This man enjoys his job

Author
Discussion

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

85,328 posts

265 months

Sunday 19th November 2017
quotequote all
UNRESTRICTED CLIMB TEST-FLIGHT of F16

(skip the first 2 mins)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5ekGZG6qUc

What's the sound at 3'34? (apart from the bloody bell) - blip of the throttle?

Gary C

12,399 posts

179 months

Sunday 19th November 2017
quotequote all
No idea about the sound

But the warton euro fighter was up over our house last week, thrashing about and using afterburner.

Jet fighter test pilots, what a job !

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

85,328 posts

265 months

Sunday 19th November 2017
quotequote all
Who would win the climb battle between the F16 and that cold war beast 'up to 60K feet in 30 secs but no fuel left' Lightning?

Gary C

12,399 posts

179 months

Monday 20th November 2017
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Who would win the climb battle between the F16 and that cold war beast 'up to 60K feet in 30 secs but no fuel left' Lightning?
I bet the Lightning. Some could go ballistic I believe.

Saw one over shell island beach stand the plane one its tail and go straight up under full after burner.

What a sight !

Gary C

12,399 posts

179 months

Monday 20th November 2017
quotequote all
Humm

Wiki has the f16 climbing at more than twice the rate of the Lightning. 50000feet/s against 20000f/s

I Love Cake

2,940 posts

171 months

Monday 20th November 2017
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
UNRESTRICTED CLIMB TEST-FLIGHT of F16

(skip the first 2 mins)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5ekGZG6qUc

What's the sound at 3'34? (apart from the bloody bell) - blip of the throttle?
That's the jet nozzle closing for the take off. Then the fun stuff happens, nozzle opens, and off you go on full after burner. (Sorry, that's about as technical as I can be!)


Edited by I Love Cake on Monday 20th November 04:50

CanAm

9,174 posts

272 months

Monday 20th November 2017
quotequote all
Gary C said:
Humm

Wiki has the f16 climbing at more than twice the rate of the Lightning. 50000feet/s against 20000f/s
That's 34,091 mph - bloody impressive! biggrin

V8 Fettler

7,019 posts

132 months

Monday 20th November 2017
quotequote all
Gary C said:
Humm

Wiki has the f16 climbing at more than twice the rate of the Lightning. 50000feet/s against 20000f/s
Is this with full weapons load? (fpm)

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

85,328 posts

265 months

Monday 20th November 2017
quotequote all
I Love Cake said:
That's the jet nozzle closing for the take off. Then the fun stuff happens, nozzle opens, and off you go on full after burner. (Sorry, that's about as technical as I can be!)
It didn't makes sense to me as it was about to touch down on a touch-and-go... so I thought he'd be throttling down not up...

Gary C

12,399 posts

179 months

Monday 20th November 2017
quotequote all
CanAm said:
Gary C said:
Humm

Wiki has the f16 climbing at more than twice the rate of the Lightning. 50000feet/s against 20000f/s
That's 34,091 mph - bloody impressive! biggrin
Oops, miss quote
Feet per minute !

Shar2

2,219 posts

213 months

Monday 20th November 2017
quotequote all
Gary C said:
Humm

Wiki has the f16 climbing at more than twice the rate of the Lightning. 50000feet/s against 20000f/s
But is that the initial rate of climb for the F-16 against constant rate of climb for the Lightning. If the Lightning could out climb an F-15, then I think it would have no problem against an F-16. To quote the book of wiki:-

"The Lightning possessed a remarkable climb rate. It was famous for its ability to rapidly rotate from takeoff to climb almost vertically from the runway, though this did not yield the best time-to-altitude. The Lightning's trademark tail-stand maneuver exchanged airspeed for altitude; it could slow to near-stall speeds before commencing level flight. The Lightning’s optimum climb profile required the use of afterburners during takeoff. Immediately after takeoff, the nose would be lowered for rapid acceleration to 430 knots (800 km/h) IAS before initiating a climb, stabilising at 450 knots (830 km/h). This would yield a constant climb rate of approximately 20,000 ft/min (100 m/s). Around 13,000 ft (4,000 m) the Lightning would reach Mach 0.87 (1,009 km/h) and maintain this speed until reaching the tropopause, 36,000 ft (11,000 m) on a standard day. If climbing further, pilots would accelerate to supersonic speed at the tropopause before resuming the climb. A Lightning flying at optimum climb profile would reach 36,000 ft (11,000 m) in under three minutes"

