Matchbox Hawker Tempest

Matchbox Hawker Tempest

Author
Discussion

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,958 posts

265 months

Saturday 19th January 2013
quotequote all
I know we had a Tempest group build on here a while ago and at that time I built the Airfix/Heller Mk V.
However, I've always wanted to build a Mk II as well.

I picked up the ancient Matchbox kit at Scale Modeworld back in November and, now that I am through my massive Self Assessment workload, feel I have the time time to start on this.
It's a simple litle model (as many Matchbox kits were) and the idea is that it'll ease me back into building after an almost three month break.








Edited by Eric Mc on Sunday 20th January 10:06

dr_gn

16,146 posts

184 months

Saturday 19th January 2013
quotequote all
One of the few Matchbox 1:72 models I never built. IIRC you can build either the Sabre or Centaurus version hence the short fuselage?

I look forward to seeing progress.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,958 posts

265 months

Saturday 19th January 2013
quotequote all
The engine choice is precisely why I bought it.

I actually have the Special Hobby Mk II as well. The kits are light years apart detail wise but I want a quick build so went with the Matchbox.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,958 posts

265 months

Saturday 19th January 2013
quotequote all
A bit of basic internal detail to be added - the Matchbox kit has essentially none, apart from the seat.








Edited by Eric Mc on Sunday 20th January 10:08

dr_gn

16,146 posts

184 months

Saturday 19th January 2013
quotequote all
I'd have thought that visible interior detail will be minimal unless you're opening the emergency access door and canopy. Maybe an instrument panel, control column and seatblets?


Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,958 posts

265 months

Saturday 19th January 2013
quotequote all
That's as far as I intend to go - apart from the side struts. Having built the Heller/Airfix Tempest and the FROG Typhoon not that long ago I can vouch for the fact that there is little to see.

Red Firecracker

5,276 posts

227 months

Saturday 19th January 2013
quotequote all
Gawd, there's some funky plastic colours in that box. I rather enjoyed the group build, maybe we should do another sometime.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,958 posts

265 months

Saturday 19th January 2013
quotequote all
Tha was part of the Matchbox philosophy. By having "cool" coloured plastic they hoped to make the kits attractive to kids who would not be bothered to paint them.

dr_gn

16,146 posts

184 months

Sunday 20th January 2013
quotequote all
Matchbox also had a fairly severe limit on the size of sprues they could produce. This is why, on a lot of their larger aircraft (Halifax, Lancaster, B-17 etc.), the fuselages are in multiple pieces - the injection moulding machine wasn't big enough to do them whole.

Obviously that limitation didn't apply to the Tempest, but interesting they made an option of two such dissimilar looking aircraft into one kit.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,958 posts

265 months

Sunday 20th January 2013
quotequote all
They did some clever thinking at Matchbox - to try and appeal to both children and more "advanced" modellers.

72twink

963 posts

242 months

Sunday 20th January 2013
quotequote all
And they always seemed to take more care with their biplanes, things like the Siskin and P12E were delicate, accurate models quite removed from the more run of the mill stuff.

perdu

4,884 posts

199 months

Sunday 20th January 2013
quotequote all
Their Fury was a beauty too

I like that model Eric, went together quite well as I recall. I don't blame you keeping the 'excessive detailing' bug buried with that one.


Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,958 posts

265 months

Sunday 20th January 2013
quotequote all
My instrument panel is a reduced photocopy of a photo of the real thing. It will be good enough for what can be seen of it through the closed canopy.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,958 posts

265 months

Sunday 20th January 2013
quotequote all
Most of today's effort was spent in kitting out the interior and ensuring the whole lot would close up without any issues.

The front end of the engine compartment is blighted by an unsightly seam. The easiest way to deal with this was to hide the front end behind a blanking plate made up of a thin disk of plasticard cut to the right diameter and inserted into the space.

I'll post a picture when I get Thumbsnap to work. It wasn't playing ball yesterday and even though it worked this morning, it appears to have gone on strike again.


Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,958 posts

265 months

Sunday 20th January 2013
quotequote all
Working now.


dr_gn

16,146 posts

184 months

Sunday 20th January 2013
quotequote all
Crazy, but cool.

perdu

4,884 posts

199 months

Sunday 20th January 2013
quotequote all
The temptation to finish her as Matchbox intended/permitted just might overtake me Eric smile

I do like what you are doing here

Using a photograph reduced in size, perfect scale modelling technique. I like it, I'm using a similar technique to make the IPs for my latest, printing transfers from a set of photos


b

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,958 posts

265 months

Monday 21st January 2013
quotequote all
I bought this kit from a trader at Scale Modeworld and when I opened it I found a couple of problems.

Firstly, it had already been started, always a possibility with a second-hand (or perhaps third/fourth/fifth-hand in this case) kit. And the bits that had been glued together (the wings) had not been put together very well with lots of hardened cement in evidence on the exterior.

Secondly, one half of the Centaurus nose was missing - which was a bit of a bummer as the reason I bought the model was to do a Centaurus powered Tempest II. Luckily, a very kind modeller on the Unofficial Airfix Modellers' Forum solved my problem by sending me a spare Centaurus nose.

The glue damage has been rubbed down and polished out.

Matchbox were unusual in the early 70s in that they often depicted panels with recessed lines rather than the raised lines which were much more common then. However, the recessed lines were rather deep and crude by modern standards. Even the modern. Airfix lines have more finesse than the lines on the Tempest.

The previous "builder" had cut away the slot in the underside for the stand to be inserted. This has now been filled in with good old Humbrol model filler.

As ever, I'm not going to try and remedy these lines with filler or any other technique. I'll just live with them and do my best not to emphasise them in the painting process.

The kit decals are old and yellowed so I won’t be using them. I have the Special Hobby Tempest II in my stash as well and it offers three decal options. I will use one of these options on the Matchbox kit.

Red Firecracker

5,276 posts

227 months

Monday 21st January 2013
quotequote all
It's amazing the difference the alternative engine cowl makes to the whole feel of the model (beyond "it's bigger at the front", if you see what I mean).

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,958 posts

265 months

Monday 21st January 2013
quotequote all
It certainly looks a lot heftier.

There was also a Griffon engined variant which never went into production.

Tempest I



Tempest II




Tempest V



Edited by Eric Mc on Monday 21st January 18:42