Wingnut wings 1/32 sopwith camel

Wingnut wings 1/32 sopwith camel

Author
Discussion

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

8,784 posts

196 months

Sunday 3rd June 2018
quotequote all
The Facebook modelling group I am a member of are doing a group build of WW1 aircraft.
I’ve always wanted to try a wingnut wings kit as they have established a formidable reputation in their relatively short history.
The kit is expensive, but doesn’t disappoint. I’ll post some sprue shots if anyone is interested, but some of the injection moulding is on a par with resin parts. It really is that good.
Anyway here’s the box art.

So far I have assembled three parts of the instrument panel. Not bad for three hours work.
This is what I have achieved.

I’m really happy with how the wood effect turned out. I’m going to take my time with this one and see how good I can make it.

generationx

6,736 posts

105 months

Sunday 3rd June 2018
quotequote all
Wingnut Wings seem to have raised the game for aircraft kits. Watching with interest!

dr_gn

16,162 posts

184 months

Sunday 3rd June 2018
quotequote all
Looking good. I built the WnW SE.5a, it was the best kit I've ever bought.

Eric Mc

122,010 posts

265 months

Sunday 3rd June 2018
quotequote all
There were some beautiful examples of Wingnut kits on display at the Salisbury show yesterday.

Pity they don't do 1/72

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 4th June 2018
quotequote all
I'd really like to build one of these kits, mostly making tanks at the moment and just started an ME109, but I've seen a few Wingnuts kits featured in some of the model mags and they look very nice. Keep us updated with how you get on please.

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

8,784 posts

196 months

Tuesday 5th June 2018
quotequote all
A bit more progress over the last couple of days.
I finished the cockpit and the bodies of the machine guns.
My first real criticism of the kit is the PE on the belts. It’s actually quite thick and difficult to work with. I guess the eduard stuff has spoiled me somewhat.





I also started to paint the inside of the fuselage


It’s all going well although it’s not a build that I’m massively enjoying so far. I’m not sure why. I’m hoping that when I get the fuselage assembled that will change.

dr_gn

16,162 posts

184 months

Wednesday 6th June 2018
quotequote all
If you heat the photo-etch in a candle flame until it’s red hot, then let it air cool, it will anneal it, making it much easier to bend, and reduce the spring in it.

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

8,784 posts

196 months

Wednesday 6th June 2018
quotequote all
Didn’t think of that thanks.
Going back to my engineering apprenticeship many, many years ago: don’t you anneal brass by quenching in water? I thought it was only ferrous metals that needed to be left to cool. Mind you I can’t remember what I did yesterday let alone nearly thirty years ago...

The Dangerous Elk

4,642 posts

77 months

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

8,784 posts

196 months

Wednesday 6th June 2018
quotequote all
Thanks for the link. I’m not sure that would have helped though. Annealing would have been the best idea had I thought of it. It’s done now and looks fine.
Going through some of the parts I don’t think you will even be able to see most of the cockpit anyway. I guess it’s all about knowing the detail is there for yourself.


The Dangerous Elk

4,642 posts

77 months

Wednesday 6th June 2018
quotequote all

lufbramatt

5,345 posts

134 months

Wednesday 6th June 2018
quotequote all
They are beautiful kits. Would love to work for them. They are the kind of kits that appeal just for the level of detail and realism, despite the subject matter not really appealing to me.

Be aware that the finished models tend to be incredibly delicate. Have chatted to a few people at shows that have struggled to keep them together long enough to put on display due to the wings being so thin and location points quite fragile.

dr_gn

16,162 posts

184 months

Wednesday 6th June 2018
quotequote all
Not sure if you've thought about how to rig it yet, but I can reccommend eyelets and tubes from Bob's Buckles:

http://www.bobsbuckles.co.uk/how-.html



Used in conjunction with EzLine it's a pretty simple method.

Glue the eyelets into pre-drilled holes:



Then thread the EzLine through, using the brass tube as a tensioner:




robemcdonald

Original Poster:

8,784 posts

196 months

Wednesday 6th June 2018
quotequote all
I’ve now,got some ez line. So that is sorted. The instructions mention the possible use of turnbuckles etc. But say that isn’t right for the camel anyway see image below.

That said I’ve been looking at lots of pictures of camels and in reality some do have turnbuckles.
Here’s the one from the imperial war museum.

Whilst others don’t

I’m going to try and pop down to Hendon and have a look at theirs.
Ultimately I’ll probably just drill small holes and glue in the ez line.

dr_gn

16,162 posts

184 months

Thursday 7th June 2018
quotequote all
I think to be absolutely accurate you’d need flat photo-etch strip to represent the aerodynamic flat wires on the original. They are an absolute nightmare to fit and tension though:

http://www.radubstore.com/index.php?main_page=prod...

