New TVR still under wraps! (Vol. 3)
New TVR still under wraps! (Vol. 3)
Author
Discussion

MarkwG

5,776 posts

209 months

Monday 13th October
quotequote all
Dudley99 said:
No one is going to buy TVR as a going concern. Have you seen the size of the debts? The Chinese might buy the name from a future liquidator, but nothing else.

No one is going to produce the Griffith. The protoype is far too old now to do anything with.

I don't think the Cyberster is a good example. How many have you seen on the road? They start at £55K, yet there are a selection of cars that are hardly a year old, with under 1k on the clock for under £45K.
I've seen a few, not really been looking though. The statement made was there aren't any performance EVs sports cars. Quoted figures are between 300 & 540 horse power, between 3 & 5 secs to 60 - that's comparable to quite a few ICE performance cars.

bad company

21,142 posts

286 months

Monday 13th October
quotequote all
Viper201 said:
There are still some TVR company names where the accounts are overdue and have not been submitted to Companies House. Admittedly, for the most part they are dormant such as TVR Parts, TVR Finance (no, not a little joke) TVR Racing.

Recently Heritage Farms, Mr Edgar's business, appointed a receiver/manager on the 2nd June 25 but today that has been removed. Worth noting that this business has 4 outstanding loans, one of which is from 2016, one from 2017, one from 2018 and one that is dated the very same day TVR got their Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan (CBILS).

One of the loans was by Coutts & Co in 2017. The receiver/manager was appointed on the 2nd June. The loan was repaid in full on the 18th June.

With loan repayments now going back 9 years, the return of the deposits may be a little late..........
Weren’t the deposits going into escrow accounts?

Viper201

8,236 posts

163 months

Monday 13th October
quotequote all
bad company said:
Viper201 said:
There are still some TVR company names where the accounts are overdue and have not been submitted to Companies House. Admittedly, for the most part they are dormant such as TVR Parts, TVR Finance (no, not a little joke) TVR Racing.

Recently Heritage Farms, Mr Edgar's business, appointed a receiver/manager on the 2nd June 25 but today that has been removed. Worth noting that this business has 4 outstanding loans, one of which is from 2016, one from 2017, one from 2018 and one that is dated the very same day TVR got their Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan (CBILS).

One of the loans was by Coutts & Co in 2017. The receiver/manager was appointed on the 2nd June. The loan was repaid in full on the 18th June.

With loan repayments now going back 9 years, the return of the deposits may be a little late..........
Weren t the deposits going into escrow accounts?
Not escrow but a separate account (allegedly). Previously, deposits had been returned quickly but it seems holders are finding it difficult to get their money back these days.

They could try the new registered offices in Worthing. Rent for the unit is £47,000 p.a and rates of £15,104. It is still showing as available:

https://www.owenisherwood.com/property/e2-yeoman-g...

baconsarney

12,273 posts

181 months

Tuesday 14th October
quotequote all
My main crop Xmas spuds are coming along well biggrin

Jus sayin……

cookie1600

2,393 posts

181 months

Thursday 16th October
quotequote all

TA14

13,750 posts

278 months

Thursday 16th October
quotequote all
What's in the coffin? The TVR company?

GTRene

20,304 posts

244 months

Thursday 16th October
quotequote all
cookie1600 said:
I actuality sort of like that thumbup

lol at the number plate.

QBee

21,952 posts

164 months

Friday 17th October
quotequote all
Loving that it is on Spiders too...just looks right smile

TA14

13,750 posts

278 months

Friday 17th October
quotequote all
QBee said:
Loving that it is on Spiders too...just looks right smile
Although Spiders should have had eight spokes.

cookie1600

2,393 posts

181 months

Friday 17th October
quotequote all
TA14 said:
What's in the coffin? The TVR company?
Well there comes a point where thoughts roll around in your head and you might conclude:

No further prototypes built or tested (OK, one concept demonstrator, possibly one mule)
No obvious support from the original design and build team
No updates to the original design, 8 years having passed since first being shown
No real sign of sufficient financial resources for vehicle compliance and manufacturing
No sign of sub-suppliers or supply chain management
No sign of a third party builder or sub-contractor
No vehicle manufacturing premises secured
No vehicle manufacturing experts on the team
No sales and marketing office
No sales and marketing experts on the team
No continuity spares available from the main company for legacy vehicles
No (or little) recent engagement with owners of legacy vehicles – i.e. potential new customers
No (or little) recent media releases, updates or teasers

All that and in a world since the ‘return’ was first announced, with ever changing legislation, finances, customer expectations, market expectations, environmental expectations and with competitors having new vehicle releases and continuous improvements in that time.

Viper201

8,236 posts

163 months

Friday 17th October
quotequote all
cookie1600 said:
TA14 said:
What's in the coffin? The TVR company?
Well there comes a point where thoughts roll around in your head and you might conclude:

No further prototypes built or tested (OK, one concept demonstrator, possibly one mule)
No obvious support from the original design and build team
No updates to the original design, 8 years having passed since first being shown
No real sign of sufficientany financial resources for vehicle compliance and manufacturing
No sign of sub-suppliers or supply chain management
No sign of a third party builder or sub-contractor
No vehicle manufacturing premises secured
No vehicle manufacturing experts on the team
No sales and marketing office
No sales and marketing experts on the team
No continuity spares available from the main company for legacy vehicles
No (or little) recent engagement with owners of legacy vehicles i.e. potential new customers
No (or little) recent media releases, updates or teasers

All that and in a world since the return was first announced, with ever changing legislation, finances, customer expectations, market expectations, environmental expectations and with competitors having new vehicle releases and continuous improvements in that time.
That's an accurate summary. I edited one line for you. wink

P.S. love the hearse but why is there no medallion hanging from the mirrror? smokin2

Edited by Viper201 on Friday 17th October 16:04

Viper201

8,236 posts

163 months

Wednesday 22nd October
quotequote all
TVR Finance has failed to submit its accounts, now 2 months overdue, so its a First Gazette notice for compulsory strike off.

Looking back at the previous year's accounts, the auditors said this:

"The principal asset of the company is a £1,266,707 loan with TVR Automotive Limited. Without ongoing support, and
repayment of the loan, TVR Finance Limited would not be a going concern.

At 30 June 2023, the auditors of TVR Automotive Limited were unable to obtain adequate comfort that the main asset of
TVR Automotive Limited (£9.6m of non-current intangible assets) was recoverable, as this is dependent on the suceess of
that group's business plan which depends on the successful raising of additional equity and debt funding.

Due to the qualified opinion audit report on TVR Automotive Limited, we are unable to obtain adequate comfort that TVR
Finance Limited will be able to settle financial obligations as they fall due. As such, our audit report is qualified in relation to
going concern."

Gazzab

21,501 posts

302 months

Wednesday 22nd October
quotequote all
Good analysis. The end is nigh. Shame they didn’t make it work - some unfortunate challenges, questionable strategy / execution….the end.


markiii

4,135 posts

214 months

Wednesday 22nd October
quotequote all
Did they actually build anything?

GTRene

20,304 posts

244 months

Wednesday 22nd October
quotequote all
markiii said:
Did they actually build anything?
a story, false hope and one car for themselves.

The Three D Mucketeer

6,853 posts

247 months

Thursday 23rd October
quotequote all
GTRene said:
markiii said:
Did they actually build anything?
a story, false hope and one car for themselves.
I thought GMD built it ?

crosseyedlion

2,345 posts

218 months

Thursday 23rd October
quotequote all
The Three D Mucketeer said:
GTRene said:
markiii said:
Did they actually build anything?
a story, false hope and one car for themselves.
I thought GMD built it ?
They bought a 1 off car from a guy and took 100s of deposits, Millions in loans and investment on promise to make more. Despite having no facility or expertise to do so at any point.

Drawing it out for so long on false press releases whilst taking salaries and public money feels pretty fraudulent.

They've degraded the brand from what was a pretty low point originally and actively damaged the tvr world.

Im angry. The naive russian had nothing on these grifters.


Zeb74

457 posts

149 months

Thursday 23rd October
quotequote all
Gordon Murray still has his deposit.
If he had encountered insincere people during the design and construction of the prototype, would it have beem so?
I'm also sad for this, I put down a deposit and a few years after, despite the fact that I was in position of buying the car, I sold the slot to someone else.
Were they lacking knowledge? Finance? Luck? Probably a bit of all 3.
I don't have the feeling that they were trying to fool people, they probably didn't understand all the implications.

Lefty

18,956 posts

222 months

Thursday 23rd October
quotequote all
I wonder if the brand will ever become resurrectable? A low volume, simple sports car manufacturer akin to Morgan, Caterham or Ariel.

Will it ever be possible to buy the name for a reasonable sum?

Would anyone ever buy a new TVR in the future given this fiasco or have the current owners completely fked all goodwill the name once had?

It’s all so sad to see a marque fail like this.

bad company

21,142 posts

286 months

Thursday 23rd October
quotequote all
crosseyedlion said:
They bought a 1 off car from a guy and took 100s of deposits, Millions in loans and investment on promise to make more. Despite having no facility or expertise to do so at any point.

Drawing it out for so long on false press releases whilst taking salaries and public money feels pretty fraudulent.

They've degraded the brand from what was a pretty low point originally and actively damaged the tvr world.

Im angry. The naive russian had nothing on these grifters.
Worst still the website is still there and available to take more deposits.