E90 M sport advice

E90 M sport advice

Author
Discussion

Simoted

Original Poster:

134 posts

194 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
Looking for some advice. After years of running Nissan lease cars I’ve decided to try a BMW. I’m looking to spend upto £10k. I’ve seen quite a few 320d coupe (and petrol versions) between 2009 and 2013 in this price range. Ideally I want something with no more than 60k miles on. Most of my driving is around town,I do maybe 8-9k miles per year. Would I be better off going for the petrol or diesel and what’s the common faults on these?. Do they both have timing chains?.
Thanks

Smuler

2,286 posts

139 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
Simoted said:
Looking for some advice. After years of running Nissan lease cars I’ve decided to try a BMW. I’m looking to spend upto £10k. I’ve seen quite a few 320d coupe (and petrol versions) between 2009 and 2013 in this price range. Ideally I want something with no more than 60k miles on. Most of my driving is around town,I do maybe 8-9k miles per year. Would I be better off going for the petrol or diesel and what’s the common faults on these?. Do they both have timing chains?.
Thanks
For 10,000£ and doing low miles, why not a straight six petrol. I only had a very kwik look and example is illustrative only, but even approved used have an option at that price.

https://usedcars.bmw.co.uk/vehicle/201901083736487...

These are better engines inmho

d_a_n1979

8,312 posts

72 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
IMO at that budget and mileage, as already said, stick to petrol and a straight 6

Yup; timing chains but very few issues, unlike the 4 pot petrols and diesels

Where are you located, how willing are you to travel for the right car, any particular colour and spec you want, auto or manual, saloon, coupe or touring (estate)? Are you ideally after BMW dealer car or happy with private sales also?

bmwmike

6,939 posts

108 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
Six pot petrol means N53 engine and arguably it's worst years 2007/8-2009. Buying from a dealer should assure all latest bits fitted if not when you pick it up but when you have to take it back. Push for 2yr warranty.

Agree six pot petrol too btw I love the n53 in my car but no blind to its weaknesses.

Simoted

Original Poster:

134 posts

194 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
d_a_n1979 said:
IMO at that budget and mileage, as already said, stick to petrol and a straight 6

Yup; timing chains but very few issues, unlike the 4 pot petrols and diesels

Where are you located, how willing are you to travel for the right car, any particular colour and spec you want, auto or manual, saloon, coupe or touring (estate)? Are you ideally after BMW dealer car or happy with private sales also?
I’m near Sunderland. Ideally would like one within 50 miles or so but could travel further. A manual coupe. They look nice with the 19inch wheels but obviously that’s not a deal breaker. I’d probably prefer to buy from a garage, I am willing to look at private cars if the right one turns up.

Simoted

Original Poster:

134 posts

194 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
bmwmike said:
Six pot petrol means N53 engine and arguably it's worst years 2007/8-2009. Buying from a dealer should assure all latest bits fitted if not when you pick it up but when you have to take it back. Push for 2yr warranty.

Agree six pot petrol too btw I love the n53 in my car but no blind to its weaknesses.
Is the 2L petrol a straight six in these?. Also are the engines better from 2010-13?

Simoted

Original Poster:

134 posts

194 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
I’ve found a local private sale for a coupe on a 2010 with 50k miles on. It is the diesel but it’s only done 7k miles in the last 4 years, is that something to worry about?.

Edited by Simoted on Monday 21st January 16:05

helix402

7,855 posts

182 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
2l petrol is the horrible and unreliable N43 4 cylinder.

Simoted

Original Poster:

134 posts

194 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
My aim is to get a nice looking car with not too high running costs. I don’t like the sound of an unreliable engine. I do like the sound of a straight six though!. I could live with a 2L diesel (I’ve had Qashqai 1.5 diesels for the last 6 years!).

E-bmw

9,192 posts

152 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
Simoted said:
My aim is to get a nice looking car with not too high running costs. I don’t like the sound of an unreliable engine. I do like the sound of a straight six though!. I could live with a 2L diesel (I’ve had Qashqai 1.5 diesels for the last 6 years!).
While you may well be able to "live with a 2l diesel" at that mileage /year it is absolutely NOT the car to buy, it WILL cost you more to run & you will also lose more on it.

Simoted

Original Poster:

134 posts

194 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
E-bmw said:
Simoted said:
My aim is to get a nice looking car with not too high running costs. I don’t like the sound of an unreliable engine. I do like the sound of a straight six though!. I could live with a 2L diesel (I’ve had Qashqai 1.5 diesels for the last 6 years!).
While you may well be able to "live with a 2l diesel" at that mileage /year it is absolutely NOT the car to buy, it WILL cost you more to run & you will also lose more on it.
Why will it cost more to run? What would you say I should go for?.

Simoted

Original Poster:

134 posts

194 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
E-bmw said:
Simoted said:
My aim is to get a nice looking car with not too high running costs. I don’t like the sound of an unreliable engine. I do like the sound of a straight six though!. I could live with a 2L diesel (I’ve had Qashqai 1.5 diesels for the last 6 years!).
While you may well be able to "live with a 2l diesel" at that mileage /year it is absolutely NOT the car to buy, it WILL cost you more to run & you will also lose more on it.
Why will it cost more to run? What would you say I should go for?.

Smuler

2,286 posts

139 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
I remember when E9X generation was “current” a petrol v diesel rule of thumb was :-
Diesels cost more to buy , more to service , fuel costs more ;thus to make economic sense you have to do a whole lot of miles to claw back that “investment” in much better mpg.

I’m not sure whether that rule of thumb is as pertinent with the cars at a lower price point , but it might be if you can get a like for like petrol for cheaper and maintain it cheaper, because at 8k p.a. you’ll have less chance of benefiting from lower mpg. savings.
Depreciation won’t likely be a saving grace , as older diesels are declining in popularity.

The “fly in the ointment “ is that the most like for like the 320i was never much thought of. Hence I suggested going 6 cylinder. A quick look on Autotrader , however, struggled to find many manuals!

Personally , for low mileage, if necessary I’d go auto , petrol , 6 cylinder to have a much nicer better driving experience.

Or I’d see if another brand offered me a decent petrol alternative in budget.

Simoted

Original Poster:

134 posts

194 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
Thanks for the replies.

Which bMWs have the 6 cylinder petrol engines?. Is there a 3 series coupe with a 2.5 petrol around the 2010-2013?.

I have also looked at some 1 series couples that have been nice but similar prices to the 3 series, they were also diesel though. I mainly was looking towards the diesel due to thinking they would be more reliable when older, 8-9 year old car. I take it the petrol is as reliable?.

I’m not keen on having a 3L due to high road tax and probably poor fuel economy. I quickly got fed up of a Focus ST as it was never out of the petrol station!.

Smuler

2,286 posts

139 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
Simoted said:
Thanks for the replies.

Which bMWs have the 6 cylinder petrol engines?. Is there a 3 series coupe with a 2.5 petrol around the 2010-2013?.

I have also looked at some 1 series couples that have been nice but similar prices to the 3 series, they were also diesel though. I mainly was looking towards the diesel due to thinking they would be more reliable when older, 8-9 year old car. I take it the petrol is as reliable?.

I’m not keen on having a 3L due to high road tax and probably poor fuel economy. I quickly got fed up of a Focus ST as it was never out of the petrol station!.
There were a 325i, 330i straight six n/a petrol cars in that period. April 2010 was the facelift , aka LCI. E92 went out of production (sale) around 2013.
But reading your last post, quoted here, if you're really not keen on 3.0l then if you're sticking with a E92 (it's better looking than a 1 series, surely wink diesel may well be your best bet. I don't have the knowledge to list the know faults, but I'd say get one with perfect service history that hasn't a record of problems and you're as safe as you can be with a 9 year old approx. car.


Simoted

Original Poster:

134 posts

194 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
You’ve got me looking at 325s now!, not as bad on tax as I thought. What are they like on fuel (real life figures, not from the spec sheets!). Also is there much to worry about if buying say a 2011 with 50k miles on with FBMWSH?.

Smuler

2,286 posts

139 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
From everything I’ve read and in the opinion of my BMW specialist a n/a straight six is the sweet spot of reliability. Mike , above, stated the N53 specifically was more problematic in its earlier years , so maybe another vote for 2010 -2013.
I’ve owned a previous generation(E46) has 325 and for my kind of hard driving , often short distances I can remember only being a few pence per mile higher on costs than my 20d. It’s not a brilliant comparison as 20d is in a SUV so a lot heavier and AWD. But genuinely made me question value of 20d diesels if , in my case, you’re going to drive them hard to squeeze out the performance. Over my mileage , I can still save but it is around 20k miles p.a.
Fuelly is a website which gets mentioned here a lot , maybe that can give you a broader spread of mpg?
Maybe also get a few prices for servicing both type of cars.

helix402

7,855 posts

182 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
330 won’t do worse mpg than a 325. Or get a 6 cyl diesel.

bmwmike

6,939 posts

108 months

Monday 21st January 2019
quotequote all
325i is a 3.0 for the n53 years 2008-2013 anyway

Agree with helix there is nothing in it running costs

When they run right they run great but can empty your wallet pretty quickly too. But, google for mondial warranty job done less than 50 per month for a e91/2/3 I believe.


Mr Tidy

22,250 posts

127 months

Tuesday 22nd January 2019
quotequote all
For 8/9K miles a year I would go petrol straight 6. My BMW Indy (who is ex-Sytner) recommended at least 6 cylinders, and preferably petrol!

So I bought an E91 325i in February 2018 that has been great - despite having 132K miles on it when I bought it, although it did have full BMW Service History.

I wanted an early one with the N52 engine to avoid the injector, HPFP and coking up issues that come with the N53 engine.

Just find a good one!