RE: Subaru Impreza WRX STI 330S | Spotted

RE: Subaru Impreza WRX STI 330S | Spotted

Thursday 30th March 2023

Subaru Impreza WRX STI 330S | Spotted

The hatchback Impreza isn't fondly remembered; some were definitely better than others, though...


Even 15 years later, it’s hard not to feel a bit sorry for Subaru when it comes to the Impreza hatch debacle. It was always going to be hard to follow the saloon, replacing it a near enough impossible task. If only the five-door could have followed a few years later, when the all-wheel drive hyper hatch had really taken off - think RS3, A45 AMG, the good Golf R and so on - then it might have provided some intriguing opposition. And saved some face.

But then you remember how the Impreza hatch was received, and stop feeling too sorry for Subaru. The problem wasn’t simply replacing a four-door car with a five-door one, it was that Subaru made an Impreza that wasn’t very good. Both WRX and STI felt very ordinary, suddenly as bland to drive as they were to look. Normally an Impreza’s plain appearance could be excused by an invigorating drive; the introduction of the hatch brought dull dynamics to go along with the looks. And the interior was still cheap. The verdicts were less than glowing: ‘It leaves this benchmark Impreza struggling to answer the excitement and tech advances on offer in the Evo X, and the quality, looks and desirability of the premium-brand offerings at the same price.’ Ouch.

The 330S was the model to give the Impreza hatch a shot in the arm. Launched in 2009, it benefitted from more power (330hp and 347lb ft would make it competitive against today’s crop), a set of smart 18-inch alloys, four (count ‘em!) big exhausts out back and a nicer interior, with Recaro seats and better sat-nav.

It didn’t sound a transformative upgrade, but the 330S was much more favourably received than the STI on which it was based, suggesting that car really wasn’t far from being very good. One reviewer tried it back to back with a 360hp Mitsubishi and described it as ‘more enjoyable to drive than the Evo’, one that offered better value for money as well. Another praised it as a ‘snarling performance car that would give the like of the Porsche 911 a run for its money on a twisting B-road’. Top Gear said: ‘It's even more intense and more extreme than the standard STI, which is pretty much as fast a point-to-point car as you can think of’. Sure, there was plenty of lag, the steering still wasn’t brilliant and the legacy of the old Imprezas (no pun intended) cast a long shadow, but the 330S proved there was a good Impreza in the hatch.

Furthermore, all these years later a turbo flat four that needs stoking can be characterful rather than frustrating, a firm ride is probably nothing by 2023 standards, and a droney exhaust can be swapped out. Lots of fuel will have to go in, yes - which Impreza doesn’t need it? We’re all familiar with the special Subarus from Japan and less familiar with the UK ones, especially those from later in the Impreza’s life. By all accounts, the 330S was a good’n.

This Pure White car seems especially nice, garaged from new by just the one owner. It’s been well enjoyed - 80k miles will attest to that - but comes with a fully stamped service book and what looks like flawless condition. There isn’t a mark on it to be seen anywhere. Even the pointiest of Recaro bolsters are intact, amazingly. Not only does the 330S appear fastidiously well cared for, it remains the best looking of the hatch bunch. Maybe not a tough ask, but still.

The asking price is £20k, a good deal more than an equivalent STI on account of its rarity and better reputation. It’s almost Spec C money, in fact. Still less than a Focus RS, though, the car that totally reset expectations of what a front-wheel drive hatch was capable of. Subaru really couldn’t catch a break with the five-door Impreza. But the 330S proved that some magic remained, and it’s nothing if not a likeable curio as a result.