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

85,328 posts

265 months

Monday 20th November 2017
quotequote all
Useful info - and that's what counts when you're chasing Bears (or airliners flown by Middle Eastern gentlemen of dubious background)

Europa1

10,923 posts

188 months

Monday 20th November 2017
quotequote all
Shar2 said:
But is that the initial rate of climb for the F-16 against constant rate of climb for the Lightning. If the Lightning could out climb an F-15, then I think it would have no problem against an F-16. To quote the book of wiki:-

"The Lightning possessed a remarkable climb rate. It was famous for its ability to rapidly rotate from takeoff to climb almost vertically from the runway, though this did not yield the best time-to-altitude. The Lightning's trademark tail-stand maneuver exchanged airspeed for altitude; it could slow to near-stall speeds before commencing level flight. The Lightning’s optimum climb profile required the use of afterburners during takeoff. Immediately after takeoff, the nose would be lowered for rapid acceleration to 430 knots (800 km/h) IAS before initiating a climb, stabilising at 450 knots (830 km/h). This would yield a constant climb rate of approximately 20,000 ft/min (100 m/s). Around 13,000 ft (4,000 m) the Lightning would reach Mach 0.87 (1,009 km/h) and maintain this speed until reaching the tropopause, 36,000 ft (11,000 m) on a standard day. If climbing further, pilots would accelerate to supersonic speed at the tropopause before resuming the climb. A Lightning flying at optimum climb profile would reach 36,000 ft (11,000 m) in under three minutes"
I grew up near RAF Coltishall in the 1970s; loved watching the Lightnings take off.

Composite Guru

2,206 posts

203 months

Monday 20th November 2017
quotequote all
The F16 must have to be the best looking fighter ever produced. Such a stunning looking thing!! cool

Shar2

2,219 posts

213 months

Monday 20th November 2017
quotequote all
It's certainly come a long way from it's days as a lightweight fighter.

silverfoxcc

7,687 posts

145 months

Monday 20th November 2017
quotequote all
USAF alconbury open day 1972?

Lighting batted down the runway at about 50-100ft, then pointed upwards and disappreard in seconds.Lots of noise. only beaten by the yanks on base jaws hitting the tarmac

Smug smiles from all the brits, having just before seen four F4 doing 'A fast pass' according to the commentator Yea my ford angiai could have out run them

Simpo Two

Original Poster:

85,328 posts

265 months

Monday 20th November 2017
quotequote all
silverfoxcc said:
Lighting batted down the runway at about 50-100ft, then pointed upwards and disappreard in seconds.Lots of noise.
The Lightning 'tail stand' is never forgotten - I saw mine at RAF Wattisham c.1976 and the ground shook.

grumpy52

5,571 posts

166 months

Monday 20th November 2017
quotequote all
We had Lightenings based in Singapore when I was out there in the 60s .
Was absolutely fantastic to watch them take off then tail stand and blast to the heavens.
We had a free display most of the time watching all manner of things doing practice or training sorties .
A time of many long gone and spectacular aircraft that fascinated this enthusiastic schoolboy .

V8 Fettler

7,019 posts

132 months

Monday 20th November 2017
quotequote all
20,000 fpm seems slow for a Lightning, although variation between variants.

I doubt if there is a definitive website for rates of climb, but this site states 50,000 fpm https://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.as...

Someone with some time to spare could make comparisons using empty weight, maximum take off weight and thrust.

Brian Carroll on Lightning vs F-15: http://www.thunder-and-lightnings.co.uk/lightning/...

Only the Lightning overhauled Concorde.

texaxile

3,290 posts

150 months

Monday 20th November 2017
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
The Lightning 'tail stand' is never forgotten - I saw mine at RAF Wattisham c.1976 and the ground shook.
We had a school trip there in 76 (It was bloody hot on that day I remember that). Went into the radar room and had a look in the hangars. If memory serves me they had some Phantoms there back then and also some lightnings. We were allowed to "look but do not touch ANYTHING".

Wasn't there an old lightning in a Scrapyard somewhere on the A1 visible from the road years ago?.