Wrist Check 2017

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Vvroom

1,170 posts

190 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all
Friday


sidicks

25,218 posts

221 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all

Justayellowbadge

37,057 posts

242 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all
Doofus said:
I take it the person in white is your carer?
Distinctive, is it not?

Only tried it on, but it would have a unique ability to render the rest of my collection restrained and elegant in comparison.

Doofus

25,814 posts

173 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all
Justayellowbadge said:
Distinctive, is it not?

Only tried it on, but it would have a unique ability to render the rest of my collection restrained and elegant in comparison.
Yes.... 'Distinctive'. That's the word I was searching for...

Wills2

22,819 posts

175 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all
Doofus said:
Justayellowbadge said:
I take it the person in white is your carer?
hehe

AMG Merc

11,954 posts

253 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all
Is that Ozzie Osbourne's arm there ? laugh

Spice_Weasel

2,286 posts

253 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all
Isn't this Sly Stallone's watch brand? Looks rather Expendables-inspired.

Justayellowbadge

37,057 posts

242 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all
Spice_Weasel said:
Isn't this Sly Stallone's watch brand? Looks rather Expendables-inspired.
It is, and it is.

130R

6,810 posts

206 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all
Incredibly that silver one appears to be the understated model as well ..


ZesPak

24,428 posts

196 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all
Still.. Incorrect roman numerals.

So

26,280 posts

222 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all
ZesPak said:
AMG Merc said:
I don't get it either scratchchin
Romans count like this:

  1. I
  2. II
  3. III
  4. IV
One of the rules of thumb is not to repeat a character more than 3 times. So 8 is VIII and 9 is IX. Same goes on every level. Thirty is XXX fourty is XL (L is 50).
So, in short, IIII is no number. It doesn't exist in Roman numerals.
Might as well have a dial that says: I, II, 3, 4, 5

/pedant

Edited by ZesPak on Monday 16th October 13:55
Here's the Romans using four consecutive "1"s in the Vatican.




I am sure had I looked about long enough I would have found 4 represented as 1111 but I was late for tea with Papa Francesco.

Squadrone Rosso

2,752 posts

147 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all
I bought my 2017 Autavia in May. Very pleased but the leather strap was too short for my manly wrists.

So, bought the genuine “beads of rice” bracelet from my AD & got it this morning.

Very pleased smile






Raddors

497 posts

148 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all
AlleyCat said:
That is lovely Chronostop and one that I think is overlooked a bit!. Currently thinking about getting a Chronostop Driver.
Do it, love mine.


Justayellowbadge

37,057 posts

242 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all
I disapprove, but my 11 year old loves this.


ZesPak

24,428 posts

196 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all
So said:
Here's the Romans using four consecutive "1"s in the Vatican.




I am sure had I looked about long enough I would have found 4 represented as 1111 but I was late for tea with Papa Francesco.
I'm sure there's plenty of statues with spelling mistakes biggrin.

Just as in watches, styling biggrin

Or someone put 7 there instead of 9 and corrected it afterwards hehe

Dempsey1971

383 posts

170 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all
ZesPak said:
So said:
Here's the Romans using four consecutive "1"s in the Vatican.




I am sure had I looked about long enough I would have found 4 represented as 1111 but I was late for tea with Papa Francesco.
I'm sure there's plenty of statues with spelling mistakes biggrin.

Just as in watches, styling biggrin

Or someone put 7 there instead of 9 and corrected it afterwards hehe
Does it actually date from Roman times?

sad61t

1,100 posts

210 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all
Early Roman numerals were a tally system, always additive, and IIII and VIIII were the normal usage.
Later, (perhaps to reduce fraud, or just to improve legibility) a subtractive notation was introduced and using IV and IX became the more common form for 4 and 9 respectively.

Edited by sad61t on Friday 20th October 14:37

So

26,280 posts

222 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all
sad61t said:
Early Roman numerals were a tally system, always additive, and IIII and VIIII were the normal usage.
Later, (perhaps to reduce fraud, or just to improve legibility) a subtractive notation was introduced and using IV and IX became the more common form for 4 and 9 respectively.

Edited by sad61t on Friday 20th October 14:37
That's what Papa Francesco was just saying. He says that the 4 on Cartier Tank Francaise is perfectly fine.

He was wearing an iced out Rolex day-date incidentally.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all
Raddors said:
Do it, love mine.

You've got your hand on upside down.

CardShark

4,194 posts

179 months

Friday 20th October 2017
quotequote all


Have a great weekend, all smile
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED