Alleged dangerous

Author
Discussion

Apache

39,731 posts

284 months

Friday 3rd October 2003
quotequote all
Surely you have some rights of redress, can they make unfounded allegations like that and offer no explanation?

Nightmare

5,187 posts

284 months

Friday 3rd October 2003
quotequote all
Yeah - Carl i now <B><I>REALLY</B></I> want to know what this was all about.

BiBs - doesnt he have any rights to know why he was subject to hassle (which this can only be considered) in this manner?

Because everything about it smells like Haddock.

how well known was you/your bike...?

N

outlaw

1,893 posts

266 months

Friday 3rd October 2003
quotequote all
well carl i hope everythings ok m8

and you get a chance to slap they muppet that started it.

madcop

6,649 posts

263 months

Saturday 4th October 2003
quotequote all
Apache said:
Surely you have some rights of redress, can they make unfounded allegations like that and offer no explanation?


MoJocvh

16,837 posts

262 months

Saturday 4th October 2003
quotequote all
madcop said:


Apache said:
Surely you have some rights of redress, can they make unfounded allegations like that and offer no explanation?







That sucks. Must have been a good one tho' "el 'ombre"

MoJo.

>> Edited by MoJocvh on Saturday 4th October 22:24

hertsbiker

6,309 posts

271 months

Sunday 5th October 2003
quotequote all
They won't tell me - simple as that. They also quoted different days on 2 different letters. Somehow I do not expect to be told, and now it has turned out ok, there are some things I have learnt;-
a) always check the paperwork meticulously
b) don't sign anything
c) write a letter, DO not use normal post
d) be very careful who and where you "show off" to
e) read that thread about how other people percieve your driving/riding
f) don't be intimidated by article 172
g) once "in the clear", drop it.
h) do not trust prosecuting BiB to play fair all the time - they sent out incorrect documents in order to gain a signature even if I didn't declare.
i) DO READ PH, and use your head.
j) Drive *carefully*, and remember - THEY ARE OUT TO GET YOU !!

k) think seriously about that slower car / bike.


MAny thanks to those who gave me the mental edge to carry on, and to Ted for this marvellous website. That's 2 cases overturned.



outlaw

1,893 posts

266 months

Monday 6th October 2003
quotequote all
hertsbiker said:
They won't tell me - simple as that. They also quoted different days on 2 different letters. Somehow I do not expect to be told, and now it has turned out ok, there are some things I have learnt;-
a) always check the paperwork meticulously
b) don't sign anything
c) write a letter, DO not use normal post
d) be very careful who and where you "show off" to
e) read that thread about how other people percieve your driving/riding
f) don't be intimidated by article 172
g) once "in the clear", drop it.
h) do not trust prosecuting BiB to play fair all the time - they sent out incorrect documents in order to gain a signature even if I didn't declare.
i) DO READ PH, and use your head.
j) Drive *carefully*, and remember - THEY ARE OUT TO GET YOU !!

k) think seriously about that slower car / bike.


MAny thanks to those who gave me the mental edge to carry on, and to Ted for this marvellous website. That's 2 cases overturned.





yep and as for point H be very careful they only want to play by the book when there arss is in the shit.

and there use every loop hold then.

streaky

19,311 posts

249 months

Monday 6th October 2003
quotequote all
puzzled/hertsbikerIn your original and subsequent posts you said that you had no knowledge of having done anything. Tivster expressed surprise at this. In your last post you say, "d) be very careful who and where you 'show off' to." Would it be safe to conclude from this that you did in fact know, or have a very good idea, what you did, and when and where you did it?

Silverback Mike and Tivster each have a pants-eating session riding on this

hertsbiker

6,309 posts

271 months

Monday 6th October 2003
quotequote all
nope, those points I made were generalisms. I am STILL GENUINELY UNAWARE of what happened. But thought some of you lot could do with the advice.

I can only assume that someone did not like something I did - not what "we" would call dangerous, but someone didn't like it none the less. Nothing that stood out in my mind, hence my tone: gonna be a lot lower profile from now on.

The only good thing to come out of this is that I think even more about the result of any action - and that even making a bit of engine noise may get you into bother.

Keep it shiney side up folks. Oh yeah, get eating your hat / pants, or whatever you said !!!

silverback mike

11,290 posts

253 months

Monday 6th October 2003
quotequote all
streaky said:
puzzled/hertsbikerIn your original and subsequent posts you said that you had no knowledge of having done anything. Tivster expressed surprise at this. In your last post you say, "d) be very careful who and where you 'show off' to." Would it be safe to conclude from this that you did in fact know, or have a very good idea, what you did, and when and where you did it?

Silverback Mike and Tivster each have a pants-eating session riding on this


Best I get the rice paper ones ready.....

streaky

19,311 posts

249 months

Monday 6th October 2003
quotequote all
Witness statements and photographs will be required!

hertsbiker

6,309 posts

271 months

Sunday 29th August 2004
quotequote all
hi all, I've been mailed by a PH'er in regards to this matter - apparently he has a similar situation of recieving a letter alleging Dangerous Driving... if you guys could offer all the help you can, it would be appreciated. Oh sh*t I've just seen the thread... no worries, I'll write over there as well!