HMS Queen Elizabeth

Author
Discussion

martinmac

536 posts

197 months

Wednesday 4th July 2012
quotequote all
Its certainly getting busy up there with this and the new bridge going up. Its a tug spotters heaven.

Seight_Returns

1,640 posts

201 months

Wednesday 4th July 2012
quotequote all
doogz said:
Correct, yes.

It's likely that's how the T26 Frigates will be built as well.

Dynamic launches can be tricky things, and are must riskier than a float out.
Thanks.

Why was it not always done like this ? Seems a much less dramatic but much more controlled way of doing things.

Is it because we used to build more ships than we had dry docks available to build them in ? And presumably the pre-fabricated construction meansm that the dry dock is tied up for much less time.

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

198 months

Wednesday 4th July 2012
quotequote all
Seight_Returns said:
doogz said:
Correct, yes.

It's likely that's how the T26 Frigates will be built as well.

Dynamic launches can be tricky things, and are must riskier than a float out.
Thanks.

Why was it not always done like this ? Seems a much less dramatic but much more controlled way of doing things.

Is it because we used to build more ships than we had dry docks available to build them in ? And presumably the pre-fabricated construction meansm that the dry dock is tied up for much less time.
Because we didn't have CAD before. You need to be very accurate with the bits that you connect up for each section. Previously it was easier to build the frame, clad it, and then run the pipework / electrical services inside. That said they still get it wrong with modular builds.

Seight_Returns

1,640 posts

201 months

Wednesday 4th July 2012
quotequote all
Thanks again.

I get the modular build concept and how CAD has made that possible.

But my question was really more why we now build ships in dry docks and float them out - rather than building them on a slipway and pushing them down a slippery slope into the water. Even with the old "build a frame and clad it" construction method you could still build it in a dry dock and float it out ?

Godalmighty83

417 posts

254 months

Wednesday 4th July 2012
quotequote all
Any sort of slipway launch is much more complex and involved and has greater risk as the ship will still hit the water with a lot of energy and its a one shot deal, if it goes wrong in any fashion off to the scrappers. A dock flotation is much more controlled with no stress on the hull or surroundings if any problems are sighted the water can be immediately pumped back out for almost same day repair. We couldn't do this in the past as it would tie up a dock for far too long, but now we don't actually have any ships to fill the docks spaces so we have a couple spare for construction.

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

198 months

Wednesday 4th July 2012
quotequote all
Seight_Returns said:
Thanks again.

I get the modular build concept and how CAD has made that possible.

But my question was really more why we now build ships in dry docks and float them out - rather than building them on a slipway and pushing them down a slippery slope into the water. Even with the old "build a frame and clad it" construction method you could still build it in a dry dock and float it out ?
Because you can build more on land and them poke them out the back door when they're finished. Dry docks aren't cheap.

DDH is a good example where they're building the A-Class boats.


Edited by rhinochopig on Thursday 5th July 10:17

MBBlat

1,625 posts

149 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
A dynamic or slipway launch is simpler than the alternatives, hence the fact that its been used since the dawn of shipbuilding, but apart from the inherent risks & stresses imposed during the once in a lifetime event, for which additional structure is sometimes required, it imposes a couple of other constraints. Firstly the ship is constructed at an angle, rather than flat, and secondly there are usually weight limits for the launch which means that the vessel has to be outfitted while afloat.

The other alternative to a drydock or slipway is a shiplift, basically a big platform which can be lowered (slowly) down into the water. With a capacity of 23,400 tonnes the shiplift at Barrow used to launch the Astutes is one of the bigger ones, so its not really practical for CVF.

Having been involved in the concept design of CVF its interesting seeing her being put together.

Godalmighty83

417 posts

254 months

Sunday 14th October 2012
quotequote all
LB04 the biggest 'single piece' has just left its warehouse and is getting ready to be shipped and joined with the front half of the carrier in the coming weeks.

https://twitter.com/BAESystemsplc/status/257416623...
http://imageshack.us/scaled/landing/546/ohmsqueene...

Once welded on the carrier Will have the majority of its length and be significantly further through its build.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/qeclasscarriers/

If you're interested as to which block goes where, LB04 will soon be joined onto LB03, most of the CB's and SP's forward of that join are already on. A fair portion of the bits rearward of that join are done and waiting to go on.

http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/8134/blockalloc...

Godalmighty83

417 posts

254 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
I would expect any delays from now to be down to trying to get the big lump balanced and ballasted correctly, apparently that aspect is a bit of a pain in the backside due to the size and the shape of the unit.

Godalmighty83

417 posts

254 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
Barge related issue then, I have only seen one pic of it and it didn't look too pretty, but then again they never do.

bracken78

983 posts

206 months

Monday 15th October 2012
quotequote all
Godalmighty83 said:
Barge related issue then, I have only seen one pic of it and it didn't look too pretty, but then again they never do.
What happened to the AMT Trader, deck issues?

Semi hemi

1,796 posts

198 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
When is it due to sail? My ship is due to leave Peterhead tomorrow heading for Morecombe Bay/Liverpool Bay so hopefully we will pass it on the way.

Gazzas86

1,709 posts

171 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
Didn't see it when i drove into pompey dockyard today on the way to work....

Gazzas86

1,709 posts

171 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
doogz said:
Semi Hemi, not til the 3rd I think? Lots of sea fastening to be organised and whatnot.

Gazza, that's probably because it's here in Glasgow.
that will be why then...... wink


hidetheelephants

24,346 posts

193 months

Monday 5th November 2012
quotequote all
Block on its way now, passing west of the IoM at the moment. AIS report of the tug pulling the barge.

AshVX220

5,929 posts

190 months

Monday 5th November 2012
quotequote all
Wasn't it already delayed due to the weather predictions? I guess they decided better to get her there all be it late, rather than risk a trip north or keep hold of it until the weather clears.

Am in Rosyth today and tomorrow and QE's looking very good. Amazing to think how much of it's now in place and will in the dock by Christmas. smile

Gazzas86

1,709 posts

171 months

Monday 5th November 2012
quotequote all
I would love to get a Draft to QE, just a shame i've got a house down in Pompey, frownfrown

hidetheelephants

24,346 posts

193 months

Monday 5th November 2012
quotequote all
Gazzas86 said:
I would love to get a Draft to QE, just a shame i've got a house down in Pompey, frownfrown
That's alright, if you can afford a round of drinks you can afford to buy a house in fife!

King Herald

23,501 posts

216 months

Monday 5th November 2012
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Block on its way now, passing west of the IoM at the moment. AIS report of the tug pulling the barge.
It doesn't look very big, for part of a super carrier. confused



[img]http://farm9.static.flickr.com/8484/8154696065_0e0efdbe0d.jpg[img]

hidetheelephants

24,346 posts

193 months

Monday 5th November 2012
quotequote all
King Herald said:
It doesn't look very big, for part of a super carrier. confused
The deck area of the AMT Trader is 36m x 120m(100' x 400'), so the block is fairly big; I this is a 'those are small, these are far away' issue. hehe