HMS Queen Elizabeth
Discussion
Steve vRS said:
Video of the jets taking off.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CHxB7fPiadg
How fast are they going when they leave the ski jump? On camera, they look slow but obviously that is an optical illusion.
Probably slow because they are taking off with a massive airbrake deployed. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CHxB7fPiadg
How fast are they going when they leave the ski jump? On camera, they look slow but obviously that is an optical illusion.
Cold said:
The video is mighty impressive in a dark and foreboding type of way, nice to see us (and one or two nation ships) putting out that carrier group, most advanced ever put to sea! Edit to say there’s going to be other stuff lurking under the depths, ours (U.K./USA) and possibly the odd Russian
Edited by Boom78 on Wednesday 7th October 18:27
Ayahuasca said:
Steve vRS said:
Video of the jets taking off.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CHxB7fPiadg
How fast are they going when they leave the ski jump? On camera, they look slow but obviously that is an optical illusion.
Probably slow because they are taking off with a massive airbrake deployed. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CHxB7fPiadg
How fast are they going when they leave the ski jump? On camera, they look slow but obviously that is an optical illusion.
normalbloke said:
normalbloke said:
Sloane’s A109 G-MAOL is parked on deck of the POW. What gives? FR shows it coming out of Buck Palace gardens straight to the carrier deck.
It was the Ukrainian president and his wife apparently.Edited by normalbloke on Wednesday 7th October 14:43
(Zelensky, is the short bloke, front/left)
In semi related news, the Russians have released the first official footage of a Zircon launch
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/36945/russia...
Mach 8 sounds like it might give the fleet air defenders a headache, although I assume it's a bit slower as it descends to the target.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/36945/russia...
Mach 8 sounds like it might give the fleet air defenders a headache, although I assume it's a bit slower as it descends to the target.
Dr Jekyll said:
Teddy Lop said:
the real brainbreaker is that we bought the hovver jet - the thing we invented and suffered the compromises over conventional jets so we could have cheaper, smaller carriers - then built full-size carriers to put it on!
But its been done to death...
They are pretty small carriers, and they don't have catapults, hence the hover jets.But its been done to death...
If it had been designed with cats and traps it would have been much more effective, the hull is plenty big enough.
Talksteer said:
Dr Jekyll said:
Teddy Lop said:
the real brainbreaker is that we bought the hovver jet - the thing we invented and suffered the compromises over conventional jets so we could have cheaper, smaller carriers - then built full-size carriers to put it on!
But its been done to death...
They are pretty small carriers, and they don't have catapults, hence the hover jets.But its been done to death...
If it had been designed with cats and traps it would have been much more effective, the hull is plenty big enough.
Edited by 98elise on Wednesday 14th October 17:11
MartG said:
Talksteer said:
If it had been designed with cats and traps it would have been much more effective, the hull is plenty big enough.
Could have had a proper mix of aircraft - F-35C without the penalties of VTOL, E2 AWACS, etc.But the noises coming out of the US about how much more cost effective an America Class platform with an F-35B/Osprey/Rotary based airgroup would be compared to a Nimitz/Ford - increasingly suggest we may have backed the right horse.
Gassing Station | Boats, Planes & Trains | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff