Incoming… what do you have? (Vol. 3)

Incoming… what do you have? (Vol. 3)

Author
Discussion

chemistry

2,151 posts

109 months

Friday 26th January 2018
quotequote all
I find the dial too busy, think the case/movement is a bit too deep (more Milgauss than Explorer/Datejust) and don’t particularly feel the ‘Bloodhound’ connection is much of a plus.

It’s a fine watch for those that like the look/design though. Each to their own.

Yanto

543 posts

208 months

Friday 26th January 2018
quotequote all
Picked up recently. Birth year Speedmaster. 70s cool and Minty mint.




Nick M

3,624 posts

223 months

Saturday 27th January 2018
quotequote all
Nick M said:


Been after a GMT watch for a while (was looking at a Steinhart above, and a Longines Conquest GMT), and ummed and ahhed over this one as it was over budget. But decided to bite the bullet and just grabbed it while the pre-order discount was still available.

Bit of a risk as I'm just having to hope it wears nicely on my wrist, but fingers crossed...
Arse, delayed a bit longer (hopefully only to next month) frown

But they're throwing in a free rubber strap as an apology smile

CardShark

4,194 posts

179 months

Saturday 27th January 2018
quotequote all
Nick M said:
Arse, delayed a bit longer (hopefully only to next month) frown

But they're throwing in a free rubber strap as an apology smile
Wrist shot when it arrives, please smile

Years back I used to own one of their Hydrocarbon models, it wasn't the largest of cases (40mm, I think) however it wrapped well around the wrist due to the lug shape. Hopefully yours fits well.

Voldemort

6,144 posts

278 months

Saturday 27th January 2018
quotequote all
CardShark said:
A lovely watch ruined, imho, by the ridiculous shape of the hour hand. But each to their own and all that, hope you enjoy it for many years.

T6 vanman

3,066 posts

99 months

Saturday 27th January 2018
quotequote all
Voldemort said:
A lovely watch ruined, imho, by the ridiculous shape of the hour hand. But each to their own and all that, hope you enjoy it for many years.
It's CardShark ..... He'll enjoy it for many days before it's superseded by another shiny thing laugh

CardShark

4,194 posts

179 months

Saturday 27th January 2018
quotequote all
It's a keeper, I tell thee biggrin

I've no intention of purchasing anything else this year, honest. In fact, some will be going - two have been sold in the last few days.


Edited by CardShark on Saturday 27th January 16:20

T6 vanman

3,066 posts

99 months

Saturday 27th January 2018
quotequote all
CardShark said:
It's a keeper, I tell thee biggrin

I've no intention of purchasing anything else this year, honest. In fact, some will be going - two have been sold in the last few days.
Space for one more then surely biggrin



andy97

4,703 posts

222 months

Saturday 27th January 2018
quotequote all
Yanto said:
Picked up recently. Birth year Speedmaster. 70s cool and Minty mint.



Mk3?

Yanto

543 posts

208 months

Saturday 27th January 2018
quotequote all
andy97 said:
Yanto said:
Picked up recently. Birth year Speedmaster. 70s cool and Minty mint.



Mk3?
Yep

imperium

390 posts

84 months

Saturday 27th January 2018
quotequote all
Voldemort said:
CardShark said:
A lovely watch ruined, imho, by the ridiculous shape of the hour hand. But each to their own and all that, hope you enjoy it for many years.
I used to have an issue with the hour hand but it’s grown on me. So much so these are on my radar, going to try one soon.

Mr_C

2,441 posts

229 months

Saturday 27th January 2018
quotequote all
CardShark said:
My new Tudor Heritage Black Bay 36.

I happen to think it's a bit of alright.





I could have sworn I cleaned the crystal properly. Bugger.

Edited by CardShark on Friday 26th January 14:55
Love these! Did you look at the 41 as well? The 36 seems a more cohesive looking watch to me.

andy tims

5,578 posts

246 months

Sunday 28th January 2018
quotequote all
Really pleased to be getting this one back in the next few days.







The person I sold it to in November 15 kindly offered me first refusal as he decided to sell & I had no hesitation at all.

It's a nice low serial # watch (# 28) that I bought directly from Damasko when they re-commenced making watches in 2009, after a hiatus of several years.

Edited by andy tims on Sunday 28th January 08:05

CardShark

4,194 posts

179 months

Sunday 28th January 2018
quotequote all
Mr_C said:
Love these! Did you look at the 41 as well? The 36 seems a more cohesive looking watch to me.
I hadn't tried the 41mm version however after trying both the blue and red BBs in the past I didn't think I needed to. They've got different bezels, granted, however I don't think that it would make any difference to how they wear and I find them too slab-like in profile and a little too tall on the wrist. They look great in 'photos however I agree that the 36 is much more cohesive with everything in proportion. Some PH Director types may struggle with the concept of a 36mm gents watch however I think it's the pick of the range and a bit of a sleeper at that, even without an in-house movement. There will be those that say it's just Tudor's Explorer and to an extent they'd be right (same size, steel case/bracelet, same white-on-black no-date dial), it's a different case shape though and the snowflake handset plus the different lumed hour plots give it a slightly more casual and robust look about it. 150mtr WR vs 100mtr as well, if that really makes any difference.

Perhaps slightly ironically, despite the "Heritage" name tag, Tudor never made a watch of this size and type in the past. It's riding on the coat tales of the very successful BB range, and doing a great job of it at that.

Re the comments on the handset, I completely understand why they're not for some. They're there for historical reference, the original Tudor Submariners used snowflake handsets and it's this feature that has been carried over to the Black Bay and Pelagos ranges. They actually make for incredibly clear reading, even at night there's no mistaking where the hour hand is even when the minute hand shadows it and there's an unambiguous distinction between the two unlike, for example, a stick handset on a Rolex.

andy tims said:
Really pleased to be getting this one back in the next few days.

I'm seriously considering putting my Si version on the block, I don't wear it anywhere near as often as my DA36 and DA44 and my Sinn EZM13 suits my chrono needs. It would be missed if it were to go.

Doofus

25,806 posts

173 months

Sunday 28th January 2018
quotequote all
Paid the balance on this pre-order this morning. Expected in three or four weeks.


Squadrone Rosso

2,752 posts

147 months

Sunday 28th January 2018
quotequote all
Doofus said:
Paid the balance on this pre-order this morning. Expected in three or four weeks.

That’s lovely. I just googled the brand. Impressive. Reasonable too.

Doofus

25,806 posts

173 months

Sunday 28th January 2018
quotequote all
Squadrone Rosso said:
That’s lovely. I just googled the brand. Impressive. Reasonable too.
It'll make three in my collection. I rate them highly. Some will suggest influences from other brands, but don't all watches do that? They are really nicely made, with decent movements and, as you say, a very good price.

Teebs

4,364 posts

215 months

Monday 29th January 2018
quotequote all
|https://thumbsnap.com/mTEbq05U[/url]

Collected yesterday.

ZesPak

24,427 posts

196 months

Monday 29th January 2018
quotequote all
Squadrone Rosso said:
Doofus said:
Paid the balance on this pre-order this morning. Expected in three or four weeks.

That’s lovely. I just googled the brand. Impressive. Reasonable too.
Just did the same and send them an inquiry.

They look nice and hardly break the bank, very tempted to pre order something as well!

Doofus

25,806 posts

173 months

Monday 29th January 2018
quotequote all
ZesPak said:
Just did the same and send them an inquiry.

They look nice and hardly break the bank, very tempted to pre order something as well!
These are my other two. Apologies for rough-and-ready photo taken on my tablet.