F90 M5 Competition

F90 M5 Competition

Author
Discussion

Burwood

18,709 posts

246 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
likesachange said:
On track do you notice a lot of difference when switching between the 2 and 4 WD?
I'm not a good enough driver for RWD and +600hp! Kept it in 4WD albeit did switch TC off (part off then fully off) just to see what would happen. Part off allowed some slip albeit caught by the car after a moment or two. Even fully off it seemed to handle ok with the 4WD shuffling power around etc. Apart from the one Summer day both the other days were wet with many many cars sliding off track; the M5 stayed on track the whole time which is testament to it's many safety systems I guess + it was able to put all the power down all of the time.

TX.
'I turned off TC is see what would happen' lol. That had the start of an ominous post smile

Zanderman

Original Poster:

1,090 posts

212 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
Good man, glad someone is using them as intended!

Have you done track days in anything else? Interested in your thoughts on a comparison. I did a track day recently in aC2S 911 and did one on the M5 last year and my limited driving ability was much better suited to the M5.

What did the rear pads cost you? Not bad wear on the tyres though! What do tyres do you have?

Terminator X said:
Mine has been on track x3 so far. I try to avoid Summer as the tracks are full of Caterhams who don't like being overtaken on the straights wink

Rear pads went quite quick; afaik the stability control / traction control trims speed etc using the rear brakes. BMW chap was surprised they had gone so quickly redface

14k miles overall and have had to replace rear tyres; fronts probably only have a few k left in them.

Apart from that all ok + she goes well for a Big Beast.

As an aside a few of my mates have RS3's and their tyres were destroyed when we did one single Summer day (their tyres seemed to go like marshmallow, really soft and squidgy) vs mine that didn't seem effected at all.



TX.

Edited by Terminator X on Tuesday 7th July 11:30

Terminator X

15,031 posts

204 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
Burwood said:
'I turned off TC is see what would happen' lol. That had the start of an ominous post smile
Ha ha wink the track I was at had lots of grass run off areas though (vs say Castle Coombe which has concrete barriers everywhere!) so not too bad even if you slid off. A chap did go off in his Mac though, still ripped off the undertray and front spoiler etc yikes

TX.

Terminator X

15,031 posts

204 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
Zanderman said:
Good man, glad someone is using them as intended!

Have you done track days in anything else? Interested in your thoughts on a comparison. I did a track day recently in aC2S 911 and did one on the M5 last year and my limited driving ability was much better suited to the M5.

What did the rear pads cost you? Not bad wear on the tyres though! What do tyres do you have?

Terminator X said:
Mine has been on track x3 so far. I try to avoid Summer as the tracks are full of Caterhams who don't like being overtaken on the straights wink

Rear pads went quite quick; afaik the stability control / traction control trims speed etc using the rear brakes. BMW chap was surprised they had gone so quickly redface

14k miles overall and have had to replace rear tyres; fronts probably only have a few k left in them.

Apart from that all ok + she goes well for a Big Beast.

As an aside a few of my mates have RS3's and their tyres were destroyed when we did one single Summer day (their tyres seemed to go like marshmallow, really soft and squidgy) vs mine that didn't seem effected at all.



TX.

Edited by Terminator X on Tuesday 7th July 11:30
Yes my old RS3 and RS4 and now the M5C. Clearly I have built up to this sort of pace as the cars got quicker each time I got a new one wink RS3 felt fast on the road less so on the track, not at all understeery as some on here would have you believe. RS4 felt fast in both places, handled well for a heavy estate car. M5C is far too fast for the road (part throttle only 99% of the time) but "comes alive" on track. Big and heavy etc but handles really well + it looks after you too. Both the Winter track days were sodden yet the car still felt planted and was able to put all the power down. The good thing about the track is that you can feed the power in on the corners and feel the car move around etc yet because it is so wide even minor twitches can be handled ok. In the corners you do feel the weight albeit on the straights it just flies! Overall very capable I'd say + really enjoyable which is my main reason for doing them.

Rear pads cost £170 from BMW albeit free labour as they made various cock ups booking the car in. Tyres were P Zero on the car as new albeit I have changed the rears to MPS4s and will do the same for the fronts.

TX.

likesachange

2,630 posts

194 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
I'm not a good enough driver for RWD and +600hp! Kept it in 4WD albeit did switch TC off (part off then fully off) just to see what would happen. Part off allowed some slip albeit caught by the car after a moment or two. Even fully off it seemed to handle ok with the 4WD shuffling power around etc. Apart from the one Summer day both the other days were wet with many many cars sliding off track; the M5 stayed on track the whole time which is testament to it's many safety systems I guess + it was able to put all the power down all of the time.

TX.
Thanks, so on a wet track day you could apply all the power in all gears and get full traction??

Zanderman

Original Poster:

1,090 posts

212 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
I really must overcome my fear and try it out.

Thanks for the info!

Terminator X said:
Yes my old RS3 and RS4 and now the M5C. Clearly I have built up to this sort of pace as the cars got quicker each time I got a new one wink RS3 felt fast on the road less so on the track, not at all understeery as some on here would have you believe. RS4 felt fast in both places, handled well for a heavy estate car. M5C is far too fast for the road (part throttle only 99% of the time) but "comes alive" on track. Big and heavy etc but handles really well + it looks after you too. Both the Winter track days were sodden yet the car still felt planted and was able to put all the power down. The good thing about the track is that you can feed the power in on the corners and feel the car move around etc yet because it is so wide even minor twitches can be handled ok. In the corners you do feel the weight albeit on the straights it just flies! Overall very capable I'd say + really enjoyable which is my main reason for doing them.

Rear pads cost £170 from BMW albeit free labour as they made various cock ups booking the car in. Tyres were P Zero on the car as new albeit I have changed the rears to MPS4s and will do the same for the fronts.

TX.

Terminator X

15,031 posts

204 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
likesachange said:
Terminator X said:
I'm not a good enough driver for RWD and +600hp! Kept it in 4WD albeit did switch TC off (part off then fully off) just to see what would happen. Part off allowed some slip albeit caught by the car after a moment or two. Even fully off it seemed to handle ok with the 4WD shuffling power around etc. Apart from the one Summer day both the other days were wet with many many cars sliding off track; the M5 stayed on track the whole time which is testament to it's many safety systems I guess + it was able to put all the power down all of the time.

TX.
Thanks, so on a wet track day you could apply all the power in all gears and get full traction??
Yes subject to the laws of physics. On a straight no problem, on a bend you just had to measure the throttle as the back end wanted to come out despite 4WD. Very easy to control though even for a numpty like me.

On the dry day it just went like stink everywhere incl the bends.

TX.

Zanderman

Original Poster:

1,090 posts

212 months

Wednesday 22nd July 2020
quotequote all
One thing I forgot to ask was about track day insurance. Did you get any? The idea of stacking the car worries me a bit but from what I have seen track day insurance can be really expensive and not all that comprehensive for more expensive cars.

Cheers!

Terminator X said:
Yes my old RS3 and RS4 and now the M5C. Clearly I have built up to this sort of pace as the cars got quicker each time I got a new one wink RS3 felt fast on the road less so on the track, not at all understeery as some on here would have you believe. RS4 felt fast in both places, handled well for a heavy estate car. M5C is far too fast for the road (part throttle only 99% of the time) but "comes alive" on track. Big and heavy etc but handles really well + it looks after you too. Both the Winter track days were sodden yet the car still felt planted and was able to put all the power down. The good thing about the track is that you can feed the power in on the corners and feel the car move around etc yet because it is so wide even minor twitches can be handled ok. In the corners you do feel the weight albeit on the straights it just flies! Overall very capable I'd say + really enjoyable which is my main reason for doing them.

Rear pads cost £170 from BMW albeit free labour as they made various cock ups booking the car in. Tyres were P Zero on the car as new albeit I have changed the rears to MPS4s and will do the same for the fronts.

TX.

Max Maxasson

410 posts

183 months

Wednesday 22nd July 2020
quotequote all
likesachange said:
Thanks, so on a wet track day you could apply all the power in all gears and get full traction??
You can get all 4 wheels spinning in the wet if you try hard enough...its not too scary.
The M5 is RWD all the time up until the rear wheels start to slip and only then is the power sent to the front wheels.
When you can feel the power move to the front wheels (subtly through the steering wheel) you know you are pushing pretty hard.

c10vet

65 posts

42 months

Tuesday 3rd November 2020
quotequote all
Hi all - I am considering a used (1-2 yrs old) F90 M5, but was recently put off when someone told me there have been engine problems. I haven’t seen mentioned in any of the reviews. Any thoughts??

Thank you all!

garystoybox

776 posts

117 months

Tuesday 3rd November 2020
quotequote all
c10vet said:
Hi all - I am considering a used (1-2 yrs old) F90 M5, but was recently put off when someone told me there have been engine problems. I haven’t seen mentioned in any of the reviews. Any thoughts??

Thank you all!
News to me and I’ve had three M cars from new with a variant of this 4.4 engine. The level of after market tuning they can tolerate demonstrate what a strong unit they are. Too many people with opinions on things they know nothing about. That said, my cars have all been factory ordered new and run in correctly, but I doubt even a thrashed from cold former demo what throw up any problems (make sure you buy a one owner car?)
Best of luck with your search... it’s the best daily runaround I’ve ever had.

c10vet

65 posts

42 months

Tuesday 3rd November 2020
quotequote all
garystoybox said:
c10vet said:
Hi all - I am considering a used (1-2 yrs old) F90 M5, but was recently put off when someone told me there have been engine problems. I haven’t seen mentioned in any of the reviews. Any thoughts??

Thank you all!
News to me and I’ve had three M cars from new with a variant of this 4.4 engine. The level of after market tuning they can tolerate demonstrate what a strong unit they are. Too many people with opinions on things they know nothing about. That said, my cars have all been factory ordered new and run in correctly, but I doubt even a thrashed from cold former demo what throw up any problems (make sure you buy a one owner car?)
Best of luck with your search... it’s the best daily runaround I’ve ever had.
Many thanks Gary!! Good to hear...

Terminator X

15,031 posts

204 months

Tuesday 3rd November 2020
quotequote all
c10vet said:
Hi all - I am considering a used (1-2 yrs old) F90 M5, but was recently put off when someone told me there have been engine problems. I haven’t seen mentioned in any of the reviews. Any thoughts??

Thank you all!
Tuned they can suffer from bent pistons (high torque cars), standard I haven't heard of any issues either. Mine is on 18k miles no issues.

TX.

c10vet

65 posts

42 months

Tuesday 3rd November 2020
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
Tuned they can suffer from bent pistons (high torque cars), standard I haven't heard of any issues either. Mine is on 18k miles no issues.

TX.
Thanks Terminator X

JMBMWM5

2,283 posts

198 months

Tuesday 3rd November 2020
quotequote all
I am on my 5th M5, the latest being the 2020 LCI comp, never had a problem with the cars.
My Latest .

Burwood

18,709 posts

246 months

Tuesday 3rd November 2020
quotequote all
very nice,jon smile

Zanderman

Original Poster:

1,090 posts

212 months

Tuesday 3rd November 2020
quotequote all
Sadly ended up getting rid of mine. Had barely driven it since March and was costing/depreciating way too much to just sit there. Still one of the very best cars I have owned!

aponting389

741 posts

178 months

Tuesday 3rd November 2020
quotequote all
I got rid of mine too! Actually had a lot of issues. Maybe it was a lemon. Main faults were faulty injectors and a drivetrain malfunction that kept cutting power when you drove it hard. Very annoying and dealer could never “replicate it” because you had to drive it pretty hard to get it to happen.

I’ve heard horror stories of remapped cars destroying bottom ends. They are not bullet proof. 2 guys I talked to about getting mine remapped and they both advised me against it instead of relieving me of £800

HoHoHo

14,987 posts

250 months

Tuesday 3rd November 2020
quotequote all
Mine was recently in the garage with a coolant leak.

After two weeks and having had the gearbox off and all manner of other items removed it appeared to be from under the turbos, a pipe of some description had cracked and the repair took three weeks in total.

My car is 18 months old with 15k on the clock. I’ve owned it from new and it’s been looked after with no modifications.

I’m not bothered about this repair or the amount of work, don’t forget it’s as mechanical machine and threat go wrong. However I would add the caveat that I would not run one of these without a good warranty - my recent repair had 10 full days of labour and two full pages of parts to fix the leak.

c10vet

65 posts

42 months

Tuesday 3rd November 2020
quotequote all
HoHoHo said:
Mine was recently in the garage with a coolant leak.

After two weeks and having had the gearbox off and all manner of other items removed it appeared to be from under the turbos, a pipe of some description had cracked and the repair took three weeks in total.

My car is 18 months old with 15k on the clock. I’ve owned it from new and it’s been looked after with no modifications.

I’m not bothered about this repair or the amount of work, don’t forget it’s as mechanical machine and threat go wrong. However I would add the caveat that I would not run one of these without a good warranty - my recent repair had 10 full days of labour and two full pages of parts to fix the leak.
Ouch - sorry to hear that, but thank you for sharing. Hope all is ok now and for the future.

My view is that pretty much any (complicated) car these days has a fair chance of suffering a drama or two (my wife’s ex-demo Range Rover Sport has been SHOCKING - 10 visits back to dealer in 2yrs and now arguing with dealer over who pays for a replacement tailgate that opens intermittently when driving and got damaged as a result. Do not buy a RR! We have a lemon but I have heard so many problems with them, including from the dealer Service Mgr himself on the QT! 😆