Russia Invades Ukraine. Volume 4

Russia Invades Ukraine. Volume 4

Author
Discussion

Talksteer

4,911 posts

234 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
IanH755 said:
The concern is that this will be over (one way or another) BEFORE Russia hits this mythical "number of deaths" which will suddenly, almost magically, change everything about how Russia has been fighting for the past 100+ years.

There is no magic number, there is no mythical "Oh but as soon as St Petersburg?Moscow starts seeing death they'll stop" - Russia is doing what Russia always does and wanting to pretend that there is some line in the sand on casualty numbers just doesn't recognise the reality of the situation, and to be blunt comes across in the same vein as "once they get Javlin/NLAW - once they get HIMARS - once they get StormShadow - Once they get Challenger 2/Abrams - once they get ATACMS - once they get F-16's" etc etc as being wishful hoping for a single thing that will suddenly win the war, rather than something based on reality where this will only be won/lost based on Putin and what he wants, absolutely nothing else will change that.
The Ukrainians are fighting for their country's survival, the Russians are fighting for Putin's vanity. There are lot's of ways for this to end that don't involve Putin's free will.

1: The west is slow and uncoordinated but they have orders of magnitude more industrial capacity than Russia. Factories are being built to manufacture shells, drones, anti aircraft missiles. By 2025 it is likely that Ukraine may have an equipment advantage and start grinding Russia out of their country. Putin's will has very little to do with this.
2: The fears of escalation have turned out to be illusory, if Russia could be doing more it probably would and they have much more to fear from escalation given that they are 100% committed already and NATO has basically sent some hand me downs. If NATO air forces started shooting down their missiles in Ukraine they aren't going to start attacking NATO countries or firing their missiles.
3: People will endure a lot in a war of necessity, this isn't one if Russia stops the cost is basically zero, they won't be invaded. When Wagner did their road trip nobody tried to stop them. This suggests that popular or elite moves against Putin would have a good chance of being supported by the other faction of society.

robinessex

11,077 posts

182 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
It's about time the West took their fingers out of their bums and started to get serious with this. Lots of the weaponry already supplied was almost past its shelf life, so it might as well be lobbed in the direction of Russia. If North Korea wants to get involved, then a few 'secret' missions to scupper the supply ships to Russia, and some sabotage on railway supply trains would wake them up.

964Cup

1,448 posts

238 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
robinessex said:
It's about time the West took their fingers out of their bums and started to get serious with this. Lots of the weaponry already supplied was almost past its shelf life, so it might as well be lobbed in the direction of Russia. If North Korea wants to get involved, then a few 'secret' missions to scupper the supply ships to Russia, and some sabotage on railway supply trains would wake them up.
I suspect the last thing we need is to be discovered taking direct action against a nuclear-armed non-combatant state led by someone with even worse impulse control than Putin.

Gecko1978

9,770 posts

158 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
964Cup said:
robinessex said:
It's about time the West took their fingers out of their bums and started to get serious with this. Lots of the weaponry already supplied was almost past its shelf life, so it might as well be lobbed in the direction of Russia. If North Korea wants to get involved, then a few 'secret' missions to scupper the supply ships to Russia, and some sabotage on railway supply trains would wake them up.
I suspect the last thing we need is to be discovered taking direct action against a nuclear-armed non-combatant state led by someone with even worse impulse control than Putin.
Wtf is he actually going to do. I doubt his army could leave the country

robinessex

11,077 posts

182 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
964Cup said:
robinessex said:
It's about time the West took their fingers out of their bums and started to get serious with this. Lots of the weaponry already supplied was almost past its shelf life, so it might as well be lobbed in the direction of Russia. If North Korea wants to get involved, then a few 'secret' missions to scupper the supply ships to Russia, and some sabotage on railway supply trains would wake them up.
I suspect the last thing we need is to be discovered taking direct action against a nuclear-armed non-combatant state led by someone with even worse impulse control than Putin.
Done '" under the counter", he'll never know who was responsible. I'm sure the Ukrainians would love to have a secret invisible "behind enemy lines" force. I think the sheer shock that chubby boy in N. Korea would get would make even him think again. Anyway, he'd have to consult the 100,000 over 80 senior military personnel (with the chest full of medals) he loves showing whenever he can.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=4k...



catso

14,795 posts

268 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
Gecko1978 said:
964Cup said:
robinessex said:
It's about time the West took their fingers out of their bums and started to get serious with this. Lots of the weaponry already supplied was almost past its shelf life, so it might as well be lobbed in the direction of Russia. If North Korea wants to get involved, then a few 'secret' missions to scupper the supply ships to Russia, and some sabotage on railway supply trains would wake them up.
I suspect the last thing we need is to be discovered taking direct action against a nuclear-armed non-combatant state led by someone with even worse impulse control than Putin.
Wtf is he actually going to do. I doubt his army could leave the country
And, maybe a good proportion of them that did leave might decide not to go back...

jshell

11,061 posts

206 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
What I don't understand is if the US was promising the Ukranians that they'd support them in a war against Putin as far back as 2016, why did it take so long?



hidetheelephants

24,702 posts

194 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
'I would like you to do us a favor' is the reason, TFG is transactional in all things.

Digga

40,398 posts

284 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
catso said:
And, maybe a good proportion of them that did leave might decide not to go back...
This, completely. The only game NK have is siege maintenance.

BikeBikeBIke

8,217 posts

116 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
Digga said:
catso said:
And, maybe a good proportion of them that did leave might decide not to go back...
This, completely. The only game NK have is siege maintenance.
Yeah, never really thought about it before but the last think the NK leadership want is for several hundred thousand people to see how good life is outside NK.

magpie215

4,420 posts

190 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
Russia waving the Nuclear stick.....again

MightyBadger

2,163 posts

51 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
magpie215 said:
Russia waving the Nuclear stick.....again
Can't really blame them after Cameron said it was ok for Ukraine to use the bombs and missiles we send them to conduct strikes inside of Russian territory.

CharlesdeGaulle

26,419 posts

181 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
MightyBadger said:
Can't really blame them after Cameron said it was ok for Ukraine to use the bombs and missiles we send them to conduct strikes inside of Russian territory.
Yeah, that's very proportionate!

Cheib

23,307 posts

176 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
Gecko1978 said:
964Cup said:
robinessex said:
It's about time the West took their fingers out of their bums and started to get serious with this. Lots of the weaponry already supplied was almost past its shelf life, so it might as well be lobbed in the direction of Russia. If North Korea wants to get involved, then a few 'secret' missions to scupper the supply ships to Russia, and some sabotage on railway supply trains would wake them up.
I suspect the last thing we need is to be discovered taking direct action against a nuclear-armed non-combatant state led by someone with even worse impulse control than Putin.
Wtf is he actually going to do. I doubt his army could leave the country
I doubt he’d even get to press the button

BikeBikeBIke

8,217 posts

116 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
MightyBadger said:
magpie215 said:
Russia waving the Nuclear stick.....again
Can't really blame them after Cameron said it was ok for Ukraine to use the bombs and missiles we send them to conduct strikes inside of Russian territory.
Eh? Why shouldn't Ukraine conduct strikes inside Russian territory?

TheJimi

25,040 posts

244 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
MightyBadger said:
magpie215 said:
Russia waving the Nuclear stick.....again
Can't really blame them after Cameron said it was ok for Ukraine to use the bombs and missiles we send them to conduct strikes inside of Russian territory.
That's some multi-level mental gymnastics.

Let's see. You launch a full-scale invasion on a sovereign country, flattening entire towns and cities, displacing millions and killing & maiming thousands.

Yet, when the opponent retaliates on your land, it's somehow both a surprise and frowned upon and your proportionate response is to wave your nuclear stick?

Yep, sounds about right. Can't blame them.


MightyBadger

2,163 posts

51 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
CharlesdeGaulle said:
Yeah, that's very proportionate!
Do you think Cameron was right to say that? Do you agree with it? Originally we were just helping them to defend Ukraine.

king arthur

6,596 posts

262 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
MightyBadger said:
Do you think Cameron was right to say that? Do you agree with it? Originally we were just helping them to defend Ukraine.
We still are.

MightyBadger

2,163 posts

51 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
BikeBikeBIke said:
Eh? Why shouldn't Ukraine conduct strikes inside Russian territory?
You could see how Putin might feel (waving the sabre) as we are making a lot of those strikes possible for Ukraine with stuff we send them.

Just feels like when Cameron says things like we creep just that little bit closer to WW3.

Oh well.



ecsrobin

17,189 posts

166 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
MightyBadger said:
Do you think Cameron was right to say that? Do you agree with it? Originally we were just helping them to defend Ukraine.
Yes
Yes
Striking facilities that are supporting the war effort inside Russia seems a sensible way to defend your country.