Lightened Flywheel ???

Lightened Flywheel ???

Author
Discussion

S5TVR

Original Poster:

1,239 posts

233 months

Monday 1st December 2008
quotequote all
Has anyone fitted one such as the "Raceproved" unit and if so did they notice much of a difference in performance ?

Edited by S5TVR on Monday 1st December 21:56

ceejay

1,274 posts

254 months

Tuesday 2nd December 2008
quotequote all
Had one fitted to the race car last season (now for sale in the classifieds). Doesn't make a huge difference but every little helps. Engine seemed to rev more freely with it.

ceejay

900T-R

20,404 posts

257 months

Tuesday 2nd December 2008
quotequote all
Sheesh - and I thought the one I had for two days back in 2004 didn't have much of a flywheel to begin with! biggrin

tcant

308 posts

211 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
Racing Green have just fitted the lightened flywheel to my Tuscan. I pick it up on Saturday. Will post again once I've had chance to try it out!

trackcar

6,453 posts

226 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
the SP6 flywheel is surprisingly heavy as standard!

tuscan_al

4,107 posts

214 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
8 kg isnt it?

THe rg one is 6 kg and super light 4 kg?

I had a lightweight put into my 200sx and that was 8 kg as a super light, from the std 12kg one.

I dont think these cars are exactly sluggish in revving up anyway, and prefer not to loose engine braking.

trackcar

6,453 posts

226 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
lose engine braking? you'll gain engine braking because of less angular momentum of the lighter flywheel ..

Edited by trackcar on Wednesday 3rd December 14:02

Buffoon

879 posts

204 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
trackcar said:
lose engine braking? you'll gain engine braking because of less angular momentum of the lighter flywheel ..

Edited by trackcar on Wednesday 3rd December 14:02
confused

Hear what you are getting at, but when you change down a heavier flywheel will be more resitive to change.

A matter of horses for courses. On track you would not want to use the Clutch to much as a brake, but for a lazy plod on the motorway things are different

trackcar

6,453 posts

226 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
Buffoon said:
trackcar said:
lose engine braking? you'll gain engine braking because of less angular momentum of the lighter flywheel ..

Edited by trackcar on Wednesday 3rd December 14:02
confused

Hear what you are getting at, but when you change down a heavier flywheel will be more resitive to change.

A matter of horses for courses. On track you would not want to use the Clutch to much as a brake, but for a lazy plod on the motorway things are different
Ah .. you're one of those "asking for trouble" drivers who don't match revs to speed on downchanges? In that case you defo need a light flywheel which will spin up quickly and save from death by hedgerow smilehehe

Edited by trackcar on Wednesday 3rd December 16:06

willtvr

1,099 posts

197 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
trackcar said:
Buffoon said:
trackcar said:
lose engine braking? you'll gain engine braking because of less angular momentum of the lighter flywheel ..

Edited by trackcar on Wednesday 3rd December 14:02
confused

Hear what you are getting at, but when you change down a heavier flywheel will be more resitive to change.

A matter of horses for courses. On track you would not want to use the Clutch to much as a brake, but for a lazy plod on the motorway things are different
Ah .. you're one of those "asking for trouble" drivers who don't match revs to speed on downchanges? In that case you defo need a light flywheel which will spin up quickly and save from death by hedgerow smilehehe

Edited by trackcar on Wednesday 3rd December 16:06
Indeed, the apparently dying art of double de-clutching rolleyes

GreenV8S

30,186 posts

284 months

Wednesday 3rd December 2008
quotequote all
Buffoon said:
use the Clutch ... as a brake
eeknono You don't want to be doing that ever, in a powerful rwd car. Not on the track, not on public roads. Just don't.

Far Eastender

1,361 posts

218 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
I tried that a couple of years ago, did a perfect 180 and went back up the road the way I had come. Never tried to repeat it though.

Buffoon

879 posts

204 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
Yeah Yeah Yeah. Beat me up why don't you.

Not suggesting it is good practice, and there is a big difference between dumping the clutch with engine at tick over, and easing the clutch up with engine speed just below that of drivetrain. The latter (again not to be recommended) encourages the pops & bangs that keep us smiling

willtvr

1,099 posts

197 months

Thursday 4th December 2008
quotequote all
Buffoon said:
Yeah Yeah Yeah. Beat me up why don't you.

Not suggesting it is good practice, and there is a big difference between dumping the clutch with engine at tick over, and easing the clutch up with engine speed just below that of drivetrain. The latter (again not to be recommended) encourages the pops & bangs that keep us smiling
Always thought it was the engine on the overrun that caused the noises, not the clutch engagement? confused

Buffoon

879 posts

204 months

Friday 5th December 2008
quotequote all
willtvr said:
Buffoon said:
Yeah Yeah Yeah. Beat me up why don't you.

Not suggesting it is good practice, and there is a big difference between dumping the clutch with engine at tick over, and easing the clutch up with engine speed just below that of drivetrain. The latter (again not to be recommended) encourages the pops & bangs that keep us smiling
Always thought it was the engine on the overrun that caused the noises, not the clutch engagement? confused
irked

I give up.

This is effectively overrun' i.e. engine going faster than position of hoof on accelerator requires.

Anyway, for all you saintly drivers out there, I must come for a spin with you one day to see how to do it properly. Unless you are doubling the clutch you are darned clever. Apart from pulling away from a stand you fellahs don't need a clutch at all, which should dramtically reduce the number of failures.soapbox

ceejay

1,274 posts

254 months

Friday 5th December 2008
quotequote all
Heel and toe is really easy to learn in a TVR once you've set the pedals up properly. Matching revs on downshift is important in light RWD cars especially in this weather.

Any way back to the LW flywheel, did I mention I have a Raceproved one for sale?

ceejay

Buffoon

879 posts

204 months

Friday 5th December 2008
quotequote all
ceejay said:
Heel and toe is really easy to learn in a TVR
Heel and toe eh?scratchchin
Used to do that to the sound of 'Tiger Feet'whistle

I need to change my PH name to 'IKNOWHOWTODRIVEHONEST'hehe

My contribution to this thread has been like a Spike Milligan moment - digging a hole in the North Sea. Hard work and pointless.

I trust that when you guys drive home tonight, you will watch your tachos very closely. If when you lift the clutch, the revs waver up or down slightly, you will post on here next week to confess to Father Buffoon?yes

TVR_owner

3,349 posts

191 months

Friday 5th December 2008
quotequote all
Double declutching should not be confused with heeling and toeing - they are very different. One is appropriate for smooth safe downchanges, the other more approriate for non-syncro gearboxes. hehe

Whitey

2,508 posts

284 months

Friday 5th December 2008
quotequote all
TVR_owner said:
Double declutching should not be confused with heeling and toeing - they are very different. One is appropriate for smooth safe downchanges, the other more approriate for non-syncro gearboxes. hehe
Indeed, and also not to be confused with giving the throttle a blip as you change down (for the sound effects) which many on PH seem to think is heel n toe. Innit.

willtvr

1,099 posts

197 months

Friday 5th December 2008
quotequote all
TVR_owner said:
Double declutching should not be confused with heeling and toeing - they are very different. One is appropriate for smooth safe downchanges, the other more approriate for non-syncro gearboxes. hehe
Combining the two gives my age away I suppose John rolleyes