HMS Queen Elizabeth

Author
Discussion

normalbloke

7,450 posts

219 months

Wednesday 7th October 2020
quotequote all
Sloane’s A109 G-MAOL is parked on deck of the POW. What gives? FR shows it coming out of Buck Palace gardens straight to the carrier deck.

Edited by normalbloke on Wednesday 7th October 14:43

ecsrobin

17,114 posts

165 months

Wednesday 7th October 2020
quotequote all
It’s been spotted previously flying under an RAF callsign for the royal flight so possibly on lease.

Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

279 months

Wednesday 7th October 2020
quotequote all
Steve vRS said:
Video of the jets taking off.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CHxB7fPiadg

How fast are they going when they leave the ski jump? On camera, they look slow but obviously that is an optical illusion.
Probably slow because they are taking off with a massive airbrake deployed.

Boom78

1,215 posts

48 months

Wednesday 7th October 2020
quotequote all
Cold said:
The Strike Group has assembled.

The video is mighty impressive in a dark and foreboding type of way, nice to see us (and one or two nation ships) putting out that carrier group, most advanced ever put to sea!

Edit to say there’s going to be other stuff lurking under the depths, ours (U.K./USA) and possibly the odd Russian hehe

Edited by Boom78 on Wednesday 7th October 18:27

Captain Obvious

5,713 posts

206 months

Wednesday 7th October 2020
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
Steve vRS said:
Video of the jets taking off.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CHxB7fPiadg

How fast are they going when they leave the ski jump? On camera, they look slow but obviously that is an optical illusion.
Probably slow because they are taking off with a massive airbrake deployed.
Are they able to take off with a full tank of fuel and full set of weapons?

Condi

17,188 posts

171 months

Wednesday 7th October 2020
quotequote all
Captain Obvious said:
Are they able to take off with a full tank of fuel and full set of weapons?
One would hope so...

They have a smaller fuel load than the other variants as the fan takes up the space of 1 tank.

normalbloke

7,450 posts

219 months

Thursday 8th October 2020
quotequote all
normalbloke said:
Sloane’s A109 G-MAOL is parked on deck of the POW. What gives? FR shows it coming out of Buck Palace gardens straight to the carrier deck.

Edited by normalbloke on Wednesday 7th October 14:43
It was the Ukrainian president and his wife apparently.

Cold

15,244 posts

90 months

Thursday 8th October 2020
quotequote all
normalbloke said:
normalbloke said:
Sloane’s A109 G-MAOL is parked on deck of the POW. What gives? FR shows it coming out of Buck Palace gardens straight to the carrier deck.

Edited by normalbloke on Wednesday 7th October 14:43
It was the Ukrainian president and his wife apparently.
They spent some time with Wills and Kate before whizzing over to HMS PWLS to sign a Memorandum of Intent. But they flew in a Puma.



(Zelensky, is the short bloke, front/left)

normalbloke

7,450 posts

219 months

Thursday 8th October 2020
quotequote all
Who got to ‘slum’ it in the 109 then?

Cold

15,244 posts

90 months

Thursday 8th October 2020
quotequote all
Dunno. confused
Defence Secretary Ben Wallace was there and so was Ukrainian Defence Minister Andriy Taran, so maybe one/either of them? Perhaps Mrs Zelensky grabbed the posh flight while the blokes went all Top Gun?

Mind you, a Chinook also visited the ship a bit later so who knows? laugh

RizzoTheRat

25,155 posts

192 months

Thursday 8th October 2020
quotequote all
In semi related news, the Russians have released the first official footage of a Zircon launch

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/36945/russia...

Mach 8 sounds like it might give the fleet air defenders a headache, although I assume it's a bit slower as it descends to the target.

Cold

15,244 posts

90 months

Wednesday 14th October 2020
quotequote all
Back home tomorrow. Due in 11:15.

Talksteer

4,858 posts

233 months

Wednesday 14th October 2020
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
Teddy Lop said:
the real brainbreaker is that we bought the hovver jet - the thing we invented and suffered the compromises over conventional jets so we could have cheaper, smaller carriers - then built full-size carriers to put it on!laughconfusedrolleyesweepingbanghead

But its been done to death...
They are pretty small carriers, and they don't have catapults, hence the hover jets.
Barring the US supercarriers HMS Queen Elizabeth is larger than any other jet age aircraft carrier. It is larger than the Midway class which served to 1992 and had a final air group with 4 squadrons of F18 and 2 A6 Intruders (68 fast jets), plus KCA6, E3, helicopters and COD aircraft.

If it had been designed with cats and traps it would have been much more effective, the hull is plenty big enough.

98elise

26,545 posts

161 months

Wednesday 14th October 2020
quotequote all
Talksteer said:
Dr Jekyll said:
Teddy Lop said:
the real brainbreaker is that we bought the hovver jet - the thing we invented and suffered the compromises over conventional jets so we could have cheaper, smaller carriers - then built full-size carriers to put it on!laughconfusedrolleyesweepingbanghead

But its been done to death...
They are pretty small carriers, and they don't have catapults, hence the hover jets.
Barring the US supercarriers HMS Queen Elizabeth is larger than any other jet age aircraft carrier. It is larger than the Midway class which served to 1992 and had a final air group with 4 squadrons of F18 and 2 A6 Intruders (68 fast jets), plus KCA6, E3, helicopters and COD aircraft.

If it had been designed with cats and traps it would have been much more effective, the hull is plenty big enough.
Agreed, they are in no way small. QE along side Illustrious...




Edited by 98elise on Wednesday 14th October 17:11

MartG

20,673 posts

204 months

Wednesday 14th October 2020
quotequote all
Talksteer said:
If it had been designed with cats and traps it would have been much more effective, the hull is plenty big enough.
Could have had a proper mix of aircraft - F-35C without the penalties of VTOL, E2 AWACS, etc.

Seight_Returns

1,640 posts

201 months

Thursday 15th October 2020
quotequote all
MartG said:
Talksteer said:
If it had been designed with cats and traps it would have been much more effective, the hull is plenty big enough.
Could have had a proper mix of aircraft - F-35C without the penalties of VTOL, E2 AWACS, etc.
A year ago I would have agreed unreservedly.

But the noises coming out of the US about how much more cost effective an America Class platform with an F-35B/Osprey/Rotary based airgroup would be compared to a Nimitz/Ford - increasingly suggest we may have backed the right horse.



Cold

15,244 posts

90 months

Thursday 15th October 2020
quotequote all
Guess who's back?


normalbloke

7,450 posts

219 months

Thursday 15th October 2020
quotequote all
I saw the guy sat at the front with a mini gun this time, as a first. The disposal tube for the brass was fairly long!

Cold

15,244 posts

90 months

Thursday 15th October 2020
quotequote all
normalbloke said:
I saw the guy sat at the front with a mini gun this time, as a first. The disposal tube for the brass was fairly long!
Good for fending off jet skiers. thumbup


normalbloke

7,450 posts

219 months

Monday 23rd November 2020
quotequote all
I notice the deck is almost completely ‘tented’ again, and the blast gear is on deck. Will it require re-coating or some sort of extensive reworking every time it comes back from flight ops? It certainly seems to be the case so far.