Big Ben to be silent for four years

Big Ben to be silent for four years

Author
Discussion

hornetrider

Original Poster:

63,161 posts

205 months

Monday 14th August 2017
quotequote all
What the fk are they doing. Rebuilding it from the ground up?

I'm no campanologist but Jesus Christ. Four years! And 30m! That's thirty million pounds. It's easy to throw away figures like that in amongst overall govt expenditure and costlier projects but that is a lot of cash.

Jonesy23

4,650 posts

136 months

Monday 14th August 2017
quotequote all
You try doing a major cosmetic and functional refurb and structural repair of a grade 1 listed UNESCO world heritage site and associated clock at that height in London and see what it costs.

£150K / week including materials doesn't strike me as too bad to be honest.

dandarez

13,276 posts

283 months

Monday 14th August 2017
quotequote all
Jonesy23 said:
You try doing a major cosmetic and functional refurb and structural repair of a grade 1 listed UNESCO world heritage site and associated clock at that height in London and see what it costs.

£150K / week including materials doesn't strike me as too bad to be honest.
getmecoat

dandarez

13,276 posts

283 months

Monday 14th August 2017
quotequote all
Personally, I think they've dropped a clanger.

getmecoat

thebraketester

14,221 posts

138 months

Monday 14th August 2017
quotequote all
30million? ..... pull the other one....

Cold

15,236 posts

90 months

Monday 14th August 2017
quotequote all
I say, ding dong.

Yipper

5,964 posts

90 months

Monday 14th August 2017
quotequote all
We all know where it will end up... Cost 60 million and 6 years... The contractors will string it out and milk it to the max for a national icon.

Murph7355

37,684 posts

256 months

Tuesday 15th August 2017
quotequote all
Jonesy23 said:
You try doing a major cosmetic and functional refurb and structural repair of a grade 1 listed UNESCO world heritage site and associated clock at that height in London and see what it costs.

£150K / week including materials doesn't strike me as too bad to be honest.
This.

Every time I do some work/a project on even a simple, 520yr old house I want to line up Kirsty Allsop, Sarah Beanie, Phil Spencer, George Clarke, Kevin McCloud and any other TV celeb who has uttered how much stuff costs and bury them in a pit filled with concrete. Fortunately I wouldn't get listed building consent for that and the alternatives probably wouldn't have the same impact smile

Halmyre

11,185 posts

139 months

Tuesday 15th August 2017
quotequote all
Never fear, the full weight of Her Majesty's Press is on the case.

(from BBC web site)

"There is criticism of plans to stop Big Ben's chimes because of concerns about the hearing of workers involved in a restoration scheme.

The Daily Mail believes health and safety has succeeded in silencing the bells where the Luftwaffe failed.

The Sun says the project is "all bong wrong" and officials should have come up with a more imaginative solution to protect the workers.

The Daily Telegraph also asks why a compromise was not possible to keep the bell in action.
In its leader column, the paper says that the most famous emblem of the nation is being silenced at a crucial time as the UK negotiates the terms of its new identity.
It asks "if the ravens are also to be dispatched from the tower" a reference to the superstition that if the ravens leave the Tower of London the Crown - and Britain - will fall."

Pesty

42,655 posts

256 months

Tuesday 15th August 2017
quotequote all

sparks_E39

12,738 posts

213 months

Tuesday 15th August 2017
quotequote all
This will have such a negative impact on my life in east Dorset frown

But seriously though, the cost and estimated repair time don't surprise me.

juice

8,532 posts

282 months

Tuesday 15th August 2017
quotequote all
Can't they replace the bong with a recording of a cockerel instead for the next few years ?

Oakey

27,561 posts

216 months

Tuesday 15th August 2017
quotequote all
That's still only half the cost of what was spent not building that garden bridge

kowalski655

14,632 posts

143 months

Tuesday 15th August 2017
quotequote all
juice said:
Can't they replace the bong with a recording of a cockerel instead for the next few years ?
Or the Muslim call to prayer....get the Daily Mail readers to explode smile

thebraketester

14,221 posts

138 months

Tuesday 15th August 2017
quotequote all
I am rather surprised that they have not developed a system of speakers at the bottom of the tower to reproduce the sound of the bells.

Ridgemont

6,548 posts

131 months

Tuesday 15th August 2017
quotequote all
Jonesy23 said:
You try doing a major cosmetic and functional refurb and structural repair of a grade 1 listed UNESCO world heritage site and associated clock at that height in London and see what it costs.

£150K / week including materials doesn't strike me as too bad to be honest.
The costs and duration appear to be related to the fact they thought it would be a great idea to add a lift. Which will only go half way up. When they've done previous refutes they shut for periods of 6 weeks.

Megaflow

9,388 posts

225 months

Tuesday 15th August 2017
quotequote all
Anybody that thinks this refurbishment is a minor like of paint type deal, needs to see the size and scale of the temporary steel work that he's been constructed to enable the works.

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

152 months

Tuesday 15th August 2017
quotequote all
kowalski655 said:
juice said:
Can't they replace the bong with a recording of a cockerel instead for the next few years ?
Or the Muslim call to prayer....get the Daily Mail readers to explode smile
Tempting

You could probably power the whole south east on the fury it would produce!

The Mail's take about the Luftwaffe is my favourite - squealing over-reaction at its best

ApOrbital

9,959 posts

118 months

Tuesday 15th August 2017
quotequote all
They need


Rovinghawk

13,300 posts

158 months

Tuesday 15th August 2017
quotequote all
ApOrbital said:
They need

Rank stupidity.