RE: Ariel Atom 160 | PH Auction Block

RE: Ariel Atom 160 | PH Auction Block

Friday 17th May

Ariel Atom 160 | PH Auction Block

Entry-level cars are generally to be avoided - but not when it comes to the Ariel Atom...


No other nation is as obsessed with weight saving as we Brits are. Lotus coined the ‘simplify, then add lightness’ mantra and has used it to great effect both on and off the racetrack, while Caterham has managed to keep the Seven formula going for over half a century and shows no signs of stopping. Sure, you’ll never find them with sonorous engines and most will shake your fillings out, but there aren’t many cars that’ll get you from point A to B faster - and with a bigger bug-blasted grin on your face - than a lightweight British sports car.

And they don’t come more exhilarating than the Ariel Atom. Hard to believe it’s been around for as long as it has because the Atom looks just as extreme and otherworldly as it did when the covers came off the prototype nearly 30 years ago. It’s said the Atom was conceived as a modern-day take on the Seven, with the concept of weight saving being taken to the absolute extreme with an exposed tubular chassis with some suspension components bolted to it, a pair of seats, some wheels and an engine at the back. So effective is the Atom recipe that Ariel has not dramatically altered it for the best part of three decades. 

When the production car arrived in 1999 it was powered by a Rover K-Series engine with 190hp, which was in charge of pushing along somewhere in the region of 550kg. From then on the Atom range has been powered by a series of Honda engines, aside from the utterly loony 500 that received a bespoke V8. The first Honda-powered car arrived in 2003, with the Atom 2 featuring the K20A engine from the EP3 Honda Civic Type R, while a bonkers supercharged version arrived shortly after with 300hp. If that all sounded a bit much, Ariel offered a slightly less intimidating model called the 160 - much like the one you see here

In place of the standard Atom 2’s Type R engine, the entry-level car received the 160hp 2.0-litre engine from the Civic Type S and five manual speeds to play with instead of the usual six. It’s still a K20A engine, mind, and needs to be revved right up to 6,800rpm to get everything the motor’s got to give. Interestingly, peak torque of 132lb ft is only 6lb ft shy of the Type R engine and is available much lower down the rev range at 4,000rpm. Despite the drop in power, the 160 was capable of hitting 62mph from rest in under five seconds which, with the absence of a windscreen, should still mess your face up Clarkson-style.

Meanwhile, the chassis hardware remained top drawer, only with some components scaled back to match the lower power output. The Alcon brakes dropped from four to two-piston callipers, while the inboard Bilstein dampers were non-adjustable (more on that in a bit) and set up for a more road-focused ride. What resulted was an Atom that, according to those who drove it, felt just as thrilling as the full-fat version, only with some of the base car’s more brutal characteristics dialled back a bit.

However, this particularly 160 has some very tasty mods plucked from Ariel’s parts bin, including the bell cranks and adjustable Bilstein suspension from the Atom 3, all of which were fitted by the sports car maker itself. The car also comes with new Alcon brakes up front and a ‘competition’ setup at the rear, so it’s primed and ready for the summer months ahead. It's a wonderful looking thing too, and all the more tempting with a guide price of £19,000 - £20,000. Where it’ll end up when the auction closes next Friday is anyone’s guess, but better get yourself registered to bid so you’re in with a shot of coming out on top. It is track day season, after all…


See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

86wasagoodyear

Original Poster:

427 posts

98 months

Friday 17th May
quotequote all
It can't be 25 years since these first went on the roads.. ...can it ??
This one looks great - maybe the best Atom of all for fun on the roads precisely because it's the "slowest".

ChrisCh86

868 posts

46 months

Friday 17th May
quotequote all
One headlight - does that cover the legal requirements off then?

This will be a mega car to drive. I'd love to have one in my fleet - but you'd need quite the selection of other cars in order to be able to justify this given that's its raining most of the year wink

RustyMX5

7,277 posts

219 months

Friday 17th May
quotequote all
ChrisCh86 said:
One headlight - does that cover the legal requirements off then?

This will be a mega car to drive. I'd love to have one in my fleet - but you'd need quite the selection of other cars in order to be able to justify this given that's its raining most of the year wink
Look again..... Two headlights wink

kambites

67,683 posts

223 months

Friday 17th May
quotequote all
86wasagoodyear said:
This one looks great - maybe the best Atom of all for fun on the roads precisely because it's the "slowest".
yes Same power as my Elise, which feels about right for the road, but with usefully less weight.

MDifficult

2,085 posts

187 months

Friday 17th May
quotequote all
86wasagoodyear said:
Maybe the best Atom of all for fun on the roads precisely because it's the "slowest".
I can answer that for you... Nope!

Don't get me wrong, any Atom is an otherworldly experience and this one will make someone very, very happy but IMHO when it comes to these, more is definitely more.

Om

1,818 posts

80 months

Friday 17th May
quotequote all
Nice. Surely that guide price is way too low? Even in 'base' spec that seems ridiculously cheap.

Edited to add: Wow - apparently not - https://www.pistonheads.com/buy/listing/16217762

Damn...

Edited by Om on Friday 17th May 15:06

GreatScott2016

1,242 posts

90 months

Friday 17th May
quotequote all
MDifficult said:
86wasagoodyear said:
Maybe the best Atom of all for fun on the roads precisely because it's the "slowest".
I can answer that for you... Nope!

Don't get me wrong, any Atom is an otherworldly experience and this one will make someone very, very happy but IMHO when it comes to these, more is definitely more.
I was thinking the very same, something like this must be the full fat version although fun with a capital F is still to be had with so called lessor models.

CG2020UK

1,611 posts

42 months

Friday 17th May
quotequote all
Boys and their toys driving

bobj42

30 posts

13 months

Friday 17th May
quotequote all
Enough power for the road, but other than driving to a (local) track day, I wouldn't drive one on the road, and I suspect most other people wouldn't solely drive them on the road.
Which means you want one with enough power to scare-yourself-silly on track, hence lack of demand for the lower powered versions.
The other thing about a low powered Atom is that everyone would be expecting you to be faster.
If I wanted one to use on the road, the Mugen version would be my choice just for the noise.


Edited by bobj42 on Friday 17th May 17:29

Fastlane

1,186 posts

219 months

Friday 17th May
quotequote all
That very car was bought from the factory last year. It has been for sale for a few months, at well above what he paid for it.

The guide price is about right...

nismo48

3,832 posts

209 months

Friday 17th May
quotequote all
I bet that's great fun even with 'only 160bhp'

MDifficult

2,085 posts

187 months

Friday 17th May
quotequote all
bobj42 said:
Enough power for the road, but other than driving to a (local) track day, I wouldn't drive one on the road, and I suspect most other people wouldn't solely drive them on the road.
Honestly, you’d be amazed. They’re wonderful road cars and you can cover a lot of miles very easily. Yes, they can get a bit cold and wet (but still warmer and dryer than a motorbike, and the right gear solves all) but they’re also wonderfully entertaining even at low speeds and everywhere you go, people are delighted to see you. You can wear a helmet, or ballistic goggles, or sunglasses, depending on your personal preference, and in the summer shorts and T-shirt does the job. I love how easy they are to potter around in but then, the road frees up and… whoosh!





Corkys

257 posts

203 months

Friday 17th May
quotequote all
bobj42 said:
Enough power for the road, but other than driving to a (local) track day, I wouldn't drive one on the road, and I suspect most other people wouldn't solely drive them on the road.
Which means you want one with enough power to scare-yourself-silly on track, hence lack of demand for the lower powered versions.
The other thing about a low powered Atom is that everyone would be expecting you to be faster.
If I wanted one to use on the road, the Mugen version would be my choice just for the noise.
Why wouldn’t you drive them in the road? They are insanely fun. I mostly only wear glasses to protect my eyes unless you are on the motorway. Never had an issue feeling vulnerable.
Love my Atom 4.
Edited by bobj42 on Friday 17th May 17:29

jasonrobertson86

647 posts

6 months

Friday 17th May
quotequote all
Best one is the 4 by a mile. avoid.

Fastlane

1,186 posts

219 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
jasonrobertson86 said:
Best one is the 4 by a mile. avoid.
Really, avoid? All Atoms are great cars and for a relatively affordable £20k the new owner will have just as much fun driving this Atom 2 it as someone with a 4, but for at least £35k less.

jasonrobertson86

647 posts

6 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
Fastlane said:
Really, avoid? All Atoms are great cars and for a relatively affordable £20k the new owner will have just as much fun driving this Atom 2 it as someone with a 4, but for at least £35k less.
The earlier ones are much harder to drive / control. Evidenced by the amount smashed on trackdays (ive seen a lot)

Bonefish Blues

27,140 posts

225 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
nismo48 said:
I bet that's great fun even with 'only 160bhp'
It is. I was all set to buy one, had agreed the (low, very fair) price... before I listened to Mrs BF. Much regret at my lack of male appendages on that occasion frown

Fastlane

1,186 posts

219 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
jasonrobertson86 said:
The earlier ones are much harder to drive / control. Evidenced by the amount smashed on trackdays (ive seen a lot)
Of course the 4 is easier to drive fast, but that doesn't mean people should avoid all Atoms except for a 4!

All Atoms are great fun to drive. Running out of talent on a trackday is nothing to do with the car...

jasonrobertson86

647 posts

6 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
Fastlane said:
Of course the 4 is easier to drive fast, but that doesn't mean people should avoid all Atoms except for a 4!

All Atoms are great fun to drive. Running out of talent on a trackday is nothing to do with the car...
Ok ok we get it, you love your atom, great. Disagree 'run out of talent', they are very tricky on the limit in my opinion. If you are a talented driving god, this doesn't apply to you.

Glosphil

4,390 posts

236 months

Saturday 18th May
quotequote all
I owned a 2005 Civic Type-S (obviously with the same engine) from 2006 to 2013. Absolutely reliable. Liked the car/engine except for 4th & 5th gear being far too low. Otherwise a great family car. Total cost of repairs in the 7 years was just over £300.

Performance was fine for a family car of its size & weight, 0-60 was 8.3s, but poor mpg at 33 over ownership (claimed was 37).