New TVR still under wraps!

New TVR still under wraps!

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

bullittmcqueen

1,256 posts

91 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
El stovey said:
bullittmcqueen said:
El stovey said:
Do they think,

it looks great and enough people will buy it.
It looks divisive but enough people will still buy it.
It looks divisive but it’s too late/expensive to change anything.
Alternating between these. depending on the time of day and also (in small parts) what we write in this forum. This is my honest opinion. I think everybody has been in a situation like this one (albeit not that extreme) where you invested a great deal of time/effort/sweat and you have no idea whether you're still in line with reality or about to fall off a cliff.
I don’t know the answer but is it actually impossible now to change the looks of the car? Obviously some people love how the car looks and Les is likely one of them but is the car not changing because tvr and enough buyers like it or is it just too late to change it?
Some argue that it it is still be possible, but i'm sure that changing anything substantial is not feasible anymore. Take the smiley air-intake which is among the most criticized things for example:



There isn't much room and before you look you have a ton of dependent things to change as well. There's no time to do that anymore. They need to order (fully specified) parts, fit a factory, secure finance, etc.

And what and how to change in the first place ? Based on which information/requests ? How much certain effort for an uncertain outcome ? Not going to happen.

We were promised a questionnaire, if everybody wants a grille, that might happen.




anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
And that’s exactly what the majority do. It’s a law in accountancy and estate agency that when you reach a certain point in your career, whether you like cars or not, you have to buy a Porsche. That doesn’t preclude the new TVR it just means that they will be selling around the peripheries of that market but that’s still the market that is essential to them.
But you said yourself, they want a Porsche (and a Rolex). It’s about identifiable conspicuous consumption but still quality products.

TVR has never been an aspirational brand like that and internationally it’s even worse.

This for me is where I think they’re going to really struggle. It’s not aspirational enough for Porsche customers, it’s too expensive for young people wanting a wild car.

I think they should have started with something that competes with Porsche boxters and caymans and built up the brand and dealer and support networks before trying to sell something competing with 911s.

Then there’s also the looks.


anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
'Mouth' shape looks vaguely familiar. And those slitty 'eyes'. They won't sell with a silly face. hehe
That’s the whole point, it hasn’t got a silly face like the griff.

swisstoni

16,990 posts

279 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
El stovey said:
swisstoni said:
'Mouth' shape looks vaguely familiar. And those slitty 'eyes'. They won't sell with a silly face. hehe
That’s the whole point, it hasn’t got a silly face like the griff.
Oh, what kind of a face has it got?

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
El stovey said:
swisstoni said:
'Mouth' shape looks vaguely familiar. And those slitty 'eyes'. They won't sell with a silly face. hehe
That’s the whole point, it hasn’t got a silly face like the griff.
Oh, what kind of a face has it got?
One showing purpose and intent.

DonkeyApple

55,268 posts

169 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
El stovey said:
swisstoni said:
El stovey said:
swisstoni said:
'Mouth' shape looks vaguely familiar. And those slitty 'eyes'. They won't sell with a silly face. hehe
That’s the whole point, it hasn’t got a silly face like the griff.
Oh, what kind of a face has it got?
One showing purpose and intent.
That’s the badge. wink

It has the same silly smile of a sunshine bus passenger that the TVR has. The only real difference is this is squinting in the light as it disembarks.

I agree that the car looks stunning but maybe it is as you mentioned the other day that the whole package helps overcome the glasto gurner face.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
That’s the badge. wink

It has the same silly smile of a sunshine bus passenger that the TVR has. The only real difference is this is squinting in the light as it disembarks.

I agree that the car looks stunning but maybe it is as you mentioned the other day that the whole package helps overcome the glasto gurner face.
It doesn’t look the same to me. The differences aren’t much but they make a huge overall impression. I’m 100% sure that it isn’t the badge. As we’ve seen through the thread, we all view the car differently.

I’ve got no great love for Ferrari at all.

spagbogdog

764 posts

260 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
Remove the horse and your'e left with an identical smilely-black hole...

The only issue with the Griff is the lights...they need to be encased within the bonnet-body-work...and not fold down underneath (which is incredibly difficult to understand wtfigo unless youv'e seen it in the flesh)..

That one subtle change is easy to make and far from a complicated design revision..

Les....jump to it PLEASE.....coffeecoffeecoffee

Edited by spagbogdog on Thursday 20th September 12:54

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
spagbogdog said:
Remove the horse and your'e left with an identical smilely-black hole...
It’s not identical at all. That’s why one car looks awesome and the other looks like a gasping fish.

No wonder you like the front of the griff. You’re clearly blind.

Driller

8,310 posts

278 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
El stovey said:
DonkeyApple said:
That’s the badge. wink

It has the same silly smile of a sunshine bus passenger that the TVR has. The only real difference is this is squinting in the light as it disembarks.

I agree that the car looks stunning but maybe it is as you mentioned the other day that the whole package helps overcome the glasto gurner face.
It doesn’t look the same to me. The differences aren’t much but they make a huge overall impression. I’m 100% sure that it isn’t the badge. As we’ve seen through the thread, we all view the car differently.

I’ve got no great love for Ferrari at all.
Nope doesn't look the same to me either. Just one example is the shape of the bonnet. The TVR's curves up in the middle emphasises the gormless mouth, the Ferrari has a minimalist straight form here.

V8 GMS

727 posts

215 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all


I think we have actually agreed on something, that we all like this Ferrari. bowtie

Now, what was this thread about again?...
wink

spagbogdog

764 posts

260 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
Driller said:
El stovey said:
DonkeyApple said:
That’s the badge. wink

It has the same silly smile of a sunshine bus passenger that the TVR has. The only real difference is this is squinting in the light as it disembarks.

I agree that the car looks stunning but maybe it is as you mentioned the other day that the whole package helps overcome the glasto gurner face.
It doesn’t look the same to me. The differences aren’t much but they make a huge overall impression. I’m 100% sure that it isn’t the badge. As we’ve seen through the thread, we all view the car differently.

I’ve got no great love for Ferrari at all.
Nope doesn't look the same to me either. Just one example is the shape of the bonnet. The TVR's curves up in the middle emphasises the gormless mouth, the Ferrari has a minimalist straight form here.


I know what you mean..but there are quite a few optical Illusions going on that don’t tell the whole story.
The Fezza mouth looks far less aggressive imo once the ‘donkey’ has been removed...

MrChips

3,264 posts

210 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
bullittmcqueen said:
Some argue that it it is still be possible, but i'm sure that changing anything substantial is not feasible anymore. Take the smiley air-intake which is among the most criticized things for example:



There isn't much room and before you look you have a ton of dependent things to change as well. There's no time to do that anymore. They need to order (fully specified) parts, fit a factory, secure finance, etc.

And what and how to change in the first place ? Based on which information/requests ? How much certain effort for an uncertain outcome ? Not going to happen.

We were promised a questionnaire, if everybody wants a grille, that might happen.
I see your point but wasn’t the whole aim of Murray’s I-Stream production process designed around being able to go from design to production in ultra quick time?!

I’m with the majority on here, I wanted it to look cool, it doesn’t.
If ever there was a time for Les to listen to the feedback it’s now!

bullittmcqueen

1,256 posts

91 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
MrChips said:
I see your point but wasn’t the whole aim of Murray’s I-Stream production process designed around being able to go from design to production in ultra quick time?!
I think it's not (yet) the production issues that are holding them back. You have type-approval, factory-outfitting, financing, dealing with investors, ordering parts, hiring people, design issues, (all in the right order), etc. But i believe that I-Stream will indeed help a lot in the (admittedly) small part of the production-process where it's actually applicable. Will be a small share of the overall process though.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
bullittmcqueen said:
MrChips said:
I see your point but wasn’t the whole aim of Murray’s I-Stream production process designed around being able to go from design to production in ultra quick time?!
I think it's not (yet) the production issues that are holding them back. You have type-approval, factory-outfitting, financing, dealing with investors, ordering parts, hiring people, design issues, (all in the right order), etc. But i believe that I-Stream will indeed help a lot in the (admittedly) small part of the production-process where it's actually applicable. Will be a small share of the overall process though.
Has istream actually been used before?

scotty1

477 posts

216 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
Looking at the video the mouth feeds the air box above and behind and cools the rad. Can’t believe this can’t be changed. Unless the shape is dictating the metric of air flow sucked in at different speeds..

bullittmcqueen

1,256 posts

91 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
El stovey said:
bullittmcqueen said:
MrChips said:
I see your point but wasn’t the whole aim of Murray’s I-Stream production process designed around being able to go from design to production in ultra quick time?!
I think it's not (yet) the production issues that are holding them back. You have type-approval, factory-outfitting, financing, dealing with investors, ordering parts, hiring people, design issues, (all in the right order), etc. But i believe that I-Stream will indeed help a lot in the (admittedly) small part of the production-process where it's actually applicable. Will be a small share of the overall process though.
Has istream actually been used before?
Not sure. Here's a video, but i have no idea whether this resembles the setup TVR would use:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJFMW0hB2ZI

wanacoop

1,247 posts

222 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
spagbogdog said:
Driller said:
El stovey said:
DonkeyApple said:
That’s the badge. wink

It has the same silly smile of a sunshine bus passenger that the TVR has. The only real difference is this is squinting in the light as it disembarks.

I agree that the car looks stunning but maybe it is as you mentioned the other day that the whole package helps overcome the glasto gurner face.
It doesn’t look the same to me. The differences aren’t much but they make a huge overall impression. I’m 100% sure that it isn’t the badge. As we’ve seen through the thread, we all view the car differently.

I’ve got no great love for Ferrari at all.
Nope doesn't look the same to me either. Just one example is the shape of the bonnet. The TVR's curves up in the middle emphasises the gormless mouth, the Ferrari has a minimalist straight form here.


I know what you mean..but there are quite a few optical Illusions going on that don’t tell the whole story.
The Fezza mouth looks far less aggressive imo once the ‘donkey’ has been removed...
This black and white pic is good, as it highlights the actual lights, and hides the teardrop ducts beneath them.

IMO this improves the look of the front end.

RBV8

414 posts

231 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
It is growing on me but I still see this....sorry I know i've posted my mockup pic before

m4tti

5,427 posts

155 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
Has there not been a poll on the looks yet. Could be time hehe
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED