Random Photos : Part 4

[C&C]

Here are a couple from a recent trip to Eastbourne, and the bottom one from an earlier trip to Hastings.
All taken on EOS-M. Hi res versions on Flickr.

pier3 by conradsphotos, on Flickr



Figure_on_beach6 by conradsphotos, on Flickr


MG_0256_Pan_Fin_54x20in_277dpi by conradsphotos, on Flickr

Edited by C&C on Saturday 19th August 14:35

[Dogsey]

Orb in Style by Mike Gardiner, on Flickr

Inside a Hawksworth Inspection Saloon.

[GroundEffect]

1944 SPITFIRE HF MK IX -- TA805 by Scott Thomson, on Flickr

River Crouch by Scott Thomson, on Flickr

Couple of different subjects in Essex in the last couple of weeks.

[RobDickinson]

Pond Life by Rob Dickinson, on Flickr

[DavidY]

170819 Liverpool Museum Fisheye X100F by David Yeoman, on Flickr

[NDA]

GroundEffect said:

[

Wow!

That's a lovely shot.

[jonvw84]

DibblyDobbler said:

Surprised it took him that long when sailing downhill

Don't have the luxury of a tripod plus I was visiting mates who were at uni there as was little worse for wear, looked straight at the time!

[RobDickinson]

Schools Out by Rob Dickinson, on Flickr

[Dave46]

Josh Brookes over the Mountain

Josh Brookes 2 by Dave Goodhand, on Flickr

and a firebalde

Dan Linfoot by Dave Goodhand, on Flickr

[NDA]

RobDickinson said:

Schools Out by Rob Dickinson, on Flickr

Dozy question.... that's an arm of the Milky Way and we're in another arm of it?

[Tuna]

NDA said:

Dozy question.... that's an arm of the Milky Way and we're in another arm of it?

In real life without the lens distortion, it's straight - we're looking out across the disc of the galaxy, so we see a band of stars, like looking at a CD edge on.

[TheRainMaker]

RobDickinson said:

Schools Out by Rob Dickinson, on Flickr

Epic

[DibblyDobbler]

jonvw84 said:

DibblyDobbler said:

Surprised it took him that long when sailing downhill

Don't have the luxury of a tripod plus I was visiting mates who were at uni there as was little worse for wear, looked straight at the time!

Fair enough - would take just a jiffy to fix in photoshop or similar. Only other thought was maybe position the sky on the upper third rather than smack in the middle

[RobDickinson]

NDA said:

Dozy question.... that's an arm of the Milky Way and we're in another arm of it?

As said the MW is a disk, we are near one edge, this is looking towards the core so you get the best view of it.

[tuffer]

RobDickinson said:

Schools Out by Rob Dickinson, on Flickr

Any more details on the settings?

[RobDickinson]

"Tech data - Canon 6d , ISO 6400, f2, 13 seconds a frame at 35mm. 4 rows of 10 shots, stitched in PT Gui and finished in Photoshop for a final image of 22000x9000 pixels"

[57 Chevy]

RobDickinson said:

"Tech data - Canon 6d , ISO 6400, f2, 13 seconds a frame at 35mm. 4 rows of 10 shots, stitched in PT Gui and finished in Photoshop for a final image of 22000x9000 pixels"

I thought you were going to say iphone 5s

[LongQ]

RobDickinson said:

"Tech data - Canon 6d , ISO 6400, f2, 13 seconds a frame at 35mm. 4 rows of 10 shots, stitched in PT Gui and finished in Photoshop for a final image of 22000x9000 pixels"

So that's about 10 mins Rob?

Do you shoot rows or columns - or is there no choice?

[RobDickinson]

LongQ said:

So that's about 10 mins Rob?

Do you shoot rows or columns - or is there no choice?

yeah about that, usually ~ 22min for a 360, longer if I use a 50mm (10 sec exposures there).

With my iPano I could shoot whatever order I want, this was with the novoflex vr so its far easier to shoot rows as the column adjustment is a pain.

[LongQ]

RobDickinson said:

LongQ said:

So that's about 10 mins Rob?

Do you shoot rows or columns - or is there no choice?

yeah about that, usually ~ 22min for a 360, longer if I use a 50mm (10 sec exposures there).

With my iPano I could shoot whatever order I want, this was with the novoflex vr so its far easier to shoot rows as the column adjustment is a pain.

So that's about 2.5 to 3 mins per row.or, presumably, abut 7.5 to 10 minutes between top and bottom row start and finish.

Does that difference matter much to the amount of effort required for alignment/movement and so on? Or dies the stitching software just deal with it anyway - at least to a satisfactory level of accuracy for your purpose?

Sorry for all of the questions but I could imagine that some patience might be required - especially for a 360.