Jordan Peterson vs Cathy Newman
Discussion
I'm only just catching up with this; surprised it hasn't been shared here already.
Apologies if you're only into bite-sized clips... Cathy Newman of Channel 4 News interviewed Prof. Jordan Peterson and whilst it's half an hour long, I commend you to watch it all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54
I could wax lyrical about how refreshing it is to hear the likes of Peterson on UK TV. But, having subsequently watched some 'commentators' offering their view of the interview, I found that Paul Weston gave the best summary. (Sorry; it's another 15 minutes)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6OBI5JBITM
Amazon order for Peterson's book has been duly placed!
Apologies if you're only into bite-sized clips... Cathy Newman of Channel 4 News interviewed Prof. Jordan Peterson and whilst it's half an hour long, I commend you to watch it all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54
I could wax lyrical about how refreshing it is to hear the likes of Peterson on UK TV. But, having subsequently watched some 'commentators' offering their view of the interview, I found that Paul Weston gave the best summary. (Sorry; it's another 15 minutes)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6OBI5JBITM
Amazon order for Peterson's book has been duly placed!
Eric Mc said:
Who is he and what was the subject being discussed?
From here BBC Womens pay gapBut a separate thread for general discussion of the good (or bad depending on your perspective) doctor could have its uses.
Saw that last night on YouTube. It was the typical Chanel 4 news interview, but for once the other party could manage the interview and stop the false statements, it showed what a load of crap the usual tactics of Chanel 4 and others of a similar style like Faisal Islam employ is.
Cathy has now gone down the victim path and it's pathetic to see. He discusses this in this video https://youtu.be/E6qBxn_hFDQ
Cathy has now gone down the victim path and it's pathetic to see. He discusses this in this video https://youtu.be/E6qBxn_hFDQ
jsf said:
Saw that last night on YouTube. It was the typical Chanel 4 news interview, but for once the other party could manage the interview and stop the false statements, it showed what a load of crap the usual tactics of Chanel 4 and others of a similar style like Faisal Islam employ is.
Cathy has now gone down the victim path and it's pathetic to see. He discusses this in this video https://youtu.be/E6qBxn_hFDQ
As far as I'm concerned she took one for the team. It's too easy to set the mob on an individual when, in fact, it's the dominance of the whole stinking Marxist media and 'liberal elite' in this country which needs to be addressed.Cathy has now gone down the victim path and it's pathetic to see. He discusses this in this video https://youtu.be/E6qBxn_hFDQ
V8mate said:
As far as I'm concerned she took one for the team. It's too easy to set the mob on an individual when, in fact, it's the dominance of the whole stinking Marxist media and 'liberal elite' in this country which needs to be addressed.
Marxist media? Do you get your news just from the Morning Star?V8mate said:
jsf said:
Saw that last night on YouTube. It was the typical Chanel 4 news interview, but for once the other party could manage the interview and stop the false statements, it showed what a load of crap the usual tactics of Chanel 4 and others of a similar style like Faisal Islam employ is.
Cathy has now gone down the victim path and it's pathetic to see. He discusses this in this video https://youtu.be/E6qBxn_hFDQ
As far as I'm concerned she took one for the team. It's too easy to set the mob on an individual when, in fact, it's the dominance of the whole stinking Marxist media and 'liberal elite' in this country which needs to be addressed.Cathy has now gone down the victim path and it's pathetic to see. He discusses this in this video https://youtu.be/E6qBxn_hFDQ
V8mate said:
As far as I'm concerned she took one for the team. It's too easy to set the mob on an individual when, in fact, it's the dominance of the whole stinking Marxist media and 'liberal elite' in this country which needs to be addressed.
Surely you mean "stinking neo-Marxist post modernist media" It's impossible for me to judge. I found her quite annoying during the interview, but I was completely unsurprised by his handling of her. He is typically stone cold with a smile when actually debating. No one gets out alive.
Was she smiling because she truly enjoyed the 'discussion'? Or because she thought a 'victory' could be constructed out of it? I wonder...
Aphex said:
Spot how many times she says 'so you're saying'. She may annoy you quite quickly
A lot of commentators have picked up on her following 'so you're saying' with the complete opposite of what he'd said, thereby accusing her of deliberately trying to twist the discussion.Interestingly, Scott Adams (the creator of the Dilbert comic strip) had a different perspective. He maintained (my paraphrasing) that her behaviour was almost a nervous reaction to Peterson providing an unarguable response to her long-held(?) beliefs, and she, unable to provide a response, simply regurgitated her beliefs back to him as his words.
https://youtu.be/ZnyA5Wn1K_Q
Whether deliberate or sub-consciously, it was disastrous for her.
Goaty Bill 2 said:
V8mate said:
As far as I'm concerned she took one for the team. It's too easy to set the mob on an individual when, in fact, it's the dominance of the whole stinking Marxist media and 'liberal elite' in this country which needs to be addressed.
Surely you mean "stinking neo-Marxist post modernist media" I'm sure my single tag doesn't even begin properly to describe the broad spectrum of damaging influence on our news.
I think it was clear to see that she had no means of dealing with someone with the clarity of thought and position that Jordan Peterson has. Generalised soundbites may have overpowered someone with a less well formed opinion, but she was unable to engage meaningfully with the detail and nuance in the talking points.
In the end there was actually little gained from the interview as she was neither able to debate Petersons points or give him the space to talk through some of his ideas and inform the viewer. To me it highlights the sad state of TV discussion - there's far better on Youtube or podcasts.
In the end there was actually little gained from the interview as she was neither able to debate Petersons points or give him the space to talk through some of his ideas and inform the viewer. To me it highlights the sad state of TV discussion - there's far better on Youtube or podcasts.
Unfortunately Channel 4 and a lot of the usual culprits like the Guardian tried to claim off the back of it Peterson was a loon.
It's worked on some as one called Peterson Alt-Right in the James Damore thread.
But the majority see through it, as shown by the comments on the videos, and there is huge support for his views of the world.
Channel 4 came out saying they've had to recruit extra security regarding the threats Cathy received because of the interview when there is evidence to suggest it was the hordes of angry feminists that directed more abuse at Peterson.
https://hequal.wordpress.com/2018/01/22/cathy-newm...
And here's his own response to it... https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=46&...
It's worked on some as one called Peterson Alt-Right in the James Damore thread.
But the majority see through it, as shown by the comments on the videos, and there is huge support for his views of the world.
Channel 4 came out saying they've had to recruit extra security regarding the threats Cathy received because of the interview when there is evidence to suggest it was the hordes of angry feminists that directed more abuse at Peterson.
https://hequal.wordpress.com/2018/01/22/cathy-newm...
And here's his own response to it... https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=46&...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff