The **BOXING** thread (Vol 4)
Discussion
fridaypassion said:
Pugaris said:
Usyk is a better boxer. Also has a great chin
Could be a few quid to be made on this one!I struggle to see anything special. Fury boxes like a smaller man than he is. Usyk, to me has a style bigger than he is.
I hope we see a Fury / Usyk fight with both in good health.
trickywoo said:
fridaypassion said:
Pugaris said:
Usyk is a better boxer. Also has a great chin
Could be a few quid to be made on this one!I struggle to see anything special. Fury boxes like a smaller man than he is. Usyk, to me has a style bigger than he is.
I hope we see a Fury / Usyk fight with both in good health.
Unreal said:
trickywoo said:
fridaypassion said:
Pugaris said:
Usyk is a better boxer. Also has a great chin
Could be a few quid to be made on this one!I struggle to see anything special. Fury boxes like a smaller man than he is. Usyk, to me has a style bigger than he is.
I hope we see a Fury / Usyk fight with both in good health.
Unreal said:
That's why you're a back seat observer bud. Usyk is one of the very best boxers on the planet with an astonishing amateur and pro record. That you can't see anything special is a refection on your knowledge of the sport and not you personally.
He’s got zero power in his left hand for a start and was rattled late on by AJ who surely nobody is claiming as any kind of quality fighter.trickywoo said:
I'm very much a back seat observer but kept hearing how good a boxer Usyk is so decided to watch some more fights.
I struggle to see anything special. Fury boxes like a smaller man than he is. Usyk, to me has a style bigger than he is.
I hope we see a Fury / Usyk fight with both in good health.
Wow!....I don't really know where to start pal....a generational talent who mastered the amateur code winning an Olympic gold to boot then became arguably the greatest cruiserweight ever in arguably the toughest, deepest cruiserweight era before moving up to heavyweight and seizing all of Joshua's belts, beating him in the rematch (in arguably Joshua's best performance).... All the while beating a long list of absolute killers for their cruiserweight and heavyweight belts on away soil every single time...mate, he'd belong at or near the very top of the pile in ANY eraI struggle to see anything special. Fury boxes like a smaller man than he is. Usyk, to me has a style bigger than he is.
I hope we see a Fury / Usyk fight with both in good health.
tuscaneer said:
Wow!....I don't really know where to start pal....a generational talent who mastered the amateur code winning an Olympic gold to boot then became arguably the greatest cruiserweight ever in arguably the toughest, deepest cruiserweight era before moving up to heavyweight and seizing all of Joshua's belts, beating him in the rematch (in arguably Joshua's best performance).... All the while beating a long list of absolute killers for their cruiserweight and heavyweight belts on away soil every single time...mate, he'd belong at or near the very top of the pile in ANY era
Genuine question, I’m not looking for an argument, how many cruiserweights have stepped up and dominated heavyweight?trickywoo said:
He’s got zero power in his left hand for a start and was rattled late on by AJ who surely nobody is claiming as any kind of quality fighter.
AJ is a two-time heavyweight champion of the world. Anybody who claims he isn't a kind of quality fighter is smoking crack. Power isn't everything, Usyk is a brilliant technical boxer with probably the best stamina in the game. He has elite footwork, he adjusts to his opponent in the ring in ways almost nobody has ever been capable of, he has a strong chin and even stronger will. I've been watching boxing intensively for 30 years and Usyk is one of the most talented fighters I've ever seen and I would say the best P4P fighter of his generation.
Fury is the best HW of his generation - it's an incredible fight.
Also, 'zero power' is wrong.
Pugaris said:
trickywoo said:
He’s got zero power in his left hand for a start and was rattled late on by AJ who surely nobody is claiming as any kind of quality fighter.
AJ is a two-time heavyweight champion of the world. Anybody who claims he isn't a kind of quality fighter is smoking crack. Power isn't everything, Usyk is a brilliant technical boxer with probably the best stamina in the game. He has elite footwork, he adjusts to his opponent in the ring in ways almost nobody has ever been capable of, he has a strong chin and even stronger will. I've been watching boxing intensively for 30 years and Usyk is one of the most talented fighters I've ever seen and I would say the best P4P fighter of his generation.
Fury is the best HW of his generation - it's an incredible fight.
Also, 'zero power' is wrong.
tuscaneer said:
trickywoo said:
Genuine question, I’m not looking for an argument, how many cruiserweights have stepped up and dominated heavyweight?
Very very few .. the difference in size is pretty massive ... But that question is not the same as saying you don't see anything special in him...biggbn said:
I've yet to see the same aura of invincibility at heavy. He looked briefly fragllile v AJ and it was his wil and skill that kept him in that fight after two fraught rounds. Bear in mind, AJ was made for him, relatively immobile, easy to hit, struggles against smaller men with fast hands. AJ may be an elite fighter at heavyweight; I have never thought he was, but he was the heavyweight Usyk would have prayed to fight. He is however a very special fighter, I have no doubt about that
I tend to feel Joshua is massively underrated whereas fury is massively overrated... Maybe not massively but you get my drift ... Fury employs a lot of smoke and mirrors.... His heavyweight "aura" has been built on that abortion of a fight against wlad (no need for me to go over old ground here but we all know why he ran for the hills rather than honour the rematch clause) then 3 fights against wilder... Utter st boxer and one trick pony... Sure, a neat trick when he catches them but fk me, the skill levels of a D grade fighter with a record to match......Fury looked good of course, but then his dance partner allowed him to look that good ...
tuscaneer said:
Very very few .. the difference in size is pretty massive ... But that question is not the same as saying you don't see anything special in him...
Also a relatively new division, lots of 70s and 80s HWs who could have been a CW to start. Last time we saw a CW as good as Usyk, he did alright at HW...
tuscaneer said:
biggbn said:
I've yet to see the same aura of invincibility at heavy. He looked briefly fragllile v AJ and it was his wil and skill that kept him in that fight after two fraught rounds. Bear in mind, AJ was made for him, relatively immobile, easy to hit, struggles against smaller men with fast hands. AJ may be an elite fighter at heavyweight; I have never thought he was, but he was the heavyweight Usyk would have prayed to fight. He is however a very special fighter, I have no doubt about that
I tend to feel Joshua is massively underrated whereas fury is massively overrated... Maybe not massively but you get my drift ... Fury employs a lot of smoke and mirrors.... His heavyweight "aura" has been built on that abortion of a fight against wlad (no need for me to go over old ground here but we all know why he ran for the hills rather than honour the rematch clause) then 3 fights against wilder... Utter st boxer and one trick pony... Sure, a neat trick when he catches them but fk me, the skill levels of a D grade fighter with a record to match......Fury looked good of course, but then his dance partner allowed him to look that good ...
Edit, I've said this before, the AJ that lost to Usyk the second time gives ANY heavyweight a good run. His best ever performance
Edited by biggbn on Friday 17th March 19:04
biggbn said:
I really don't see that. Great movement, great feet, fast hands, brilliant, yes, brilliant boxing brain and a fantastic sense of spatial awareness. He can fight on the outside and the inside and has beaten every man he faced. AJ was a very good heavy, perhaps still is, but he was an 'a to b' fighter, did the basics very well but couldn't deviate fron that route once he'd set on down it. I still make him top four in the world but I'd take both Joyce and 'one trick' Wilder to beat him. I think we have agreed to disagree before but I feel exactly opposite to you, I think AJ has been very overated whilst Fury has even overlooked from a boxing point of view.
Edit, I've said this before, the AJ that lost to Usyk the second time gives ANY heavyweight a good run. His best ever performance
Agree with all of this completely (but also everything Tusc said about Wilder.)Edit, I've said this before, the AJ that lost to Usyk the second time gives ANY heavyweight a good run. His best ever performance
Edited by biggbn on Friday 17th March 19:04
If you dropped the current crop of HWs into any era, Usyk and Fury would be competitive with the very top guys, AJ and Wilder wouldn't be, though they'd still be fun top 10 additions.
AJ is an improved version of Bruno. Better gas tank and better at dealing with getting hurt but still has those two things as weaknesses to his game. Similar to Bruno in that he's a very good fundamentals boxer with heavy hands but AJ's bigger and his mid-range game is an improvement of Frank's.
Fury is a special fighter, no doubt. He's a very intelligent fighter and that shows in his decisions out of the ring as well, as soon as he a) realised the way to beat Wilder was to keep him on the backfoot based on his 12th round in the first fight and the Ortiz rematch after and b) that he doesn't quite have the speed and movement he once did he knew exactly which coach to bring in to train him. He also knocked Dillian Whyte out with the first uppercut he threw all night, perfectly baited and executed.
Usyk is special, too. Even moreso imo. His ability to adjust to his opponent is a level of ring intelligence I think is superior to even Fury's and his lateral movement is superb to watch. Some of the subtle things he did to distract AJ in their first fight were brilliant and his fight against Gassiev is the most perfectly executed 12 rounds of boxing I've seen since probably Calzaghe Vs Lacey.
This is a fight on a level of skill and ability we haven't seen in the HW division for 30 years imo. It's Lewis Vs Holyfield or Holyfield Vs Bowe type levels.
Gassing Station | Sports | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff