What would you do if falsely accused of speeding @ 110mph?
Discussion
Gavia said:
According to a poster further up he says he was pinged at 10:35, but where’s the evidence of that? Not being funny but 10:35 could be the time on the ticket and have nothing to do with the video.
I didn’t hear the copper say where he zapped him, but again, I might have missed it, as 15 mins of dull driving followed by a lot of Chinese (?) and a virtually unintelligible copper in the background doesn’t make for riveting viewing.
10:35 into the clip!I didn’t hear the copper say where he zapped him, but again, I might have missed it, as 15 mins of dull driving followed by a lot of Chinese (?) and a virtually unintelligible copper in the background doesn’t make for riveting viewing.
If you want the full detail, read the Pepipoo thread.
Gavia said:
WinstonWolf said:
My view is you're wrong. He was videod ten minutes in if you read all the way through it.
According to a poster further up he says he was pinged at 10:35, but where’s the evidence of that? Not being funny but 10:35 could be the time on the ticket and have nothing to do with the video. I didn’t hear the copper say where he zapped him, but again, I might have missed it, as 15 mins of dull driving followed by a lot of Chinese (?) and a virtually unintelligible copper in the background doesn’t make for riveting viewing.
WinstonWolf said:
Gavia said:
WinstonWolf said:
My view is you're wrong. He was videod ten minutes in if you read all the way through it.
According to a poster further up he says he was pinged at 10:35, but where’s the evidence of that? Not being funny but 10:35 could be the time on the ticket and have nothing to do with the video. I didn’t hear the copper say where he zapped him, but again, I might have missed it, as 15 mins of dull driving followed by a lot of Chinese (?) and a virtually unintelligible copper in the background doesn’t make for riveting viewing.
Gavia said:
FurtiveFreddy said:
10:35 into the clip!
If you want the full detail, read the Pepipoo thread.
I’m not going on that site full of weirdos. If you want the full detail, read the Pepipoo thread.
Haven’t we still only got the drivers word for it that it was at 10:35 in the video?
There's always someone who comes on PH these days and on page one says "I don't believe a word of it". We're running true to form.
Breadvan72 said:
Silver something, I think he's called. I see him as more of a cultist than a salesman, or do some of the peepipoo saddos charge for their nonsense?
Cultist is probably a better description.I just assumed “salesman” because for anyone to be so keen to promote a site I’d expect them to have a financial interest in driving traffic there.
Gavia said:
WinstonWolf said:
There's always someone who comes on PH these days and on page one says "I don't believe a word of it". We're running true to form.
Mammasaid said:
Gavia said:
FurtiveFreddy said:
10:35 into the clip!
If you want the full detail, read the Pepipoo thread.
I’m not going on that site full of weirdos. If you want the full detail, read the Pepipoo thread.
Haven’t we still only got the drivers word for it that it was at 10:35 in the video?
FurtiveFreddy said:
You can see the red tail lights on the parked vehicle if you use your eyes.
Not in the photo that’s being used you can't. The guy has circled a road sign as proof that it’s the police. Even the lights that can be just made out don’t prove a thing. I’ll leave you lot to it.
Gavia said:
FurtiveFreddy said:
You can see the red tail lights on the parked vehicle if you use your eyes.
Not in the photo that’s being used you can't. The guy has circled a road sign as proof that it’s the police. Even the lights that can be just made out don’t prove a thing. I’ll leave you lot to it.
Gavia said:
FurtiveFreddy said:
You can see the red tail lights on the parked vehicle if you use your eyes.
Not in the photo that’s being used you can't. The guy has circled a road sign as proof that it’s the police. Even the lights that can be just made out don’t prove a thing. I’ll leave you lot to it.
Stoofa said:
LocoCoco said:
Maybe this will help some posters to empathize with people who've been on the wrong end of a mistake made by the police.
The operative word being "mistake".The majority of people on this forum and over at Pepipoo are not the victim of a mistake, are bang to rights and are suddenly sorry.....for getting caught against the odds (with the lower number of traffic officers around).
I don't think anyone wouldn't empathise with somebody at the wrong end of a deliberate lie or mistake - but 99% of the "mistakes" reported on forums are very much not.
It's very frustrating when you're innocent and get punished for something you didn't do or when somebody refuses to believe something which you know to be true.
I don't visit pepipoo but have been the victim of a police mistake.
Mammasaid said:
Gavia said:
FurtiveFreddy said:
You can see the red tail lights on the parked vehicle if you use your eyes.
Not in the photo that’s being used you can't. The guy has circled a road sign as proof that it’s the police. Even the lights that can be just made out don’t prove a thing. I’ll leave you lot to it.
Who’s the plonker now, Rodney?
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff