Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 3)

Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 3)

Author
Discussion

MartG

20,668 posts

204 months

Tuesday 12th January 2021
quotequote all
One of my alltime favourite aircraft designs smile


Eric Mc

121,960 posts

265 months

Tuesday 12th January 2021
quotequote all
Me too - way ahead of its time.

irocfan

40,394 posts

190 months

Tuesday 12th January 2021
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
A 109 with a bubble canopy would have been interesting. I understand that visibility was one of the 109’s weaknesses.
On that subject - would I be right to assume that the 109 canopy (others too eg Hurricane) helped structurally, if not what's the point?

Eric Mc

121,960 posts

265 months

Tuesday 12th January 2021
quotequote all
No - no structural role as far as the airframe is concerned.

The canopies were designed that way because, in the mid 1930s, that was the only way to ensure they didn't cave in to the air pressure generated by an airflow that could exceed 400 mph.

irocfan

40,394 posts

190 months

Tuesday 12th January 2021
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
No - no structural role as far as the airframe is concerned.

The canopies were designed that way because, in the mid 1930s, that was the only way to ensure they didn't cave in to the air pressure generated by an airflow that could exceed 400 mph.
thumbup thanks

Eric Mc

121,960 posts

265 months

Tuesday 12th January 2021
quotequote all
It was the introduction of plastic layering into the process (plexiglass) that allowed canopies to be strong without the need for heavy framing. The Spitfire was one of the first to make use of the process.

All Spitfires had a low frame count - even the very early Mk Is.

Within a year, the early MkI canopies had been improved by a "blown" sliding section.

Later in the war, a fully blown canopy was introduced -

This picture of 19 Squadron Spitfires at Duxford in 1938 shows the original "flat" sliding hood together with some of the first Spitfires fitted with the "blown" version.




This is the fully blown type of hood -




DeltonaS

3,707 posts

138 months

Wednesday 13th January 2021
quotequote all

irocfan

40,394 posts

190 months

Wednesday 13th January 2021
quotequote all

Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

279 months

Wednesday 13th January 2021
quotequote all
irocfan said:
Lose the weight of the ordnance and you don’t need the wings to be as big anymore.

nre

533 posts

270 months

Wednesday 13th January 2021
quotequote all
More recently

Douglas Skyraider by Nigel Eite, on Flickr


Smollet

10,541 posts

190 months

Wednesday 13th January 2021
quotequote all
nre said:
More recently

Douglas Skyraider by Nigel Eite, on Flickr
Oooh. What a machine. Iirc it could carry more ordnance than a B17.

nre

533 posts

270 months

Thursday 14th January 2021
quotequote all
Smollet said:
nre said:
More recently

Douglas Skyraider by Nigel Eite, on Flickr
Oooh. What a machine. Iirc it could carry more ordnance than a B17.
It is, but the main reason for posting it is that it's also missing the end of its wing. Not through battle damage but for trying to fly into a space already occupied by a Mustang.

Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

279 months

Thursday 14th January 2021
quotequote all
The engine appears to be running rather rich.

MartG

20,668 posts

204 months

Thursday 14th January 2021
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
The engine appears to be running rather rich.
Oh, they all do that sir !

Eric Mc

121,960 posts

265 months

Thursday 14th January 2021
quotequote all
Exactly. Skyraiders always spewed oil.

Some colour schemes used had the fuselage aft of the engine painted black just to hide the stains.


Lily the Pink

5,783 posts

170 months

Thursday 14th January 2021
quotequote all
nre said:
Not through battle damage but for trying to fly into a space already occupied by a Mustang.
I'm sure the pilot would dispute that. Assuming the Mustang was the faster aircraft (?) then the Skyraider would surely have been in that bit of airspace first.

FourWheelDrift

88,495 posts

284 months

Thursday 14th January 2021
quotequote all
Lily the Pink said:
nre said:
Not through battle damage but for trying to fly into a space already occupied by a Mustang.
I'm sure the pilot would dispute that. Assuming the Mustang was the faster aircraft (?) then the Skyraider would surely have been in that bit of airspace first.
Skyraider flew into the Mustang - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oJngucEac4

Eric Mc

121,960 posts

265 months

Thursday 14th January 2021
quotequote all
Yep, it was the Skyraider's fault. He pulled up too steeply and clipped the P-51.

RizzoTheRat

25,140 posts

192 months

Friday 15th January 2021
quotequote all
Just seen this on Twitter, Sea Fury on takeoff.



The guy has a pretty interesting feed

https://twitter.com/ron_eisele

Skyrocket21

775 posts

42 months

Sunday 17th January 2021
quotequote all
I've been an aviation enthusiast all my life, especially regarding military planes. My parents were discussing their trip to the Exeter Airport airshow in 1969. So I looked for photos of that show, up popped this plane, I know a lot about the Blackburn Buccaneer that replaced it and the Harriers, Tornados, Lightnings etc. I've never seen one of these, a Supermarine Scimatar, it looks like the Harrier inherited a lot of DNA from this design, only ever 76 built, is it a forgotten plane?