Rollcages - what are the options?

Rollcages - what are the options?

Author
Discussion

573

Original Poster:

311 posts

201 months

Monday 12th February 2018
quotequote all
I have a Superlight R (so imperial S3 chassis). As I understand it, I currently have the 'FIA bar'.



If I wanted to add a cage I seem to have quite a few options. There's one with a diagonal roof bar and one with a 'double D' arrangement.

I've read that the FIA bar is actually quite heavy and one of the cages actually weighs hardly any more.

I've read that one cage fits to existing mounting points or the front hoop fits inside the cockpit whereas one needs the outside skin drilling to fit so isn't as reversable.

I've done quite alot of searching but have met quite a lot of conflicting info. Does anyone have the knowledge to tell me the pros and cons of my options?

Thanks in advance. wavey

sfaulds

653 posts

278 months

Monday 12th February 2018
quotequote all
You have 2 options:

Roadsport (single diagonal) - fits inside screen and weathergear. Needs 1 hole per side in sideskin, and 1 each side in the interior panel.
Superlight (double D) - you can make the screen fit, but not doors or hood. Sits outside the cockpit, needs 4 holes each side. Gives more space and looks better (imho). Despite the name, it's also heavier than the Roadsport.

Confusingly, there was a double-D roadsport cage for a couple of years, but they're much harder to get in and out of, and headroom is badly restricted.

You have an imperial chassis, so metric cages will fit with a little modification.

573

Original Poster:

311 posts

201 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
Thanks. Spent a while at PGM this morning looking at some of the cars there and seeing what the different options look like. Still undecided though. smile

Krismuss

92 posts

187 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all


Superlight cage on a Superlight R

Sensible choice!

Chris

573

Original Poster:

311 posts

201 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
Thanks Chris. Why is it a sensible choice?

Krismuss

92 posts

187 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
If I were going for a full cage on a seven and not worried about weather protection then I would have to be the SLR cage for me, easiest access and it looks the best too (IMHO). I've had one on two out of three Caterhams now. The one without had an FIA rollbar and it never felt as secure to me when pushing on track & road (just my feeling).

Can't say how the three options (RS, RS'DD' & SLR'DD') compare in a crash/roll though!

Chris

BertBert

19,035 posts

211 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
Just out of interest, why do you want to have a cage?
Bert

573

Original Poster:

311 posts

201 months

Thursday 15th February 2018
quotequote all
To stiffen up the chassis and to increase safety.

They also look CAF. smile

BertBert

19,035 posts

211 months

Thursday 15th February 2018
quotequote all
I know it's personal taste, but I wouldn't go for a cage to look cool and stiffen the chassis. In my view it makes a fun car a bit tedious and scuttle shake is not a normal criticism of a Caterham!

573

Original Poster:

311 posts

201 months

Thursday 15th February 2018
quotequote all
This isn't my first rodeo Bert.

Anyone with cages able to offer useful info about weights please? Particularly interested if anyone has had a few different ones on their scales.

Red Seven

156 posts

197 months

Thursday 15th February 2018
quotequote all
SLR cage is about 5kg heavier than an FIA bar and Petty strut.

Aeroscreens

457 posts

226 months

Thursday 15th February 2018
quotequote all
...and a tall single diagonal Roadsport cage is 1.5kg less than a tall single diagonal FIA bar and Petty strut.

Cage goes on for most of the year for sprinting but for touring I revert to the FIA bar (takes me less than an hour to swap between the two)

BertBert

19,035 posts

211 months

Thursday 15th February 2018
quotequote all
Well for a rodeo expert, you don't seem to know much!
573 said:
This isn't my first rodeo Bert.

573

Original Poster:

311 posts

201 months

Friday 16th February 2018
quotequote all
It's weird Bert, I have no idea who you are yet if I look through loads of other threads in here you seem to butt into discussions all the time yet never offer anything constructive.

I've built numerous race cars and have been driving on track for 25 years. I always use ROPS in my track cars. I'm new to Caterhams though and need some advice on cages, which part of that is hard for you to understand and requires you to tell me that I should do something different?

573

Original Poster:

311 posts

201 months

Friday 16th February 2018
quotequote all
...to everyone else offering actual advice and facts, thank you very much.

HustleRussell

24,691 posts

160 months

Friday 16th February 2018
quotequote all
573 said:
I've built numerous race cars and have been driving on track for 25 years. I always use ROPS in my track cars. I'm new to Caterhams though and need some advice on cages, which part of that is hard for you to understand and requires you to tell me that I should do something different?
OK that makes sense.

I think the difference with Caterhams compared to tin tops is that they are very lightweight and softly sprung. The Caterham chassis is not the stiffest in existence but it doesn't need to be.

I bought a Caterham road car which I converted into a race car. I did a trackday with an FIA bar and then used the car with a cage from that point forward. I didn't notice any difference in feel or handling with the cage.

Obviously in a tin top, you stiffen the suspension right up to make it corner on track and then the body can't cope with it, in this instance a cage, particularly one which ties in to the inner wings / strut top mounts, can have a transformative effect.

In a Caterham it just doesn't work that way, whichever cage you buy the front attachment points are always going to be about four feet aft of the front suspension pickup points.

By all means fit a cage for safety or because it looks C.A.F. though.

P.S. I'd never have a hoopy cage, I am 28 years old and not that fat and by the time you have the FIA padding on there they are horrible to get out of.

P.P.S. Consider also side impact bars if required, you may find some don't work with certain cages etc.

rene7

535 posts

83 months

Friday 16th February 2018
quotequote all
The rollbar adds Nothing except weight, Its more a He man Macho fashion accessory - BIN IT:-
Car looks a million times better without it - saved 20Kg of weight, and makes entry easier too - WIN WIN Win IMO:-
>


HustleRussell

24,691 posts

160 months

Friday 16th February 2018
quotequote all
rene7 said:
The rollbar adds Nothing except weight, Its more a He man Macho fashion accessory - BIN IT:-
Car looks a million times better without it - saved 20Kg of weight, and makes entry easier too - WIN WIN Win IMO:-
>

I think the FIA bar looks fine, It doesn’t weigh anything like 20kg, probably not much more than half that- and without any from of rollover protection you are guaranteeing that you and your passenger will be closed casket corpses in the event that you are ever unfortunate enough to end up upside-down or get rear-ended with moderate force.

573

Original Poster:

311 posts

201 months

Friday 16th February 2018
quotequote all
I assumed he was trolling TBH. spin

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

234 months

Monday 26th February 2018
quotequote all
I was thinking about a cage for my SL too but was a but concerned about mass and it being at the top of the car.

By the sounds of it, there is no difference to handling?