SPECIFICATION | SUBARU IMPREZA 330S

Engine: 2,457cc, flat-four turbo
Transmission: 6-speed manual, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 330@5,400rpm
Torque (lb ft): 347@3,400rpm
MPG: 23.7
CO2: 281g/km
Year registered: 2009
Recorded mileage: 79,000
Price new: £30,345
Yours for: £20,490

See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

mersontheperson

Original Poster:

701 posts

165 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
The hatchback grew on me a few years after release, and now I think it’s my favourite shape. But never liked them in white for some reason, in that colour they just seem unpainted to my eyes.

fantheman80

1,432 posts

49 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
I think these looks fantastic in the flesh. Proper chunky wider arch, almost ( I repeat almost) integra vibes for me. You stick it next to the golf r or AMG35 etc, i know which ones id take the keys for....(although id give it back before the service interval and the fuel tank ran out)

cerb4.5lee

30,467 posts

180 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
As Matt mentioned...credit has to go to the owner for keeping those Recaro side bolsters in such great condition for sure. These have always been a bit of a guilty pleasure for me, because I remember the absolute kicking that they got in the motoring press at the time, and I've always felt a bit sorry for them because of it.

Jon_S_Rally

3,398 posts

88 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
I hated the hatch when it was launched, but it's definitely frown on me over the years. I think they look pretty good in STI form. Not pretty, but definitely purposeful, especially with the right wheel/ride height combination. I'd still take a saloon overall, but I think the hatch has aged pretty well.

This looks a really well cared-for example, but it might struggle to sell compared to more desirable models I guess.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,317 posts

150 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
If it's not blue with gold wheels, I'm out.

drgoatboy

1,619 posts

207 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
I just bought a WRX STI that's pretending to be a 330s.

Not sure why they were so slatted at the time really....

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...

Bright Halo

2,959 posts

235 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
I really like these, it was ahead of its time but we just didn’t know it.
I’ll keep an eye on them as it may suit if I get a job closer to home. (As in walking distance biggrin)

nismo48

3,678 posts

207 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
Not a bad old hatch...
Bright and clean and ready to use thumbup

nismo48

3,678 posts

207 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
Not a bad old hatch...
Bright and clean and ready to use thumbup

1974foggy

676 posts

144 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
Petty, but i always didnt like those rear lights, very aftermarket and cheap looking.

I remember them being a massive flop at the dealership i worked for, and the diesel boxer engine versions lasting about 20 miles before self destructing.

MattsCar

935 posts

105 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
It is not "almost Spec C money".

It IS spec C money. And a nice one at that.

https://www.torque-gt.co.uk/impreza-sti-spec-c-070...


popeyewhite

19,782 posts

120 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
Oooh that's nice (above)

Gecko1978

9,675 posts

157 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
I had a 2007 hawk eye when these came along it just felt meh I kept the 07 till 2014 by which time Honda Ford VW Audi and BMW had all moved the game along and subaru just felt old.

They have made some great looking concepts and then done there damdest to produce really bland cars with poor interiors. People now want a lot of cash for Hugh tax high service cost car that's just not as good as other options. I loved my WRX but since then it's all left me cold.

Snubs

1,171 posts

139 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
It was the asymmetric rear light on these that I think look awful. I see that isn't the case on the Spec C linked to above. Was that a factory or aftermarket change?

S600BSB

4,553 posts

106 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
Still don't really like the hatch and wouldn't spend £20k on one with that mileage.

LotusOmega375D

7,599 posts

153 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
Most memorable thing about the 330S is the twin test EVO published with my 22B. The previous owner actually provided the car, but I had bought it off him by the time the issue was published. I still have a framed copy of this photo hanging on my living room wall.


British Beef

2,209 posts

165 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
S600BSB said:
Still don't really like the hatch and wouldn't spend £20k on one with that mileage.
I was imagining a price much closer to £10k for this car with 80k miles on it.

Another example of crazy money for a pretty ordinary car. Nuts!


framerateuk

2,730 posts

184 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
My dad had one of these (after having an original Turbo, UK300 and a WR1).

It felt slower than the others (especially after the WR1 which was a monster), but also felt less flat in the corners.

The main problem though, was after 3 years it was going though more oil than petrol - a problem that a lot of them had it seems (And it wasn't sorted with that generation either).

kpelise

15 posts

163 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
It's done 87k kms, not 80k miles as the article states, so around 55k miles in reality. Come on PH, not a hard thing to get right?

S600BSB

4,553 posts

106 months

Thursday 30th March 2023
quotequote all
Does this have the 'chocolate teapot' engine?