Post your unpopular video game opinions

Post your unpopular video game opinions

Author
Discussion

Mastodon2

13,826 posts

165 months

Monday 26th October 2020
quotequote all
Games like Dark Souls, Bloodborne and Sekiro aren't too hard and don't need an easy mode or a "skip boss fight" option. They're not walking simulators. If you aren't good enough to beat a boss or clear a certain section of the game, then you don't deserve to see what is beyond it, you haven't earned it.

Ninja Gaiden Black had an easy mode called "Ninja dog mode" which you would get the option to enable if you died too many times on a certain checkpoint. It would make the game easier, couldn't be disabled after you'd enabled it, would mark your profile in the game so everyone could see you had used it and would make your character wear a pink wrist band for the remainder of the game as a reminder of your shame. I think this was a fair compromise.

Leon R

3,206 posts

96 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all
scrubchub said:
conkerman said:
Calza said:
Leon R said:
Not mentioned before but I thought Mass Effect Andromeda was great (especially multiplayer) and I was a huge fan of the original trilogy.
I second this!
I'll Third it.

A solid game, not exceptional. Solid.
I'd go further and say I Ioved it! I bought it a 12 month after release and it was 100% stable for me. I played it for 90 hours on my playthrough and enjoyed it as much as the earlier trilogy, which I love. Shame it is unlikely to be seen again in the foreseeable.
It is actually quite interesting.

When it came out almost every review started with some variation of 'Following on from the terrible disappointment of Mass Effect 3's ending' and immediately put the new game in a bad light.

Then most of the 'issues' I remember were entirely focused around the cutscene animations with no mention of how the gameplay was even better than ME3.

Honestly I think people just didn't want to like it from the off.

vonuber

17,868 posts

165 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all
Leon R said:
Honestly I think people just didn't want to like it from the off.
There is a lot of truth in that I think.

Don Roque

Original Poster:

17,996 posts

159 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all
Leon R said:
Honestly I think people just didn't want to like it from the off.
It made for a very funny few memes when it was released since it was in such a dreadful state. The facial animations still look bad today.

I didn't play it since it looked so poor and I've had no desire to play it since, despite enjoying the original ME trilogy. Plus it had that racist piece of st Manveer Heir working on it. Bioware should have sacked him during development but his decision to leave after Andromeda was released was probably a jump before he was pushed.

captain_cynic

11,985 posts

95 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all
Leon R said:
It is actually quite interesting.

When it came out almost every review started with some variation of 'Following on from the terrible disappointment of Mass Effect 3's ending' and immediately put the new game in a bad light.

Then most of the 'issues' I remember were entirely focused around the cutscene animations with no mention of how the gameplay was even better than ME3.

Honestly I think people just didn't want to like it from the off.
The thing is, ME:A was a terrible game in it's vanilla form.

At launch it suffered from debilitating bugs and terrible annoyances like the unskippable cut scenes whenever you moved the Tempest to another planet (TBF, this was fixed in an early patch but it should never have been in release).

I wanted to like ME:A but ultimately couldn't. Even at v 1.10 when the developers abandoned the game it was pretty unplayable.

Even ignoring the bland characters, beige storyline, villain that looked like an overgrown infant in a bone costume and the crap voice acting (I'm surely not be the only one who notice the abundance of Antipodean accents)... It was just a chore to play.

Enemies were bullet sponges, half a clip from a machine gun to down a basic enemy is not fun. The crafting system was annoying and mining a bore.

ME:A deserved the panning it got.

But... And there is always a but.

Thanks to the magic of mods, most of the annoyances can be fixed. Notably the mod "bad weapons be gone" which fixed most of the combat issues. There is one for the mining chore as well.

Once that was done I could get past the bland characters and weak story as they were offset by now enjoyable gameplay, excellent atmosphere and eye melting graphics.

It's a sad state of affairs when the community is left to make a game playable... And we're not talking about Bethesda where a game is playable but a bit buggy, ME:A was unplayable and unenjoyable without mods. EA didn't care and Frostbite is not an engine condusive to modding (I.E. it's hard to mod on purpose, so some very dedicated people worked to make the game playable).

Also, for the record, I liked the ME3 ending. It was an ending, a clear, unequivocal conclusion to the story in a world where every major publisher seems to finish up with an "insert sequel here" ending. It wasn't fan service and let's be honest, a bit of a tear jerker but that is what made it good.

Edited by captain_cynic on Tuesday 27th October 10:46

vonuber

17,868 posts

165 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all
I thought the ME3 ending (i player the extended cut with all DLC, so missed all the controversy) was fine as well. I was happy with it right until I got the breath scene; then I was pissed off.

Baldchap

7,626 posts

92 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all
The Switch is the best gaming platform available.

Jim on the hill

5,072 posts

190 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all

Last of Us was terribly boring unless you actually wanted a game which was secretly a move a ladder simulator.

captain_cynic

11,985 posts

95 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all
vonuber said:
I thought the ME3 ending (i player the extended cut with all DLC, so missed all the controversy) was fine as well. I was happy with it right until I got the breath scene; then I was pissed off.
I first played it without the extended cut just to see what all the fuss was about. I couldn't see it.

I thought they were strong endings to a very strong story. They just didn't please the fans killing off Shepard and Anderson.

A Winner Is You

24,974 posts

227 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all
captain_cynic said:
vonuber said:
I thought the ME3 ending (i player the extended cut with all DLC, so missed all the controversy) was fine as well. I was happy with it right until I got the breath scene; then I was pissed off.
I first played it without the extended cut just to see what all the fuss was about. I couldn't see it.

I thought they were strong endings to a very strong story. They just didn't please the fans killing off Shepard and Anderson.
The original ending was a completely nonsensical mess. It completely contradicted the entire Geth and Quarian storyline about being able to co exist, and that we were previously told destroying a relay would set off explosions big enough to wipe out half the galaxy. Not to mention it would have doomed the entire fleet around Earth as they had no way of getting home. Then you had the shot of the Normandy suddenly flying off and landing on some random planet, which meant they must have fled from the battle. At least the redone ending kind of addressed this, but it was still very obvious the whole Star Child was thrown in at the 11th hour and it was never how they'd planned it to go.

As for Andromeda, all I can say is despite playing ME1-3 multiple times, I went through it once and never had any desire to touch it since. Pretty much all I remember is the characters were either bland or annoying, the UI annoying, the planets looked pretty and the comical "my face is tired from........everything" line. It wasn't terrible, just very average.

vonuber

17,868 posts

165 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all
captain_cynic said:
I first played it without the extended cut just to see what all the fuss was about. I couldn't see it.

I thought they were strong endings to a very strong story. They just didn't please the fans killing off Shepard and Anderson.
Except.. as I said, Shepard isn't dead. That was the stupid thing which annoyed me, we went through all that and it was like 'surprise! She's not dead!'

northwest monkey

6,370 posts

189 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all
Mafffew said:
northwest monkey said:
Star Wars Battlefront 2 is an excellent game according to my son & still plays it to this day with his mates.
Errr which one? I wouldn't describe the new version as excellent, although it certainly improved since the awful release. But it doesn't come close to the OG Battlefront 1 and 2.
It's the Star Wars Battlefront 2 game called Star Wars Battlefront 2. I'm not sure how else to explain it. It's not Star Wars Battlefront 1 because that's not on PS4, and it's not Star Wars Battlefront 3 because that isn't out yet. He thinks it is excellent & has been from when he got it (about a month after release for Xmas) so all the initial "Loot Box" drama had died down.

The thread is "unpopular video game opinions" & that's his.

V1nce Fox

5,508 posts

68 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all
vonuber said:
The Witcher 3 is over rated.
I have to profoundly disagree with this one. It's a very, very long burn but the overall experience is very rewarding.

Jim on the hill

5,072 posts

190 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all
V1nce Fox said:
vonuber said:
The Witcher 3 is over rated.
I have to profoundly disagree with this one. It's a very, very long burn but the overall experience is very rewarding.
Well they are unpopular opinions...

V1nce Fox

5,508 posts

68 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all
Jim on the hill said:
V1nce Fox said:
vonuber said:
The Witcher 3 is over rated.
I have to profoundly disagree with this one. It's a very, very long burn but the overall experience is very rewarding.
Well they are unpopular opinions...
hehe

Leon R

3,206 posts

96 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all
captain_cynic said:
The thing is, ME:A was a terrible game in it's vanilla form.

At launch it suffered from debilitating bugs and terrible annoyances like the unskippable cut scenes whenever you moved the Tempest to another planet (TBF, this was fixed in an early patch but it should never have been in release).

I wanted to like ME:A but ultimately couldn't. Even at v 1.10 when the developers abandoned the game it was pretty unplayable.

Even ignoring the bland characters, beige storyline, villain that looked like an overgrown infant in a bone costume and the crap voice acting (I'm surely not be the only one who notice the abundance of Antipodean accents)... It was just a chore to play.

Enemies were bullet sponges, half a clip from a machine gun to down a basic enemy is not fun. The crafting system was annoying and mining a bore.

ME:A deserved the panning it got.

But... And there is always a but.

Thanks to the magic of mods, most of the annoyances can be fixed. Notably the mod "bad weapons be gone" which fixed most of the combat issues. There is one for the mining chore as well.

Once that was done I could get past the bland characters and weak story as they were offset by now enjoyable gameplay, excellent atmosphere and eye melting graphics.

It's a sad state of affairs when the community is left to make a game playable... And we're not talking about Bethesda where a game is playable but a bit buggy, ME:A was unplayable and unenjoyable without mods. EA didn't care and Frostbite is not an engine condusive to modding (I.E. it's hard to mod on purpose, so some very dedicated people worked to make the game playable).

Also, for the record, I liked the ME3 ending. It was an ending, a clear, unequivocal conclusion to the story in a world where every major publisher seems to finish up with an "insert sequel here" ending. It wasn't fan service and let's be honest, a bit of a tear jerker but that is what made it good.

Edited by captain_cynic on Tuesday 27th October 10:46
I played it on the Xbox so I can't agree with unplayable and unenjoyable without mods since mods are not an option and I sunk plenty of time into the game pre and post all of the patches.

Didn't find the enemies anymore 'bullet spongy' than the previous games either tbh.

northwest monkey

6,370 posts

189 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all
Jim on the hill said:
Last of Us was terribly boring unless you actually wanted a game which was secretly a move a ladder simulator.
I've tried this recently & couldn't get into it - was one of the PS Plus games.

Tomb Raider on the other hand was excellent. Good story & lots to do.

vonuber

17,868 posts

165 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all
The last 3 tomb raiders have been the best the franchise has ever been, which is heresy in some circles.

FunkyNige

8,882 posts

275 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all
Unpopular opinion - Retro gaming is boring, the vast majority of games released before 1992 are tedious and repetitive.

FA57 VWT

1,965 posts

43 months

Tuesday 27th October 2020
quotequote all
FunkyNige said:
Unpopular opinion - Retro gaming is boring, the vast majority of games released before 1992 are tedious and repetitive.
Wash your mouth out! rolleyes

I love a bit of retro, real 80’s arcade retro. cool