RE: MG 6 | Shed of the Week

RE: MG 6 | Shed of the Week

Author
Discussion

ConnectionError

1,809 posts

70 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
"Credit card payments are not accepted on this car"


I wonder why, do they know something that they are not saying and worried about Section 75?

Jordie Barretts sock

4,400 posts

20 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
ConnectionError said:
"Credit card payments are not accepted on this car"


I wonder why, do they know something that they are not saying and worried about Section 75?
I don't think they can legally say that any more can they?

donkmeister

8,259 posts

101 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
ConnectionError said:
"Credit card payments are not accepted on this car"


I wonder why, do they know something that they are not saying and worried about Section 75?
Or appealing to a particular demographic for whom cash is king and with a lot of time on their hands to complain about stuff biggrin

tim jb

191 posts

4 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Bit of a gopper

MrBrown1980

31 posts

105 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Can’t argue with the value for money if you need some transport. Does nothing else for me though.

GeniusOfLove

1,440 posts

13 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Jordie Barretts sock said:
ConnectionError said:
"Credit card payments are not accepted on this car"


I wonder why, do they know something that they are not saying and worried about Section 75?
I don't think they can legally say that any more can they?
They can't charge extra for cards but they can chose to refuse it as a form of payment.

It'll be partly due to the higher fees and partly due to section 75. Same reason holding deposits might be accepted on card but will be £99 so they're under the section 75 limit.

Honestly though if you're going to be a melt about problems with your £2k car and expect to go all "sale of goods act" then you haven't got the chops to be buying £2k cars. Crybabies expecting a brand new car for a grand are part of the reason really cheap cars have vanished.

valiant

10,343 posts

161 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Has Chevrolet Cruze vibes about it.


That is not a good thing.

Evercross

6,053 posts

65 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
YellowCar said:
jfdi said:
is that the high tide line round the edge of the boot carpet?
Good spot, looks as though it's served time as a garden pond before reaching shed status.

Presumably been stood for a while with a major leak, could have 'interesting' electrics if there are any major electrical connectors behind the boot trim.
Boot carpet watermark and the driver's window left slightly open - definitely suss. Willing to bet the interior of the glass would be dripping in condensation if left closed!

dan_m2k

4 posts

102 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Okay so these are a Rover 75 in a different dress? And they couldn’t call it a Rover as Ford or TATA bought the Rover brand out of administration?

This looks like a lot of car for the money. And even a quick google says that the motoring press hated it because it was ‘a Chinese rover’ but it drove really well.

I think She’d might have nailed it as a bit of motoring history wrapped up around company failure, resurgence and now moving in to desirability.

Also loved the earlier comment that the new Chinese owners fixed the maligned K-Series’ HGF issue in short order when Brummie’s finest didn’t, couldn’t or wouldn’t.


stavers

262 posts

147 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Wren-went said:
As an ex Rover employee up until.05 when the st hit the fan no way would I go anywhere.near this .

This was assembled in Longbridge from the kit parts sent from China..
I worked at Longbdrige for SAIC for 3 years and I wouldn't go near one to be a reliable run around either really. The petrol ones are renowned for killing synchros and the diesel ones have simple parts that if they fail will basically scrap the car (MAF sensor and clutch being the two big ones from the top of my head). The drivers seat was also way too high for my liking and if you had one with a rear windsreen wiper then above a certain speed it would flip up and stand upright!

Shame as the chassis was excellent and they handled well. Plus the diesel was very economical and not too slow.

theicemario

652 posts

76 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Quite like the look of these

Certainly more interesting than the gopping SUV we get now instead



vomit

A500leroy

5,154 posts

119 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
stavers said:
Wren-went said:
As an ex Rover employee up until.05 when the st hit the fan no way would I go anywhere.near this .

This was assembled in Longbridge from the kit parts sent from China..
I worked at Longbdrige for SAIC for 3 years and I wouldn't go near one to be a reliable run around either really. The petrol ones are renowned for killing synchros and the diesel ones have simple parts that if they fail will basically scrap the car (MAF sensor and clutch being the two big ones from the top of my head). The drivers seat was also way too high for my liking and if you had one with a rear windsreen wiper then above a certain speed it would flip up and stand upright!

Shame as the chassis was excellent and they handled well. Plus the diesel was very economical and not too slow.
So it was a proper Rover then.

kambites

67,643 posts

222 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
theicemario said:
Quite like the look of these

Certainly more interesting than the hopping SUV we get now instead
Sadly you could say this about the focus of just about every mainstream car manufacturer these days. frown

Rumblestripe

2,982 posts

163 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
I can think of a lot worse ways of spending £2k on a motor vee-hickle! As with any "shed" there is a risk that it will die in a cloud of steam, oil and cursing after 5 miles (or it may run and run). It looks smart enough, at a glance most won't know what it is (or care) the interior looks good considering it has topped 100k and the wheels look very good (if I compare them to my Mini wheels that have done 35k less they are miraculously good)

The fragilities mentioned are likely behind it.

If you can abandon your badge snobbery, why not?

AC43

11,508 posts

209 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Until this morning I was blissfully unaware of this car and will spend the long weekend actively trying to forget it.

Om

1,809 posts

79 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
mooseracer said:
I think they did the same with the 6 - here is Autocar's mini-review in 2011:

"Better still is the MG 6’s chassis, which is quiet and supple, yet still controls body movements tightly. It’s clear that a great of MG Motor UK Ltd’s effort has gone into creating a convincing compromise between composure and sporting feel here, and it hasn’t wasted that effort. Hydraulic steering assistance allows for plenty of steering feel too."

Previously, in their drive of a pre-production model, they'd gone so far as to say it was a better chassis than the Focus of the time.
What do they know though? It was put together in Birmingham from some bits that came from China. It doesn't even have a German badge!

Some blokes on the internet who didn't know it existed before this morning will be along to put Autocar right soon.

Firebobby

551 posts

40 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
Top shedding! You could smoke this for 12 months and still get your money back. Fantasticbiggrin

Risonax

277 posts

17 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
stavers said:
Wren-went said:
As an ex Rover employee up until.05 when the st hit the fan no way would I go anywhere.near this .

This was assembled in Longbridge from the kit parts sent from China..
I worked at Longbdrige for SAIC for 3 years and I wouldn't go near one to be a reliable run around either really. The petrol ones are renowned for killing synchros and the diesel ones have simple parts that if they fail will basically scrap the car (MAF sensor and clutch being the two big ones from the top of my head). The drivers seat was also way too high for my liking and if you had one with a rear windsreen wiper then above a certain speed it would flip up and stand upright!

Shame as the chassis was excellent and they handled well. Plus the diesel was very economical and not too slow.
And yet, this 13 year old example has outlasted some Fords, Vauxhalls, Nissans, Citroens, VWs etc, and has 100k inder its belt, with some fairly routine repairs needed, and no extended time off the road waiting for a new gearbox. Which gearbox was it?

nismo48

3,778 posts

208 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
tim jb said:
Bit of a gopper
Yep, still worth a punt wink

Watcher of the skies

534 posts

38 months

Friday 3rd May
quotequote all
A500leroy said:
stavers said:
Wren-went said:
As an ex Rover employee up until.05 when the st hit the fan no way would I go anywhere.near this .

This was assembled in Longbridge from the kit parts sent from China..
I worked at Longbdrige for SAIC for 3 years and I wouldn't go near one to be a reliable run around either really. The petrol ones are renowned for killing synchros and the diesel ones have simple parts that if they fail will basically scrap the car (MAF sensor and clutch being the two big ones from the top of my head). The drivers seat was also way too high for my liking and if you had one with a rear windsreen wiper then above a certain speed it would flip up and stand upright!

Shame as the chassis was excellent and they handled well. Plus the diesel was very economical and not too slow.
So it was a proper Rover then.
No. This is a proper Rover