Question about police pensions
Discussion
It's here for anyone who wants the relevant legislation.
Regulation K5 for the '87 scheme.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1987/257/regul...
Regulation K5 for the '87 scheme.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1987/257/regul...
wiliferus said:
ED209 said:
Those who will end up working to 60 will be in the 2006/2015 schemes and the golden handcuff element doesn't exist in those schemes.
Not strictly true. As the 1987 scheme still exists, but has been frozen. I have 17 years locked into that scheme which is still final salary linked. But the time I retire after 40 years service I’ll have 17 years of the ‘87 scheme and 23 on the 2015 scheme.
I currently have 20 years in and as each year passes I feel more compelled to stay.
TheBear said:
How do you have 17 years in a scheme that finished in 2006 but only 20 years service 12 years later and still in the job?
The '87 scheme didn't finish in 2006 - it was just closed to new entrants.It "finished" in 2012 unless you are protected/ benefit from tapering.
I agree though, those figures/ dates still don't appear to stack up.
Edited by Red 4 on Sunday 25th February 14:41
Red 4 said:
TheBear said:
How do you have 17 years in a scheme that finished in 2006 but only 20 years service 12 years later and still in the job?
The '87 scheme didn't finish in 2006 - it was just closed to new entrants.It "finished" in 2012 unless you are protected/ benefit from tapering.
I agree though, those figures/ dates still don't appear to stack up.
Edited by Red 4 on Sunday 25th February 14:41
Red 4 said:
I may have pointed sidicks in this direction.
Sorry.
He's losing traction on the other pension threads and I just felt he needs to maintain his anger and fury.
One day, his head will explode. And that will be the end of that.
I've no idea about the question the OP raised, so won't be commenting on that. I will be commenting if certain other people which to state blatant lies or if there are other misunderstandings about pensions.Sorry.
He's losing traction on the other pension threads and I just felt he needs to maintain his anger and fury.
One day, his head will explode. And that will be the end of that.
Edited by sidicks on Sunday 25th February 15:17
Red 4 said:
sidicks said:
1. I've no idea about the question the OP raised, so won't be commenting on that.
2. I will be commenting if certain other people which to state blatant lies.
1.The question has been answered.2. I will be commenting if certain other people which to state blatant lies.
2.The moon is made of cheese.
Greendubber said:
sidicks said:
Derek Smith said:
pavarotti1980 said:
Someone ask Sidicks. He will be over the moon with this topic. Published sector pension hater of the highest order
No. Don't. Please.
Derek Smith said:
He is not a god. Something else he's wrong about.
I've made no such claims. You have lied about police pensions though. Proof is available for those that want to find it, but I have no intention of digging that up again, unless you carry on as above.Edited by sidicks on Sunday 25th February 15:39
ChevronB19 said:
Just curious, but we sometimes hear about police officers who have been sacked have lost their pension. How does that work, as at least a proportion of it is a salary deduction rather than an employers contribution?
To reassure you, I’m not a police officer and I’m not in the crap!
Annex B provides the easiest summary;To reassure you, I’m not a police officer and I’m not in the crap!
Edited by ChevronB19 on Saturday 24th February 21:43
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/forfeit...
pavarotti1980 said:
sidicks said:
Not a hater, just someone who understand the economics and (lack of) sustainability of the system.
HTH.
Which translates as hater HTH HTH.
pavarotti1980 said:
Are all the cops wrong on this too?
On what? I suggest you don't spoil the thread with silly nonsense.Edited by sidicks on Sunday 25th February 16:04
iDrive said:
Good summary in line with previous comments Edited by pavarotti1980 on Sunday 25th February 16:05
sidicks said:
On what? I suggest you don't spoil the thread with silly nonsense.
I am asking you a question. A question normally necessitates an answer. Yes or no will do. Are the cops who have posted right or wrong in their summary? You may need to actually read the thread first though as you said previously you hadn't. Is forfeiture of DB pensions another area of your expertise?
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff