Discussion
Mastodon2 said:
Has it come as a shock to you that such young females are considered acceptable sexual partners in some
parts of the world? Not every society abides by the rules and norms that we consider "right" and "wrong". That doesn't make anyone on this forum a paedophile, or a paediatrician for that matter, it just shows that you are ignorant to how the world outside of Europe functions.
Not just outside of Europe - an age of consent of 14 is relatively common even within the geographic boundaries of Europe.parts of the world? Not every society abides by the rules and norms that we consider "right" and "wrong". That doesn't make anyone on this forum a paedophile, or a paediatrician for that matter, it just shows that you are ignorant to how the world outside of Europe functions.
Roo said:
decadence said:
wow..... couple of guys have some serious st in their closets...
far too defensive about kiddy fiddlers.
You're quite aggressive in all your posts on here, especially the motorsport ones.far too defensive about kiddy fiddlers.
Edited by decadence on Thursday 11th October 20:19
Do you have anger management issues?.
Bitofbully said:
Mastodon2 said:
Has it come as a shock to you that such young females are considered acceptable sexual partners in some
parts of the world? Not every society abides by the rules and norms that we consider "right" and "wrong". That doesn't make anyone on this forum a paedophile, or a paediatrician for that matter, it just shows that you are ignorant to how the world outside of Europe functions.
Not just outside of Europe - an age of consent of 14 is relatively common even within the geographic boundaries of Europe.parts of the world? Not every society abides by the rules and norms that we consider "right" and "wrong". That doesn't make anyone on this forum a paedophile, or a paediatrician for that matter, it just shows that you are ignorant to how the world outside of Europe functions.
decadence said:
You do realise that if you get found looking at under 16 porn on your hard drive it's an arrest able offence and will have you placed on the sex offenders register .... best not go to PC world if you have computer issues you nonce.
That's not very PH in fact it's not very nice at all.Bitofbully said:
decadence said:
wow..... couple of guys have some serious st in their closets...
far too defensive about kiddy fiddlers.
You appear to be a bit hard of thinking. Nobody is defending him, just merely pointing out that you're being a bit of a pitchfork wielding mouth-breather who doesn't appreciate the legal and social differences.far too defensive about kiddy fiddlers.
im stunned at you chaps shouting about the difference between abusing a child of 5 and a child of 13...they are both children in my mind and also legally in the UK.
clearly you don't have kids.
decadence said:
Its amazing isn't it?
When its a Knighted White bloke of 'legend' status, we await further evidence in light of these accusations.....
But when its several Asian men of Pakistani origin we are ready en-masse to claim its something to do with 'their culture' and every middle aged Asian man is perceived to be a person hunting 'cheap white meat'....
What i've realised recently is that we hate child abusers if they 'have them too young' (seems over 13 is fair game) or if they arent white blokes............
I swear there was idiots who believed Asian men invented child abuse...truth is its our society thats to blame for not looking after our kids!
I'm being slightly flippant as usual, but i agree that more evidence needs to come to light, but i'd imagine that as a power figure Sir Jimmy Saville is as larger than life you can get, so i can imagine a young girl putting away these events into her distant memory as who would believe her right?
If we could make a decision based on looks alone....he looks like Paedophile
I couldn't have put it more succintly, you are indeed being very flippant. The basis of your logic is flawed. You evidently are not aware that Saville was interviewed in 2008 by Police in relation to an allegation of a sexual nature. He wasn't charged due to a lack of evidence-basically, it boiled down to his word against that of one other. No independant witnesses. No medical or forensic evidence etc Ergo- no charge.When its a Knighted White bloke of 'legend' status, we await further evidence in light of these accusations.....
But when its several Asian men of Pakistani origin we are ready en-masse to claim its something to do with 'their culture' and every middle aged Asian man is perceived to be a person hunting 'cheap white meat'....
What i've realised recently is that we hate child abusers if they 'have them too young' (seems over 13 is fair game) or if they arent white blokes............
I swear there was idiots who believed Asian men invented child abuse...truth is its our society thats to blame for not looking after our kids!
I'm being slightly flippant as usual, but i agree that more evidence needs to come to light, but i'd imagine that as a power figure Sir Jimmy Saville is as larger than life you can get, so i can imagine a young girl putting away these events into her distant memory as who would believe her right?
If we could make a decision based on looks alone....he looks like Paedophile
The evidence against the Asian gang was overwhelming-hence the CPS charged them and they were subsequently found guilty by a jury of twelve MOP. You appear doubt the fact that these Asians targetted the females due to their race. It is obvious they they exclusively targetted white females, I wonder why?
I simply do not understand how you can arrive at the generalisation that, 'WE,' as a society, have concluded that, "Every Asian man is perceived to be hunting cheap white meat." What evidence do you have to support such a ridiculous piece of supposition?! Absolute nonsense. You compound this ill conceived 'logic,' by alluding to the effect that, 'WE,' "Hate child abusers, if 'they have them too young,' (Isn't that why we categorise these odious types as child abusers?!), or if they aren't white blokes...." Please elucidate on this point and explain how you have concluded that somehow, as a society, we regard white paedophiles as more acceptable than Asian paedophiles. What are you basing your opinion on??
NoNeed said:
decadence said:
You do realise that if you get found looking at under 16 porn on your hard drive it's an arrest able offence and will have you placed on the sex offenders register .... best not go to PC world if you have computer issues you nonce.
That's not very PH in fact it's not very nice at all.NoNeed said:
decadence said:
You do realise that if you get found looking at under 16 porn on your hard drive it's an arrest able offence and will have you placed on the sex offenders register .... best not go to PC world if you have computer issues you nonce.
That's not very PH in fact it's not very nice at all.Somehow I rather doubt it.
Pedmeister said:
decadence said:
Its amazing isn't it?
When its a Knighted White bloke of 'legend' status, we await further evidence in light of these accusations.....
But when its several Asian men of Pakistani origin we are ready en-masse to claim its something to do with 'their culture' and every middle aged Asian man is perceived to be a person hunting 'cheap white meat'....
What i've realised recently is that we hate child abusers if they 'have them too young' (seems over 13 is fair game) or if they arent white blokes............
I swear there was idiots who believed Asian men invented child abuse...truth is its our society thats to blame for not looking after our kids!
I'm being slightly flippant as usual, but i agree that more evidence needs to come to light, but i'd imagine that as a power figure Sir Jimmy Saville is as larger than life you can get, so i can imagine a young girl putting away these events into her distant memory as who would believe her right?
If we could make a decision based on looks alone....he looks like Paedophile
I couldn't have put it more succintly, you are indeed being very flippant. The basis of your logic is flawed. You evidently are not aware that Saville was interviewed in 2008 by Police in relation to an allegation of a sexual nature. He wasn't charged due to a lack of evidence-basically, it boiled down to his word against that of one other. No independant witnesses. No medical or forensic evidence etc Ergo- no charge.When its a Knighted White bloke of 'legend' status, we await further evidence in light of these accusations.....
But when its several Asian men of Pakistani origin we are ready en-masse to claim its something to do with 'their culture' and every middle aged Asian man is perceived to be a person hunting 'cheap white meat'....
What i've realised recently is that we hate child abusers if they 'have them too young' (seems over 13 is fair game) or if they arent white blokes............
I swear there was idiots who believed Asian men invented child abuse...truth is its our society thats to blame for not looking after our kids!
I'm being slightly flippant as usual, but i agree that more evidence needs to come to light, but i'd imagine that as a power figure Sir Jimmy Saville is as larger than life you can get, so i can imagine a young girl putting away these events into her distant memory as who would believe her right?
If we could make a decision based on looks alone....he looks like Paedophile
The evidence against the Asian gang was overwhelming-hence the CPS charged them and they were subsequently found guilty by a jury of twelve MOP. You appear doubt the fact that these Asians targetted the females due to their race. It is obvious they they exclusively targetted white females, I wonder why?
I simply do not understand how you can arrive at the generalisation that, 'WE,' as a society, have concluded that, "Every Asian man is perceived to be hunting cheap white meat." What evidence do you have to support such a ridiculous piece of supposition?! Absolute nonsense. You compound this ill conceived 'logic,' by alluding to the effect that, 'WE,' "Hate child abusers, if 'they have them too young,' (Isn't that why we categorise these odious types as child abusers?!), or if they aren't white blokes...." Please elucidate on this point and explain how you have concluded that somehow, as a society, we regard white paedophiles as more acceptable than Asian paedophiles. What are you basing your opinion on??
Red Devil said:
NoNeed said:
decadence said:
You do realise that if you get found looking at under 16 porn on your hard drive it's an arrest able offence and will have you placed on the sex offenders register .... best not go to PC world if you have computer issues you nonce.
That's not very PH in fact it's not very nice at all.Somehow I rather doubt it.
but it's find to suggest it on a forum...
decadence said:
Bitofbully said:
decadence said:
wow..... couple of guys have some serious st in their closets...
far too defensive about kiddy fiddlers.
You appear to be a bit hard of thinking. Nobody is defending him, just merely pointing out that you're being a bit of a pitchfork wielding mouth-breather who doesn't appreciate the legal and social differences.far too defensive about kiddy fiddlers.
im stunned at you chaps shouting about the difference between abusing a child of 5 and a child of 13...they are both children in my mind and also legally in the UK.
clearly you don't have kids.
Thread already running here, so lets keep it all together
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff