COOL CLASSIC CAR SPOTTERS POST!!! Vol 2
Discussion
S47 said:
I'd have thought late 50's Austin Cambridge for sure - it has indicators which came in around 1956??
I'm sure the anoraks will be along soon to enlighten us all
>
If I owned the shed next to it - I'd be selling that for sure, design on it looks so awful, compared to the Austin
I'm sure the anoraks will be along soon to enlighten us all
>
If I owned the shed next to it - I'd be selling that for sure, design on it looks so awful, compared to the Austin
S47 said:
I'd have thought late 50's Austin Cambridge for sure - it has indicators which came in around 1956??
I'm sure the anoraks will be along soon to enlighten us all
>
If I owned the shed next to it - I'd be selling that for sure design on it looks so awful, compared to the Austin
Anorak alert. I'm sure the anoraks will be along soon to enlighten us all
>
If I owned the shed next to it - I'd be selling that for sure design on it looks so awful, compared to the Austin
As far as I can make out it's a very early (1954 was the first year) Austin A40 Cambridge, though I've no idea where the 1600cc engine came from in the data above as they were a 1200. The A50 Cambridge which looked remarkably similar had a 1500 engine though no over-riders on the bumpers from what I can remember (or read on Wiki)
Ugly sad looking little cars, though I still hanker after one for some strange reason... Incidentally, in their day these cars were not small but pretty much mid - full sized.
S47 said:
Daveenty
How come it has indicators? - I thought they were introduced on 1956 models, in Austins case A30-A35 being a good example of this?
It's perfectly possible to fit indicators to a car which didn't previously have them. Many owners do this because other road users don't understand hand signals or idiot sticks.How come it has indicators? - I thought they were introduced on 1956 models, in Austins case A30-A35 being a good example of this?
Butter Face said:
I did a car cleaning and driving summer job as a student many moons ago, and I remember vividly a badly converted second hand Mini turbo automatic passing through the place. It remains without rival the worst car I have ever driven, . A mini may be a great car. Turbo charging may also have it's merits. Automatic transmission is a brilliant thing. We all love a manual choke. Short wheelbase? Fine for a Sport Quattro or Ferrari 250. However, all in one single badly made cocktail was a recipe for a total mayhem - it really was shocking. I'm surprised there are any left - surely by now it would have careered into a hedge as the driver hung on grimly to the leather bound ornament flailing about between his knees?Gassing Station | Classic Cars and Yesterday's Heroes | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff