in population.

hidetheelephants

24,685 posts

194 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
The main problem with UK gun legislation is that it punished law abiding owners by taking away their guns rather than address the problem at hand, which was and still is enforcement and administration of FAC conditions. Hamilton should not have had an FAC, nor should Byrd or Davison, yet the incompetent and inconsistent administration and enforcement goes on.

TheJimi

25,039 posts

244 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
UK Knife laws are much the same.

Penalises otherwise law abiding citizens, and doesn't make a blind bit of difference to the nutters who carry knives as weapons and are happy to use them as such.

Somewhatfoolish

4,403 posts

187 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
gotoPzero said:
Caddyshack said:
In actual fact, you can reasonably simply own a legal 9mm semi auto in England, you have to be a member of a target shooting club and the 9mm must have a dummy silencer plus a weight bar from the grip base, it then falls under rifle laws and can be used and held legally.

Farmers, and it was a farmer in the OP, can also legally own a large bore pistol, often revolvers in 357 magnum locked to 2 rounds capacity for animal despatch.
You describe a long barrel pistol. You can not have this in 9mm. It must be in .22 Rim Fire. I have a Walther PPQ exactly as you describe, but its in .22RF not 9mm. You CAN have a revolver in 9mm but the OAL must be 24" or greater.

The only place in E/W/S/NI a civilian can own a 9mm semi auto without having to jump through a lot of hoops is Northern Ireland. There you just need to be a member of a club, like the old days.

The law starts to get murky when you get into section 7, so we will ignore that as lets be honest out of the hundreds of thousands of FAC holders only a hand full are section 7.

As for section 5, yep some people do get authority under section 5. But again its a tiny, tiny number of people. Film and TV, maybe 10 guys in the UK with authority for sec 5. There will be a handful of people who get authority from the Home Office, the kind of people who dont exist... and beyond that you are down to stalkers and vets and they are going to be restricted to a couple of rounds and I believe semi auto is currently off the table for new applications. Farmers are never given section 5 authority for pistols, not that I know of. Maybe if they are a stalker, but then the use is going to be for HD only.

Beyond that the only way you can realistically shoot "pistols" legally in England is to get a muzzle loading revolver like a Westlake in .357. Thats about as close as you can get if you are not interested in cap and ball revolvers.

It would just be easier to become a Registered Firearms Dealer tbh.

smile
Don't forget black powder pistols. The perfect solution for self defence against hordes of zimmer frame supported zombies

dudleybloke

19,900 posts

187 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Somewhatfoolish said:
Don't forget black powder pistols. The perfect solution for self defence against hordes of zimmer frame supported zombies
You only need one shot.
Drop the first one that comes in then hide in the smokescreen.

Somewhatfoolish

4,403 posts

187 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
The main problem with UK gun legislation is that it punished law abiding owners by taking away their guns rather than address the problem at hand, which was and still is enforcement and administration of FAC conditions. Hamilton should not have had an FAC, nor should Byrd or Davison, yet the incompetent and inconsistent administration and enforcement goes on.
Indeed. UK gun legislation is undoubtedly (to my mind) too tight (although in some ways it is actually laxer than US gun control e.g. magazine size for smaller calibres in that there isn't any) but if the alternative is US style rambo retards then maybe it's price we have to pay.

For actual self defence I'd probably be looking more at letting women carry around pepper spray and stuff like that.

Pit Pony

8,732 posts

122 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
Pit Pony said:
I'm not sure that whatever previous encounters with the world she might have had, justified putting the sts up us.
We were accused of bringing death and abortion into her farm from.the big city.
Farmers are extremely fearful of foot and mouth. When the consequences of an infection might be your livelihood ruined, you take an interest in idiot walkers that get themselves lost on your land. Same happened to me, and I got two barrels up my nose and told to quickly leave the property. biggrin


Edited by popeyewhite on Friday 3rd May 18:31
I understand the concept, but if I'm bringing anythung from.the big city, its chewing gum and vomit.

Southerner

1,431 posts

53 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
Somewhatfoolish said:
For actual self defence I'd probably be looking more at letting women carry around pepper spray and stuff like that.
In this day and age of increasing hysteria, allowing large swathes of the population to discharge noxious substances at will because they decided they felt threatened would be an absolute zoo. Arguably less so than if they all had handguns, admittedly!

Edited by Southerner on Saturday 11th May 06:19

Chrisgr31

13,500 posts

256 months

Saturday 4th May
quotequote all
There appears to be a Gofund me campaign for the resident. That suggests that the had been a break on the day before as well.