Morris Marina - was it really that bad?

Morris Marina - was it really that bad?

Author
Discussion

hilly10

7,116 posts

228 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
Sticks. said:
Was it the early cable linkage? Iirc it was one of the first 5 gear cars widely available. It was the first car I remember with a dip-able mirror. A friend has several.

A nice Hubnut review https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtihHAa0WmY
Yes early cable linkage with 5 speeds, it made all the more annoying it was an extra ratio to find in the porridge


Gojira

899 posts

123 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
hilly10 said:
Sticks. said:
Was it the early cable linkage? Iirc it was one of the first 5 gear cars widely available. It was the first car I remember with a dip-able mirror. A friend has several.

A nice Hubnut review https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtihHAa0WmY
Yes early cable linkage with 5 speeds, it made all the more annoying it was an extra ratio to find in the porridge
the rod linkage they replaced it with was much less bad...

right up until the roll pin holding the rod into its socket dropped out at 70 in fifth on the motorway, 30 miles from home! eek

Guess how I know? rofl

5Valve

73 posts

174 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
The Marina was a car of it's time, built on Ford principles of simple design, proven units, and cheap to service. (Not something that BMC et al was used to producing ) I had two Marina TC's, from 1972 to 1975, my little black book tells me I did 43K miles and 46K miles in them respectively. Nothing broke, nothing went wrong, and, the only work they had done was normal servicing to the book. I specifically remember what fuel consumption I got, 33mpg on average, because petrol was 33pence per gallon, The coke bottle GXL I had previously could only give 25/26mpg at best. N.B. you could get three gallons for a pound!!! ( 13.62litres for the uninitiated). Performance wise the TC was on a par with the 2 litre Fords, of the time, on cross country 'Blats', of which there were many, you could call it a draw. Just a true reflection of two of my company cars from the early 70's.

Escort3500

11,896 posts

145 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
I had the misfortune to run a ‘74 1.8 TC saloon in the eighties. Utterly awful handling even when I fitted a Spax suspension kit. Dreadful interior, lumpy gearbox and loved rust (though in truth most cars of this era corroded badly). The only positive I can remember was the exhaust note.

spaximus

4,231 posts

253 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
The marina and the Ital that followed were okay for their target audience, that was people trading up from equally horrid BL cars. I worked for Kennings in Rotherham when they were new and the build quality was awful, they leaked like sieves on screens and joints.

The Coupe was spoilt by short doors and if they were fixed and it had better handling it would have sold a lot more. Remember back then there was a lot of loyalty to things made in England but they were a cheap car of it's time.

The vans and pick ups were fine cheap rugged throw away. Previous company I worked for had a 100 or so Marinas, vans and pickups and they were popular with customers

lowdrag

12,889 posts

213 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Gojira said:
hilly10 said:
Sticks. said:
Was it the early cable linkage? Iirc it was one of the first 5 gear cars widely available. It was the first car I remember with a dip-able mirror. A friend has several.

A nice Hubnut review https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtihHAa0WmY
Yes early cable linkage with 5 speeds, it made all the more annoying it was an extra ratio to find in the porridge
the rod linkage they replaced it with was much less bad...

right up until the roll pin holding the rod into its socket dropped out at 70 in fifth on the motorway, 30 miles from home! eek

Guess how I know? rofl
This is becoming a quite joyous thread as we walk down memory lane. I had to transport some furniture and the neighbour lent me his Maxi for the weekend. Not only was it a cable-operated box, but the said box was attached to the 1500cc engine so there wasn't enough power to stir the said pudding. It is the only time I was happy to get my Marina back!

Tony427

2,873 posts

233 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Take one Marina 1.8 TC.

Add Marlin Roadster Kit.

Stir well and you have a relatively light 30's looking sports car with Morris Minor underpinnings, and an entry into a life of nailing kit cars together in a shed.

Happy days.

Cheers,

Tony


Escort3500

11,896 posts

145 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Tony427 said:
Take one Marina 1.8 TC.

Add Marlin Roadster Kit.

Stir well and you have a relatively light 30's looking sports car with Morris Minor underpinnings, and an entry into a life of nailing kit cars together in a shed.

Happy days.

Cheers,

Tony
Didn’t realise the Roadster also used Marina running gear. A chap near us had a late ‘70’s version with Herald drivetrain (and possibly chassis?). From memory, his main grouse was the rather poor and a leaky hood smile

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
cardigankid said:
When I think of the TR7 I think gutless, phoney styling, poser's car for the ignorant.
That's a rather sweeping statement.
You've got form on being a tt.

Shezbo

600 posts

130 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Marina...yep truly dreadful...

I cannot think of any redeeming feature?

Peter3442

422 posts

68 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
It seems that the Marina wasn't totally bad as

- From the various posts, a lot of people had a great deal of enjoyment from them in the day. Some of the fun arose from the car's shortcomings.
- They were essentially a dressed up Morris Minor, which most consider a significant classic (though of couple of decades earlier).
- They provide a cheap supply of parts to restore/upgrade Minors and for building kits cars.

Etypephil

724 posts

78 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Shezbo said:
Marina...yep truly dreadful...

I cannot think of any redeeming feature?
Quicker (in TC guise) than a BMW 2002tii, and 100 times more reliable.

sideways man

1,315 posts

137 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Well, my orange marina 1.8 was a swap for a a £100 motorbike in 1982. The 1.8 was the fastest car for cheapest insurance, very important when you’re a 18 year old poor apprentice. It would do 100mph.... just! It drank oil for a laugh and understeered for Britain. And the gearbox blew up.
Sold it for £300, so actually made a profit.

My mate had a metallic brown 1.8 TC with a wooden steering wheel. I was so jealous laugh

hilly10

7,116 posts

228 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
My biggest criticism of the Marina was, that it was rusty after two years old

Yertis

18,046 posts

266 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Raygun said:
That's a rather sweeping statement.
You've got form on being a tt.
As has been said – the TR7s time has come, at last.

Mr Squarekins

1,045 posts

62 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
My dad was a draughtsman at BL in the 1970s and 80s. He'd get a new company car every 3-6 months. I guess it was a way to keep sales figures up, get employees to have them.

I recall from my childhood our fleet being:

Allegro
Maxi
Mgb Roadster ( yes company car)
Ital saloon
Ital estate
Princess (multiple)
Triumph Acclaims (multiple)
Sd1 Rover
Rover 200s (multiple)
Metros, Maestros and Montegos of all varieties including turbos of all.

He obviously came to his senses at some point, opted out with a string of Mercs, BMWs and Porsche.

I loved them all. However, i pleaded for him to get a company TR7, but he'd seen them designed and built and even he had a limit! wink


Escort3500

11,896 posts

145 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Raygun said:
cardigankid said:
When I think of the TR7 I think gutless, phoney styling, poser's car for the ignorant.
That's a rather sweeping statement.
You've got form on being a tt.
Phoney styling. Bizarre comment.

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Yertis said:
Raygun said:
That's a rather sweeping statement.
You've got form on being a tt.
As has been said – the TR7s time has come, at last.
If we were transported back in time to the late 70s for us low wage earners we could only dream of owning a TR7, had to make do with a Marina.It was forty + years ago, you can't start comparing Marinas with cars made in the late 30s like we're comparing Marinas with todays cars. All cheap cars had faults in the late 70s.

Yertis

18,046 posts

266 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Escort3500 said:
Phoney styling. Bizarre comment.
I think he's referring to the idea that the TR7 is 'pretending to be mid-engined'.

Which it may be and I must agree that the fixed head TR7 looks a bit awkward. Blame US legislators for that. But the TR7 drop-head looks good from any angle. Certainly better than that 'new' MG which I've just realised has passed from everyday sight.

I'm pretty sure the TR7 is a lot easier to live with than earlier TRs, when it's working properly. Driving the TR6 isn't relaxing.

aeropilot

34,574 posts

227 months

Saturday 16th November 2019
quotequote all
Etypephil said:
Shezbo said:
Marina...yep truly dreadful...

I cannot think of any redeeming feature?
Quicker (in TC guise) than a BMW 2002tii,
rofl

Only when pushed off the edge of a cliff maybe.