Another mystery car

Author
Discussion

Scrump

21,996 posts

158 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
Wow!

Lily the Pink

5,783 posts

170 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
Scrump said:
Wow!
Exactly what I was thinking.

CanAm

9,190 posts

272 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
Ford 7Y, wheelbase 78”............ Off you go all you CAD experts.

Abbott

2,386 posts

203 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
Time to close the thread?

Tre Zero

440 posts

40 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
Abbott said:
Time to close the thread?
Only when the car is found in the outbuilding near Bournemouth .

threespires

Original Poster:

4,292 posts

211 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
alfgarnett said:
The car was built between 1961 and 1962. I was built very quickly I hasten to add, by a guy called Clive Bowers.

The story of the car’s origin stems from their obsession with the RAF. In those days you couldn’t just buy a private registration number off the internet, so when Clive’s dad saw a virtually worthless old car for sale with the registration number RAF 33, he bought it. It was a decrepit Ford 7Y, which was subsequently parked up somewhere at the family home, which was a smallholding, hence no shortage of space and pretty much forgotten about.

A bigger help may be the registration number of the car, which was definitely RAF 33 and would have shown up as a Ford.
Wonderful, thanks for posting.....

Hawkshaw

161 posts

35 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
Absolutely wonderful, but the wheelbase of a Ford 7Y is 90 inches, not 78 inches. The design makes a lot more sense on a 90 inch wheelbase.

Edited by Hawkshaw on Monday 21st June 17:03

Lily the Pink

5,783 posts

170 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
Hawkshaw said:
Absolutely wonderful, but the wheelbase of a Ford 7Y is 90 inches, not 78 inches.
According to Wikipedia it's 78".
And the front screen certainly looks like the rear from a Metropolitan.

Hawkshaw

161 posts

35 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
[quote=Lily the Pink]
According to Wikipedia it's 78".
And the front screen certainly looks like the rear from a Metropolitan.[/quote

On this rare occasion Wikipedia is wrong.

All the small side valve Fords were either 90" or 94" wheelbase. The 7Y Eight became the E93A Anglia and then the 103E Popular, all on basically the same chassis with 90" wheelbase.

thegreenhell

15,320 posts

219 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
So it's not a Sunbeam Alpine then?

Yertis

18,046 posts

266 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
Tre Zero said:
Abbott said:
Time to close the thread?
Only when the car is found in the outbuilding near Bournemouth .
Yes, why give up when we're so close?

Duke Caboom

2,015 posts

199 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
Incredible! Almost literally.

Yertis

18,046 posts

266 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
Did anyone say 'Nash Metropolitan Rear Screen" in all the screen deliberations?

MarkwG

4,848 posts

189 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
I live just outside Bournemouth...scratchchin - could spend the rest of eternity hunting through old out buildings around here though...frown

Zirconium

80 posts

89 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
Blimey I'm stunned!

I'm just hoping that Alf Garnett is not some kind of troll. Seems like quite a long time between joining on the 5th of May and posting today, but apparently an older gentleman and not that internet savvy, so maybe explicable.

This needs to be tracked down if it still exists!

uk66fastback

16,534 posts

271 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
MarkwG said:
I live just outside Bournemouth...scratchchin - could spend the rest of eternity hunting through old out buildings around here though...frown
Well get on with it then!

restoman

937 posts

208 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
I have a question . . . . . .

This revelation has come from a new member who was directed to this website because of THE car. . . . . Why has it taken from 5th May (when the member registered) until the 21st June to post this . . . . . . ?

uk66fastback

16,534 posts

271 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
Yertis said:
Did anyone say 'Nash Metropolitan Rear Screen" in all the screen deliberations?
A certain someone was so convinced it was a rear screen from a Minx that they bought one online ...

Let's hope Alf is kosher, that's all I'll say. I want him to be. Does everything else stack up? The low bonnet etc. What's the rear screen off? Can someone just 'build gullwing doors' that work? If you've got a background in aluminium shaping ten you probably can, but it was assembled quickly - this would still have taken a fair while I would have thought. Depends on the definition of 'quickly'.

All you Dorset PHers ... draw a five-mile radius around Bournemouth, divide into squares and give each of you a certain number - we'll have it found by the weekend!

Hawkshaw

161 posts

35 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
Due diligence, etc, but I think dimensionally it would stack up IF the wheelbase is 90 inches - so we have to ask why the super-accurate computer scaling gives the wheebase as 78 inches.

If anyone is seriously interested in looking perhaps Alf would be prepared to give a few clues to the location off-forum.

Yertis

18,046 posts

266 months

Monday 21st June 2021
quotequote all
Who else has tried RAF 33 on the DVLA doo-dah?