New story - lying to insurers.

New story - lying to insurers.

Author
Discussion

SantaBarbara

3,244 posts

108 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
surveyor_101 said:
Gets worth was drink driving and crashed into parked cars, but its ok has he is doing an unknown degree and unknown uni and is predicted to get a 2:1.

You don't add 9 years to your age by accident.

This is a cultural issue with some types were they need to appear to have all the big ticket branded goods.

Clearly he can't afford to run a BMW!
I have never heard of that before

Sa Calobra

37,126 posts

211 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
surveyor_101 said:
Gets worth was drink driving and crashed into parked cars, but its ok has he is doing an unknown degree and unknown uni and is predicted to get a 2:1.

You don't add 9 years to your age by accident.

This is a cultural issue with some types were they need to appear to have all the big ticket branded goods.

Clearly he can't afford to run a BMW!
A cultural issue? I take it you don't know many because that's firmly in the relms of knowledge on the back of a fag packet.

Red Devil

13,060 posts

208 months

Tuesday 12th September 2017
quotequote all
Gareth79 said:
TooMany2cvs said:
If you're so inclined, then check his reg on askmid from your phone or tablet - that'll give you his policy details, rather than simply whether he's covered or not. Then an anonymous letter.
For my vehicle it just shows as whether it's insured, not the insurer.
You're looking at the wrong (free) entry portal: 2cvs is referring to this.
http://stayinsured.askmid.com/about-askMID.html
http://www.askmid.com/askmidenquiry.aspx
https://youtu.be/6sMsBxXC80w

Gareth79 said:
Also is it not illegal to check a vehicle that you aren't authorised to, as the website states?
Yep: breach of DPA 1988 Section 55.

However where there has been an accident then you may have reasonable cause.
http://www.askmid.com/askMID-terms/one-off%20Terms...
It doesn't stop some unscrupulous individual/s from abusing the system though.

austinsmirk

5,597 posts

123 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
I recall having lunch with 5 of my staff some years ago. 2 of us were white, 4 Pakistani. Bare with me for the relevance- this isn't a dig.

the 4 British born Pakistani lads all lived in Bradford city centre. Even as decent men, all in employment, car insurance was nigh on impossible.

Bradford (I think) has the 5 worst postcodes in the top 10 listed in the UK for no ins/ins fraud/crime related to cars.

All 4 of them has their cars registered to out of town, rural location addresses and insured from there. The properties themselves being owned by distant relatives.

They were dead honest, its fraud, but the only way they could even get on the road. We're not talking young lads either- normal men in their 30's/40's driving mundane stuff, in proper normal employment.

Arrius

38 posts

80 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
What the guy did was unethical and should pay the price for his deception and crimes. I don't know how much he saved by lying but I hope the judge teaches him a lesson for what he did about the crime. He could have seriously hurt someone or worse...

TwigtheWonderkid

43,355 posts

150 months

Wednesday 13th September 2017
quotequote all
austinsmirk said:
I recall having lunch with 5 of my staff some years ago. 2 of us were white, 4 Pakistani. Bare with me for the relevance- this isn't a dig.

the 4 British born Pakistani lads all lived in Bradford city centre. Even as decent men, all in employment, car insurance was nigh on impossible.

Bradford (I think) has the 5 worst postcodes in the top 10 listed in the UK for no ins/ins fraud/crime related to cars.

All 4 of them has their cars registered to out of town, rural location addresses and insured from there. The properties themselves being owned by distant relatives.

They were dead honest, its fraud, but the only way they could even get on the road. We're not talking young lads either- normal men in their 30's/40's driving mundane stuff, in proper normal employment.
By "nigh on impossible" you mean possible but expensive. They couldn't afford cover so they committed insurance fraud. When what they should have done is give up their car, or buy a lower rated cheaper car.