Wrist Check 2017
Discussion
ZesPak said:
AMG Merc said:
I don't get it either
Romans count like this:- I
- II
- III
- IV
So, in short, IIII is no number. It doesn't exist in Roman numerals.
Might as well have a dial that says: I, II, 3, 4, 5
/pedant
Edited by ZesPak on Monday 16th October 13:55
I am sure had I looked about long enough I would have found 4 represented as 1111 but I was late for tea with Papa Francesco.
So said:
Here's the Romans using four consecutive "1"s in the Vatican.
I am sure had I looked about long enough I would have found 4 represented as 1111 but I was late for tea with Papa Francesco.
I'm sure there's plenty of statues with spelling mistakes .I am sure had I looked about long enough I would have found 4 represented as 1111 but I was late for tea with Papa Francesco.
Just as in watches, styling
Or someone put 7 there instead of 9 and corrected it afterwards
ZesPak said:
So said:
Here's the Romans using four consecutive "1"s in the Vatican.
I am sure had I looked about long enough I would have found 4 represented as 1111 but I was late for tea with Papa Francesco.
I'm sure there's plenty of statues with spelling mistakes .I am sure had I looked about long enough I would have found 4 represented as 1111 but I was late for tea with Papa Francesco.
Just as in watches, styling
Or someone put 7 there instead of 9 and corrected it afterwards
Early Roman numerals were a tally system, always additive, and IIII and VIIII were the normal usage.
Later, (perhaps to reduce fraud, or just to improve legibility) a subtractive notation was introduced and using IV and IX became the more common form for 4 and 9 respectively.
Later, (perhaps to reduce fraud, or just to improve legibility) a subtractive notation was introduced and using IV and IX became the more common form for 4 and 9 respectively.
Edited by sad61t on Friday 20th October 14:37
sad61t said:
Early Roman numerals were a tally system, always additive, and IIII and VIIII were the normal usage.
Later, (perhaps to reduce fraud, or just to improve legibility) a subtractive notation was introduced and using IV and IX became the more common form for 4 and 9 respectively.
That's what Papa Francesco was just saying. He says that the 4 on Cartier Tank Francaise is perfectly fine.Later, (perhaps to reduce fraud, or just to improve legibility) a subtractive notation was introduced and using IV and IX became the more common form for 4 and 9 respectively.
Edited by sad61t on Friday 20th October 14:37
He was wearing an iced out Rolex day-date incidentally.
Gassing Station | Watches | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff