mk1 TT V6 or Scirocco R as 'cheap' family Sports car

mk1 TT V6 or Scirocco R as 'cheap' family Sports car

Author
Discussion

mk1fan

Original Poster:

10,664 posts

233 months

Friday 12th July
quotequote all
First world problem.

I would like to get a four seat sports car so our young kids (3 & 6) can be as terrified as my wife.

Ideally I would like a Cerbera but I would prefer not to spend that much.

Any [reasonable] arguments to pick a mk1 TT V6 over a Scirocco R or vice versa?

Legacywr

12,830 posts

196 months

Friday 12th July
quotequote all
You won’t get kids in the back of a TT…

rottenegg

827 posts

71 months

Friday 12th July
quotequote all
Likewise the Scirocco if they are chunky and tall kids.

They may be 'cheap' to buy but neither is cheap to run! You won't get much over 25mpg from either of them as a long term average.

I would swerve the MK1 V6 anyway and push the budget to a MK2 V6 as it's a much better car dynamically.

cerb4.5lee

33,798 posts

188 months

Friday 12th July
quotequote all
Find the money for the Cerbera! biggrin


HiAsAKite

2,418 posts

255 months

Friday 12th July
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
Find the money for the Cerbera! biggrin
This.

Or a 996?

E63eeeeee...

4,612 posts

57 months

Saturday 13th July
quotequote all
Legacywr said:
You won’t get kids in the back of a TT…
This. Only one of your options is actually a genuine four seater. I couldn't get my grandson's car seat in the back of the TT partly because of the space but also the seatbelt layout. Audi says a max height for rear seat passenger of 4'11" iirc, presumably including booster seat, but it's really tight in there.

E63eeeeee...

4,612 posts

57 months

Saturday 13th July
quotequote all
Also a Mk2 TTS is probably the more natural competition for the Scirocco R including on price. As mentioned the Mk2 is a sportier drive and the V6 isn't that great other than the noise, a Stage 1 Mk1 225 will be faster and the TTS is another level.

markiii

3,868 posts

202 months

Saturday 13th July
quotequote all
E63eeeeee... said:
Legacywr said:
You won’t get kids in the back of a TT…
This. Only one of your options is actually a genuine four seater. I couldn't get my grandson's car seat in the back of the TT partly because of the space but also the seatbelt layout. Audi says a max height for rear seat passenger of 4'11" iirc, presumably including booster seat, but it's really tight in there.
Only the Cerb is a sportscar either

mk1fan

Original Poster:

10,664 posts

233 months

Saturday 13th July
quotequote all
rottenegg said:
They may be 'cheap' to buy but neither is cheap to run!
Cheaper than the TVRs biglaugh

rottenegg

827 posts

71 months

Saturday 13th July
quotequote all
mk1fan said:
rottenegg said:
They may be 'cheap' to buy but neither is cheap to run!
Cheaper than the TVRs biglaugh
I wouldn't know but I can quite believe it biglaugh

Anything that's decent is rarely cheap though, right? smile

MrBarry123

6,046 posts

129 months

Saturday 13th July
quotequote all
The Scirocco will be much better for space in the back than the TT but then the Scirocco isn’t really a proper coupe; it’s more a 3-door Golf that’s a little bit less practical in every way.

ubbs

664 posts

225 months

Sunday 14th July
quotequote all
mk1fan said:
First world problem.

I would like to get a four seat sports car so our young kids (3 & 6) can be as terrified as my wife.

Ideally I would like a Cerbera but I would prefer not to spend that much.

Any [reasonable] arguments to pick a mk1 TT V6 over a Scirocco R or vice versa?
Scirocco definitely has more room than a TT, we had a 10 plate DSG R with leather and 19’s when they first came out. Took ours to France with a 6 month and 10 year old.
Went well with decent economy.

Dr G

15,409 posts

250 months

Monday 15th July
quotequote all
Scirocco R of those two; good fun little cars with just-enough practicality. I still think they look great.

Sir_Dave

1,502 posts

218 months

Tuesday 16th July
quotequote all
Legacywr said:
You won’t get kids in the back of a TT…
Would have to dispute that, my two in my old mk1 V6 hehe



At that point, they were 3 and 1.

In addition, the rear seats in the mk1 are actually certified as "Group 3" so a 6 year old could probably just sit in them as they are biggrin

573

396 posts

209 months

Tuesday 16th July
quotequote all
The Scirocco drives better. The manual Mk1 TT V6 I had may well be the worst car I've had the displeasure of owning. They're pretty but slow and the heavy donkey in the front makes the chassis even more leaden and uninspiring. If you want something to drive at 5/10ths, is pretty and sounds OK (compared to the 1.8T cars), that's one thing, but don't expect any driving enjoyment. They're a 2 seater too. You can torture kids in them like the picture above but the back is an awful place to sit. With the rear seats down they make quite a useful 'van' though.

You're comparing Mk4 Golf (shambles) to Mk5 (great).

SamG40

65 posts

137 months

Thursday 18th July
quotequote all
We've just swapped the missus TT for an R, I'd echo the above. The R feels much faster despite the on paper extra power not being a lot, it does drive nicer too although not the last word in dynamics. I was surprised how much room there is in the back of the Scirocco but that is comparing it to the TT which is tiny, although saying that its pretty dark back there with the dark interior and the high window line. The TT isn't mega fast and isn't a 10/10ths car but it does have a bit of character mainly from the engine and the interior is lovely and a well screwed together place to be. Dunno whether its because its the new factor so being a bit more heavy footed but the R is so far worse on petrol than the TT, although hoping that will improve a bit now I've just cleaned the valves.