707 Crash in Iran

Author
Discussion

V41LEY

Original Poster:

2,893 posts

238 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
Being reported. 707 ? Really !

NormalWisdom

2,139 posts

159 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
V41LEY said:
Being reported. 707 ? Really !
Yes. Why?

More concerning is the fact the B707 might have been trying to land at the wrong airport!!

HoHoHo

14,987 posts

250 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
Sad for all concerned.

By chance I spent quite a long time on YouTube last night watching films about the 707's being used in Iran.

I think from memory there still 16 or so flying around the world (possibly 15 now frown ) and what a great aircraft it is and a testament to the design they are still flying today.

I remember leaving Iran January 1978 as a youngster after the Shah was deposed on a BA 707 and having to divert to Kuwait because the aircraft went tech as we were on the take off roll. A massive bang, the aircraft shook violently but we were on our way. Many hours later as we left Kuwait to finish our journey home the Captain apologised for the delay simply saying (and I can remember him saying this to this day) "the aircraft wasn't airworthy when we left Mehrabad Airport but we had no option to continue on our way".............I'm hoping he was just referring to a burst tyre or similar!

captain_cynic

11,990 posts

95 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
V41LEY said:
Being reported. 707 ? Really !
Still in service. Israel still has 9 as aerial refuelling tankers. Same with DC-8's and the old de Haviland Comet (as the Hawker Siddeley Nimrod) a few still in service.

The 707 and DC-8 were produced up until 1972, its not surprising that some of the airframes are still in service, especially somewhere like Iran where they cant easily get new Boeing or Airbus aircraft.

Trevatanus

11,122 posts

150 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
I remember seeing a 707 crash (or the aftermath ) at Heathrow in the 1980's!

linky added

https://www.airliners.net/photo/Iran-Air/Boeing-70...

tim0409

4,404 posts

159 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
V41LEY said:
Being reported. 707 ? Really !
I also read that the 727 had its last commercial flight today in Iran.

essayer

9,065 posts

194 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
Looks like they tried to land at the tiny airfield to the east of ‘Farrokhabad’ instead of the larger one
Confirmation bias in low visibility?

surveyor

17,817 posts

184 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
I think this is down to the Embargo which prevents them buying new planes.

Norwegian have a plan stuck there after they shut down an engine due to low oil pressure and took the land at nearest suitable airport very literally and spiraled down, rather than going just a few miles further. They are now tied up in red tape as they try to get an exemption to fly an engine in, so that they can retrieve their fairly new Boeing 737 Max...

Krikkit

26,527 posts

181 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
surveyor said:
Norwegian have a plan stuck there after they shut down an engine due to low oil pressure and took the land at nearest suitable airport very literally and spiraled down, rather than going just a few miles further. They are now tied up in red tape as they try to get an exemption to fly an engine in, so that they can retrieve their fairly new Boeing 737 Max...
Could they strip the seats out to reduce the weight and fly it out on a single engine?

Eric Mc

122,010 posts

265 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
If you include the Boeing E3 family of aircraft, there are quite a few 707s still flying. The E-3 is essentially a Boeing 707 fitted out with surveillance equipment. If you spread the definition of "707" a bit wider and include the C-135 variants, you actually have a few hundred airframes still in active use.

The C-135 differs in many ways from the true 707 design so it is more of a cousin rather than an actual 707 version.

surveyor

17,817 posts

184 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
Could they strip the seats out to reduce the weight and fly it out on a single engine?
From my limited knowledge... The rudder does not become effective until airspeed has built-up. If the pilots goose the throttle to build up the airspeed, the plane gets muddy. If the pilots feed in power gently to build up airspeed it runs out of runway... That's assuming they can find a pilot to try it anyway...

As a rule no twin engines will take off on a single engine. Some four engine aircraft (747 for one) can be ferried on 3 engines though...

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

261 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
captain_cynic said:
Still in service. Israel still has 9 as aerial refuelling tankers. Same with DC-8's and the old de Haviland Comet (as the Hawker Siddeley Nimrod) a few still in service.
No Nimrods anymore.

nikaiyo2

4,720 posts

195 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
Is N707JT still flying?

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
Ok aero fact lovers, answer me this:

What is the oldest airframe still flying in regular service anywhere in the world??


(regular service should be timetabled, normal service, in any country?)


My bets are on some old single prop driven high wing crate chugging round Alaska or somewhere equally remote??

surveyor

17,817 posts

184 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Ok aero fact lovers, answer me this:

What is the oldest airframe still flying in regular service anywhere in the world??


(regular service should be timetabled, normal service, in any country?)


My bets are on some old single prop driven high wing crate chugging round Alaska or somewhere equally remote??
BA’s 747’s should qualify....

FourWheelDrift

88,506 posts

284 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Ok aero fact lovers, answer me this:

What is the oldest airframe still flying in regular service anywhere in the world??


(regular service should be timetabled, normal service, in any country?)


My bets are on some old single prop driven high wing crate chugging round Alaska or somewhere equally remote??
Probably one of Buffalo Airway's DC-3s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_Airways

Trevatanus

11,122 posts

150 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
nikaiyo2 said:
Is N707JT still flying?
Nope

  1. 1
2 years ago

John Travolta has decided to donate his 707-138B (N707JT) to HARS, located near Sydney in Australia.

"It gives me great pleasure to make this exciting historical announcement that my beloved Boeing 707 aircraft has been donated to the Historical Aircraft Restoration society (HARS) based in the town of Albion Park, approximately 90 miles (140 km) south of the city of Sydney in Australia."

Superleg48

1,524 posts

133 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
captain_cynic said:
Still in service. Israel still has 9 as aerial refuelling tankers. Same with DC-8's and the old de Haviland Comet (as the Hawker Siddeley Nimrod) a few still in service.
The 707 refuelling tankers are actually designated as KC-135s, but are indeed based on 707. .


FourWheelDrift

88,506 posts

284 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
We still fly them too (another variant) - https://www.raf.mod.uk/aircraft/airseeker-rc-135w-...

Eric Mc

122,010 posts

265 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
Superleg48 said:
captain_cynic said:
Still in service. Israel still has 9 as aerial refuelling tankers. Same with DC-8's and the old de Haviland Comet (as the Hawker Siddeley Nimrod) a few still in service.
The 707 refuelling tankers are actually designated as KC-135s, but are indeed based on 707. .
Not quite. Strictly speaking, the C-135 variants are based on the Boeing 367-80 prototype of what SHOULD have been the 707. After the 367-80 first flew, Douglas announced their DC-8 - and they stated that the DC-8 would have six abreast seating. The original intention for the 707 was that it would have five abreast seating. Boeing therefore reconfigured the production 707 design by widening the fuselage diameter so that it too would feature six abreast seating. However, the C-135 family retained the narrower fuselage of the 367-80 prototype and some other earlier features.

If you want a technical history of the fairly varying family tree of the 707 and its ancestors and relatives, I'd recommend this -



And I've not even mentioned the Boeing 720 yet.