Omega Accuracy?

Author
Discussion

Chris_H

Original Poster:

1,064 posts

277 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
I have an 'Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra >15,000 Gauss' which I bought new in May 2015. It has already been back under warranty in March this year because the hour hand came out of alignment so that it wasn't pointing at the hour baton on the hour. When it came back it was fine and was only gaining 2 seconds a day. It's now gaining 11 seconds a day and is going back again to be regulated. 11 seconds a day is nigh on 6 minutes a month which irritates me. Maybe I'm just too fussy? It's not what I expected from a £4K watch! What sort of accuracy do you get from your Omega?


Zoon

6,653 posts

120 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
How do you store the watch at night?

In order to meet chronometer certification it should be -4 or +6 a day, so it's not right.

Chris_H

Original Poster:

1,064 posts

277 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
Zoon said:
How do you store the watch at night?
I wear it.

Zoon

6,653 posts

120 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
Ok, rules that out then.

CardShark

4,190 posts

178 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
Chris_H said:
Maybe I'm just too fussy?
Nope, you're not being too fussy. It's supposed to run within chronometer specs, seeing as the watch was last worked on in March (though this may have been just to reposition the hand), the watch is only 2 years old, timekeeping has worsened over the last few months and your wearing pattern means that the watch will be in all positions over a 24h period I think you're justified in having an FOC regulation.


Edited by CardShark on Wednesday 19th July 20:02

UnclePat

508 posts

86 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
No, you're not being fussy - that doesn't seem quite right.

Do you wear the watch a lot/daily? I only ask because the watch will be at optimal accuracy at full wind/power reserve. At low reserve, watches tend to speed up, which might explain the fast running. Lots of people aren't quite active enough to maintain a full reserve through rotor auto-winding alone. I really doubt that's the reason though, especially as you wear it at night, but if you hand-wind it fully daily and it still remains that fast, then you'll know it's an issue with the movement.

I also presume you're using an accurate time source to check the deviance? Something like time.is would work. The clock on Computers, mobile phones etc. isn't good enough, as it periodically updates via signal, and thus changes.

Magnetism would also cause a watch to run fast, but given this is a 15,000 Gauss watch, it obviously cannot be that.

It's also worth noting that the -4/+6 COSC deviance is the AVERAGE daily rate over 10 days - a COSC watch is perfectly capable of being +11 secs on one day and still being within spec. In fact, the daily rate can be +/- 10 secs from the average daily rate.

Having said that, it still sounds wrong - I've had non-COSC ETA movements that are easily less than +/-1 sec daily. Co-axial movements require just the right amount of exact lubrication, otherwise they can be problematic.

Chris_H

Original Poster:

1,064 posts

277 months

Thursday 20th July 2017
quotequote all
UnclePat said:
No, you're not being fussy - that doesn't seem quite right.

Do you wear the watch a lot/daily? I only ask because the watch will be at optimal accuracy at full wind/power reserve. At low reserve, watches tend to speed up, which might explain the fast running. Lots of people aren't quite active enough to maintain a full reserve through rotor auto-winding alone. I really doubt that's the reason though, especially as you wear it at night, but if you hand-wind it fully daily and it still remains that fast, then you'll know it's an issue with the movement.

I also presume you're using an accurate time source to check the deviance? Something like time.is would work. The clock on Computers, mobile phones etc. isn't good enough, as it periodically updates via signal, and thus changes.

Magnetism would also cause a watch to run fast, but given this is a 15,000 Gauss watch, it obviously cannot be that.

It's also worth noting that the -4/+6 COSC deviance is the AVERAGE daily rate over 10 days - a COSC watch is perfectly capable of being +11 secs on one day and still being within spec. In fact, the daily rate can be +/- 10 secs from the average daily rate.

Having said that, it still sounds wrong - I've had non-COSC ETA movements that are easily less than +/-1 sec daily. Co-axial movements require just the right amount of exact lubrication, otherwise they can be problematic.
Thanks for the reply. I wear the watch all the time apart from 10 minutes a day when I shower as it currently has a leather strap on it.
I use a radio controlled clock to check it. I know this is correct as I checked it against the BBC time signal and it only updates during the night.
Omega tell me the tolerance is -1/+6 for my movement and seem happy to take it in at their cost to fix it without any additional dialogue.

Podie

46,630 posts

274 months

Thursday 20th July 2017
quotequote all
I have a Railmaster that's pretty bang on. Loses a second over 48 hours.

My Seamaster is in the couple of seconds a day territory.

HaiKarate

279 posts

133 months

Thursday 20th July 2017
quotequote all
Sell it and buy a Rolex Milguass. they are specced at plus 2 to minus 2.

Chris_H

Original Poster:

1,064 posts

277 months

Thursday 20th July 2017
quotequote all
HaiKarate said:
Sell it and buy a Rolex Milguass. they are specced at plus 2 to minus 2.
I just can't get excited about any Rolex I've seen. Horses for courses, but they're not for me.

HaiKarate

279 posts

133 months

Friday 21st July 2017
quotequote all
I can quite understand Chris. The Milgauss is one ugly watch. I truly believe that you get much more bang for your buck with Omega. Very nice watches.

Theoldman

3,598 posts

193 months

Friday 21st July 2017
quotequote all
My Planet Ocean CO-AX was about 5 seconds a day when new.
Now within 1 second a day, so seems to need time to settle down.

Matt99man

384 posts

266 months

Saturday 22nd July 2017
quotequote all
I would not be accepting that kind of accuracy on a modern luxury watch. I purchased a sea master 300m 7 weeks ago and its gained 22 seconds in that time. I think that's superb, far better than my date just ever has been which cost much more!! Great looking piece by the way.

GC8

19,910 posts

189 months

Saturday 22nd July 2017
quotequote all
I am extremely uncomfortable with the term 'luxury watch'. Exceedingly 'American' and cringe worthy beyond words.

Shezbo

594 posts

129 months

Saturday 22nd July 2017
quotequote all
That is rubbish time keeping.....send it back. You cannot make excuses...it is £4k!!


Chris_H

Original Poster:

1,064 posts

277 months

Saturday 22nd July 2017
quotequote all
Omega are sending me out their prepaid packaging, so as soon as that arrives, it's going back!

LC23

1,285 posts

224 months

Saturday 22nd July 2017
quotequote all
Definitely the right thing to do. I have a 8500 movement Aqua Terra and had it regulated at one of the boutiques. I left it with them and they checked it at fully wound and partially wound. This is after Southampton had told me the time keeping was fine when it was running at +5 seconds per day (which is within spec but not great).

Mine now runs at no more than +.5 second per day when worn and left crown up overnight. It usually keeps to spot on time, running slightly slow on the wrist and slightly fast crown up. As long as the person doing it actually takes their time these movements are very accurate.

To be fair to Omega their customer service has always been great in my experience and they are always willing to try and ensure an owner is happy with their watch.

Edited by LC23 on Saturday 22 July 15:49

gregs656

10,816 posts

180 months

Saturday 22nd July 2017
quotequote all
My PO isn't great at the moment, running slow. I really must get it regulated.