Which Rolex to replace my Submariner

Which Rolex to replace my Submariner

Author
Discussion

TeeRev

Original Poster:

1,637 posts

150 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
Long story but I’ve never posted on this part of pistonheads so be gentle with me.

My parents asked me what I wanted for my 18th birthday and I said a Rolex, which they duly gave me, only problem was it was the wrong one. They were happy for me to change the Oyster to a Submariner though, which as I was obsessed with diving was what I really wanted.

The supplying jeweller was a family friend and very kindly gave me full value part ex against a new Submariner and I paid him £2.00 per week for 17 weeks to make up the difference between £38.00 and £72.00, (£66.00 + £6.00 for the better strap), this was in 1968.

I wore that watch every day of my life until it was ripped from my wrist when I was mugged in Barcelona two years ago, it was virtually part of my body and I was absolutely devastated but it was insured for 5k and this was paid out by my insurers without question.

I always said if I ever lost it I would replace it with another but just have not felt ready to do so. When the new anniversary Sea Dweller came out I thought that was the way to go and nearly paid 11.5k for one a few weeks ago but bottled at the last moment.

Yesterday we were in Brufords, Eastbourne buying my wife the new Longines Equestrian which she had finally decided was what she wanted after several months of looking at everything from Cartier to Rolex, price wasn’t the issue it was just the look, she’s even worse than me at decisions!

Anyway, I noticed a pre-owned Yacht-Master in the window and tried it on, it looked and felt good but wasn’t quite sure about the blue dial so the salesman got out a new one with the dark rhodium dial and chromalight display which was a little more understated but really looked right to me.

I think I have made my decision but what do the experts on here think?

The dealer will also put me on the list for a Sea Dweller so if I change my mind about it I can have one of those in a year or two.


ellroy

7,000 posts

224 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
Can you not try and get a like for like year replacement for the sub from someone like watchfinder?

I think that's what i'd be inclined to do.

That being said the new Yacht is a lovely thing.

Jinba Ittai

562 posts

90 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
Out of the two i prefer the blue dial. I've never hankered after a Yacht master until I recently saw the Steel and Rose Gold with the Chocolate dial and I was absolutely blown away. The Yacht Master is definitely a watch that is better in the flesh than in photos.


audidoody

8,595 posts

255 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
For £5k I'd be tempted to replace the stolen watch with a 14060M ND Sub

TeeRev

Original Poster:

1,637 posts

150 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
My 1968 Sub was a model 5513 and I have looked at a similar 1969 one in a dealer, it looked like my watch but it wasn't "my" watch if you can understand that. I don't know how you can be emotionally involved with a watch but I was, it meant a hell of a lot to me and I would gladly disembowel the scrotes who mugged me but that wouldn't get it back so I have decided to move on which means having something different.

Even though I do still dive occasionally, (once a year in warm and clear water) a dive watch is not really needed today as a computer does all the calculations for you, I actually go sailing more often these days.

I suppose I was looking at the Anniversary Sea Dweller and justifying it as a sort of upgrade but it is actually quite large and in your face while the Yacht-Master is a bit smaller, quite understated and very smart looking, (I don't bother with evening/dress watches) so I can wear it all the time.

I think I'm going Yacht-Master but which colour is the thing, I can't use price to choose as there is only £750.00 between so a final decision will be made tomorrow when I go back for another look.

gizlaroc

17,251 posts

223 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
On looks alone the one on the right looks nicer to me.

I have never been a massive fan of the Yachmaster, although always really liked them, but the Everose one is stunning imho..


drainbrain

5,637 posts

110 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
If the stolen one's been reported and is on Rolex's lists then you just might get lucky some time in the future.

If I was you (which I'm not) I'd have gone for that '69 5513 or something similar though I doubt if you'd get a mint one with b&p etc for £5k.

But if money's really no object why not treat yourself to a red, double red, or comex?

gregs656

10,816 posts

180 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
Go with your gut.

I think the dark rhodium dial looks great. The blue dial might work better with a different bezel colour but as it sits doesn't look quite right to my eye.

I also really like the blue hands.

I'm not normally big on Rolex but that is very nice indeed.

Edited by gregs656 on Wednesday 15th November 22:02

hilly10

7,076 posts

227 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
gizlaroc said:
On looks alone the one on the right looks nicer to me.

I have never been a massive fan of the Yachmaster, although always really liked them, but the Everose one is stunning imho..

No way am I a Yacht Master fan, but that is a stunning watch, I could even drop my Sub for one of those. I bet they are pricey

Mr_C

2,441 posts

228 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
The rhodium dial is stunning.

TeeRev

Original Poster:

1,637 posts

150 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
drainbrain said:
If the stolen one's been reported and is on Rolex's lists then you just might get lucky some time in the future.

If I was you (which I'm not) I'd have gone for that '69 5513 or something similar though I doubt if you'd get a mint one with b&p etc for £5k.

But if money's really no object why not treat yourself to a red, double red, or comex?
It's been on the Rolex list for nearly two years but no luck yet, I'm not sure they even knew what they had got as they were a proper couple of low lifes.

The 5513 I looked at was 6k, it was fine but as I said earlier it wasn't "my" watch.

I was budgeting on spending the 5k insurance and adding 5k to it so unfortunately a Comex is just a little out of my reach, one of my diving mates worked for them and had one, he sold it many years ago though, for 12k I think.

I do have one watch which is absolutely priceless to me though.



My son who was one of the UK's top windsurfers and Animal were one of his sponsors, they gave him this watch for winning the Indoor Windsurfing Jump Contest at the London Boat Show in 2004. I worked for the UKWA as the organiser and when he made the winning jump it was the proudest moment of my life.

Unfortunately he died in June 2004 when he fell from a jetski, this watch is one of the few things he left me and my Submariner means nothing in comparison.

ellroy

7,000 posts

224 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
That’s priceless.

Chris Stott

13,179 posts

196 months

Friday 17th November 2017
quotequote all
gizlaroc said:
On looks alone the one on the right looks nicer to me.

I have never been a massive fan of the Yachmaster, although always really liked them, but the Everose one is stunning imho..

BIL bought his wife an everose yachtmaster and an everose Daytona for himself on that strap... they are both stunning.

TeeRev

Original Poster:

1,637 posts

150 months

Friday 17th November 2017
quotequote all
Picked it up yesterday afternoon, very happy!!!


Armitage.Shanks

2,249 posts

84 months

Friday 17th November 2017
quotequote all
I think you made a good choice. I've a Rolex Sub I bought in 1993 and worn it nearly every day in all situations. It's got a 'patina' that no watch could ever replace and I'll never sell.

If I lost/stolen then a '93 Sub wouldn't be the same as it would have someone elses wear and tear so I'd have to go new/near new.

I'd be in the queue to disembowl the scroates who nicked yours.

Mr_C

2,441 posts

228 months

Friday 17th November 2017
quotequote all
That’s beautiful. Excellent choice.

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

195 months

Friday 17th November 2017
quotequote all
Excellent choice, suitably different from your original with enough styling hints to carry the continuation. Nice that it ties in with your hobby too.

Sy1441

1,113 posts

159 months

Friday 17th November 2017
quotequote all
Great choice, I think Rolex nailed it with that one, was never a Yachtmaster before that one.

HannsG

3,031 posts

133 months

Friday 17th November 2017
quotequote all
gizlaroc said:
On looks alone the one on the right looks nicer to me.

I have never been a massive fan of the Yachmaster, although always really liked them, but the Everose one is stunning imho..

Stunning

Buster73

5,042 posts

152 months

Monday 20th November 2017
quotequote all
TeeRev said:
Picked it up yesterday afternoon, very happy!!!

My first Rolex was a ND Sub bought whilst on a skiing trip 18 years ago in January .

I'd hankered after an original faced Yachtmaster for quite a while and was seconds away from buying one whilst on holiday and ended up not buying one.

A few years later I tried the blue faced one on , and while my wife liked it , I just felt it didn't look right and walked away again.

Fast forward to last year , saw the Rhodium dial one , tried it on and pulled the trigger , it's a beautiful piece .

However, first on my wrist is still my Sub , I wear it everyday for work , riding my bike or washing the car ,anything. Daft as it sounds it's just seems not right when I'm not wearing it.