Electrifying Classic Cars

Author
Discussion

DonkeyApple

55,160 posts

169 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
Escapegoat said:
lowdrag said:
Here's a thought for you all:-
Um... what am I looking at?
It’s an electric motor in a Beetle or 911 isn’t it? It looks like one of those 70s under bonnet shots of a tiny 4 pot lost in a big engine bay.

Dave Hedgehog

14,546 posts

204 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
Escapegoat said:
lowdrag said:
Here's a thought for you all:-
Um... what am I looking at?
It’s an electric motor in a Beetle or 911 isn’t it? It looks like one of those 70s under bonnet shots of a tiny 4 pot lost in a big engine bay.
tesla unit in a 911


DonkeyApple

55,160 posts

169 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
Dave Hedgehog said:
DonkeyApple said:
Escapegoat said:
lowdrag said:
Here's a thought for you all:-
Um... what am I looking at?
It’s an electric motor in a Beetle or 911 isn’t it? It looks like one of those 70s under bonnet shots of a tiny 4 pot lost in a big engine bay.
tesla unit in a 911

Is that a big battery pack behind the rear axle to maintain handling heritage?

bigdog3

1,823 posts

180 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
skeeterm5 said:
I have thought about it for my mk2 Cortina, but is really is cost prohibitive.
Excellent rofl

bigdog3

1,823 posts

180 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
Yertis said:
Sod that. I'd rather scrap it. The sound of the engine is what gives both my classics soul. Without the straight-six the TR6 is little more than a low-slung, tarted up milk-float.
Spot on thumbup Electrifying classic cars is utterly futile and completely destroys their reason to exist silly

T-195

2,671 posts

61 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
Blib said:
I investigated electrifying Mrs B's 1970, Fiat 500. A suitable system would cost about £20k.

I'll look again when there's more players in the market.
I expect the cars crash worthiness would only be improved installing some heavy batteries too.

The Surveyor

7,576 posts

237 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
Dave Hedgehog said:
DonkeyApple said:
Escapegoat said:
lowdrag said:
Here's a thought for you all:-
Um... what am I looking at?
It’s an electric motor in a Beetle or 911 isn’t it? It looks like one of those 70s under bonnet shots of a tiny 4 pot lost in a big engine bay.
tesla unit in a 911

Except the top one is clearly a Beetle, and the bottom one is a 911.

singlecoil

33,530 posts

246 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
bigdog3 said:
Yertis said:
Sod that. I'd rather scrap it. The sound of the engine is what gives both my classics soul. Without the straight-six the TR6 is little more than a low-slung, tarted up milk-float.
Spot on thumbup Electrifying classic cars is utterly futile and completely destroys their reason to exist silly
Having owned and enjoyed several Triumphs over the years, getting rid of that staight 6 would be a step in the right direction AFAIAC. It was just Triumph using the nearest to a suitable engine they could get hold of, basically its a pre-war design in a 60s car

Blib

43,970 posts

197 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
T-195 said:
Blib said:
I investigated electrifying Mrs B's 1970, Fiat 500. A suitable system would cost about £20k.

I'll look again when there's more players in the market.
I expect the cars crash worthiness would only be improved installing some heavy batteries too.
A fair point, well made. hehe

bigdog3

1,823 posts

180 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
This must be the saddest thread on PistonHeads weeping

Yertis

18,040 posts

266 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
singlecoil said:
Having owned and enjoyed several Triumphs over the years, getting rid of that straight 6 would be a step in the right direction AFAIAC.
irked

[clicks [report] ]

wink

DonkeyApple

55,160 posts

169 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
bigdog3 said:
This must be the saddest thread on PistonHeads weeping
It would be if everyone was thinking all classics should be converted but as that isn’t the case then it’s not really sad at all but an interesting discussion.

Driving a classic car is about a driving experience. For some it’s attempting to relive a lost era to the nth degree, for others it’s about capturing some of that and blending it with the modern world.

Take an old car and stick an electric motor in it and you’re going to create a new driving experience. That’s not remotely sad or bad but precisely what messing about with cars is all about. It’s about trying new things, creating new things, blending the new with the old.

For those who want total originality there are museums in practically every city with original old cars in them to look at.

Sticking an electric motor in one of many classic cars isn’t really the same as putting eyebrows on the Mona Lisa. wink

soxboy

6,187 posts

219 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
The conversion is something that I keep mulling over as an interesting project for a Range Rover Classic.

The diesel model is an immensely uninspiring vehicle and a Nissan Leaf drivetrain has more power and makes a much more pleasant noise. At the same time the Rangie has plenty of bonnet space to fit the kit and some of the batteries and plenty of space at the back for the remaining batteries.