The eyelet/tube method I think is a good compromise - the tubes represent ‘some kind of fitting’ at the end of the wires, and are fairly unobtrusive. If you go with the cyano in a hole method, you do risk damaging your paint, and a tricky repair if something goes wrong. Not much choice in 1:72, but at 1:32 I chose the lower risk method. It’s also quite a therapeutic process...

One small issue with EzLine is that it adds no stiffness to the model. The SE.5a undercarriage was particularly flimsy, and I considered using stretched sprue wires to stiffen it.

Edited by dr_gn on Thursday 7th June 07:56

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

8,784 posts

196 months

Thursday 7th June 2018
quotequote all
You’re right of course. I just think those tiny eyelets and trying to thread the rigging through the tube would make my head explode.
Being that it’s my first bi-plane build I’m going with simpler (but potentially riskier) option. I don’t think it will detract from the overall model and anyone who sees it in my office certainly won’t notice.
There’s still time before I get to that stage though (this is the slowest build I think I’ve ever done) so I may change my mind and give it a go.

dr_gn

16,162 posts

184 months

Thursday 7th June 2018
quotequote all
robemcdonald said:
You’re right of course. I just think those tiny eyelets and trying to thread the rigging through the tube would make my head explode.
Being that it’s my first bi-plane build I’m going with simpler (but potentially riskier) option. I don’t think it will detract from the overall model and anyone who sees it in my office certainly won’t notice.
There’s still time before I get to that stage though (this is the slowest build I think I’ve ever done) so I may change my mind and give it a go.
Glueing them direct to the wings won't detract from the overall look at all, it's just I found cyano'ing eyelets into bare plastic less traumatic than EzLine into finished plastic. Sometimes the glue doesn't grab, and you're potentially left with a tiny hole full of rock hard cyano with no access to drill it out. Of course there are a few more stages to the process (threading the line, securing and trimming it), but at least you're 100% sure you can do it without any damage, and if you accidentally cut a line too short, you just start again with new line. Not possible with the direct method.

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

8,784 posts

196 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
Bit of an update.
Firstly I finished work on the fuselage (or so I thought at least) by assembling everything working on the seam before going through the normal process to add the decals.






Next I started work on the gun barrels. I drilled out the barrel ends to make it look a little better.



I thought I’d trial fit them to the fuselage.


Next onto the wings
First I assembled the top wing from its three parts. This is because there are two different centre sections for different aircraft. It would have been nice if they had just supplied two different wings given the price of the kit.
I applied primer and could not resist a trial fit.



Next up was painting the underside of the wings. I started with a 50:50 mic of white and deck tan. Which I then over sprayed with a thinned down coat of white (probably a mistake)

Next I used the conveniently sized Tamiya flexible masking tape to mask the rib tapes and the undersides of the inspection windows.

The a coat of deck tan.

The result was a bit too much contrast.

So I overspray did thinned coats of deck tan and white in parallel with the ribs to tone the effect down and blend everything together a bit. It looks a bit better than in the photos.


I applied a coat of clear to protect the result before the inevitable masking for the tops of the wings and left it to dry fully.
While that was going on I thought I’d make a start on the engine.

It’s only a few parts and before I thought about it it was more or less done.


As I go through the build one gripe I have about the kit is the complete lack of detailed colour call outs. If you simply followed the instructions a lot of the details wouldn’t get painted correctly. An example is the engine, which if you followed the painting instructions would just be steel colour with copper induction system.
It’s only because I was looking at a Clegert engine at the fleet air arm museum I thought about painting the push rods black and spark plugs white.
The main issue is for the different schemes they only supply a single side view. Consequently I painted the bottom of the fuselage the same green brown as the sides. It should have been the same doped material finish as the wings. So now I have to revisit that.
It’s not all bad news as I wasn’t entirely happy with the seam, so it’s a chance to improve that.
I’ll try and update more regular rather than just dump several days work in one go next time.

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

8,784 posts

196 months

Monday 18th June 2018
quotequote all
Just in case any of you thought I’d given up.

I have spent the last week painting, clear coating, applying decals, masking, removing masking, removing decals with the masking (despite them being clear coated) masking and painting the missing decals, applying wood effects with oil colours.
I have only the control horns left to paint and then it’s on to final assembly and the dreaded rigging.

Seriously though. The decals have been a real pain. In the instructions it categorically states not to use just water. If you do they won’t conform and definitely won’t stick.
I ended up using markfit and micro sol and they still weren’t great.
If I build another Wingnut wings kit I’m probably going to see if I can get some Cartograf ones or better still paint them. A couple on the camel are actually painted.


dr_gn

16,162 posts

184 months

Monday 18th June 2018
quotequote all
confused If it says don't use just water for the decals, then what does it say you have to use in addition? Pretty sure it didn't say that in the SE.5a instructions. Must admit I got some Pheon decals for mine becasue I didn't like any of the kit schemes.

What paint did you use on the cowling - or is it foil? It looks realistic.