It would make for a much more pleasant local potterer and the cost of replacing the diesel lump with an electric motor isn’t going to be a huge amount more than replacing it with a Rover V8.
The 1980s one on the Fully Charged Show looks good and you make a valid point about replacing an awful engine. If it's the worst part of the car it's a great idea given that the 2.4VM diesel lump has virtually no redeeming features (diesel clatter, still poor fuel consumption, poor reliability) and you replace it with an electric motor that has all the characteristics that are ideal for a car like a Range Rover (low noise, huge torque, significant economy improvement).

(now off to spend the rest of the afternoon on Leboncoin looking at 2 door TDs)

bigdog3

1,823 posts

180 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
It would be if everyone was thinking all classics should be converted but as that isn’t the case then it’s not really sad at all but an interesting discussion.

Driving a classic car is about a driving experience. For some it’s attempting to relive a lost era to the nth degree, for others it’s about capturing some of that and blending it with the modern world.

Take an old car and stick an electric motor in it and you’re going to create a new driving experience. That’s not remotely sad or bad but precisely what messing about with cars is all about. It’s about trying new things, creating new things, blending the new with the old.

For those who want total originality there are museums in practically every city with original old cars in them to look at.

Sticking an electric motor in one of many classic cars isn’t really the same as putting eyebrows on the Mona Lisa. wink
bigdog3 said:
Electrifying classic cars is utterly futile and completely destroys their reason to exist silly

singlecoil

33,530 posts

246 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
bigdog3 said:
This must be the saddest thread on PistonHeads weeping
Nonsense, the saddest thread on Pistonheads is the "Do you have a tattoo?" thread.

Yertis

18,040 posts

266 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
OK I'm prepared to concede that where the engine is crap/souless then electric is an acceptable option.

I'd accept (OK, quite like) electric versions of the following cars:

NSU Ro80
Rover P6 (like in Gattaca)
Citroen DS (also like in Gattaca)
VW Beetle
Those old Saabs that teachers used to drive

I'm sure there are others.

DonkeyApple

55,160 posts

169 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
bigdog3 said:
DonkeyApple said:
It would be if everyone was thinking all classics should be converted but as that isn’t the case then it’s not really sad at all but an interesting discussion.

Driving a classic car is about a driving experience. For some it’s attempting to relive a lost era to the nth degree, for others it’s about capturing some of that and blending it with the modern world.

Take an old car and stick an electric motor in it and you’re going to create a new driving experience. That’s not remotely sad or bad but precisely what messing about with cars is all about. It’s about trying new things, creating new things, blending the new with the old.

For those who want total originality there are museums in practically every city with original old cars in them to look at.

Sticking an electric motor in one of many classic cars isn’t really the same as putting eyebrows on the Mona Lisa. wink
bigdog3 said:
Electrifying classic cars is utterly futile and completely destroys their reason to exist silly
Apart from that it isn’t and it doesn’t in all cases.

Pulling out a 4 pot and sticking in a V8 makes some people happy with a new experience and doing the same with an electric motor is really no different.

You wouldn’t want everyone to do it but if someone wants to do it to their own car and create a different classic car experience then go for it.

DonkeyApple

55,160 posts

169 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
EVs are really only a benefit to society when replacing all the local potterers, suburban second cars that never do big mileages. ICE will remain for years for all the other stuff. Households which can only afford one car will just have to decide whether to use public transport for urban journeys and have an ICe for the other stuff or whether to have an EV for every day usage and hire an ICE for the longer journeys.

Londoners already make these choices so it’s not difficult.

The reality that will dawn over the coming decade is that ICe is here to stay for a long time and that EVs will just make up a significant share of the market and be used where they are more efficient in terms of cost, time and pollution.

Our classics are totally irrelevant in the grand scheme of things but there is always the risk that it’s a hobby that gets picked on purely for spite to stick it to rich scum who are to blame for everyone’s problems in life.

bigdog3

1,823 posts

180 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
bigdog3 said:
Electrifying classic cars is utterly futile and completely destroys their reason to exist silly
Apart from that it isn’t and it doesn’t in all cases.
futile: ineffectual; useless; incapable of producing any result; not successful:

Unless self gratification or taking the moral high ground can be considered useful, futile applies to electrifying classic cars. Beyond gesturing, literally there is no point.

DonkeyApple

55,160 posts

169 months

Friday 23rd August 2019
quotequote all
bigdog3 said:
DonkeyApple said:
bigdog3 said:
Electrifying classic cars is utterly futile and completely destroys their reason to exist silly
Apart from that it isn’t and it doesn’t in all cases.
futile: ineffectual; useless; incapable of producing any result; not successful:

Unless self gratification or taking the moral high ground can be considered useful, futile applies to electrifying classic cars. Beyond gesturing, literally there is no point.
Ah. Politics. I see. Forget the politics as it’s for the silly folk, especially all the envirotwaddle about buying more stuff to solve the problem of people buying too much stuff.

If you can get beyond the DM thinking then you’ll be able to understand that sticking an electric motor in an old car might be a bit of fun and of interest to some car enthusiasts. wink