Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 3)
Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 3)
Author
Discussion

havoc

32,323 posts

255 months

Thursday 30th October
quotequote all
DodgyGeezer said:
Not amazingly cool per se, but i figured this might be of interest. We're in Hang Zhou at the mo and several lots of these noisy buggers flew over us (apols for poor pic quality, rushed phone pic)




Bottom pic clearly some flavour of Flanker, but the top one intrigues me. Looks a bit Jaguar-esque, but can't think of a PLA equivalent (Edit: Google has thrown up the JH7A, if still in service)

PRTVR

7,891 posts

241 months

Thursday 30th October
quotequote all
You wouldn't get a reply, he is in prison for spying. hehe

DodgyGeezer

45,530 posts

210 months

Thursday 30th October
quotequote all
PRTVR said:
You wouldn't get a reply, he is in prison for spying. hehe
rofl

silentbrown

10,207 posts

136 months

Thursday 30th October
quotequote all
MartG said:
The F7U-3 Cutlass ramp strike on USS Hancock (CVA-19) in 1955, one of the most infamous naval jet landing accidents ever.

The jet impacted the stern of the flight deck. It broke apart; the cockpit section tumbled down the deck. Miraculously, pilot Ensign B. L. Winterrowd survived, suffering only minor injuries.

Pilot didn't survive that, sadly.

“The Cutlass could be made into a pretty good flying machine with a few modifications,” wrote F7U-3 pilot John Moore in The Wrong Stuff, about his Navy flying days. “Like a conventional tail, tripling the thrust, cutting the nosewheel strut in half, completely redoing the flight control system, and getting someone else to fly it.”

About 6:20 in this video


https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/...

https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/249790


xeny

5,369 posts

98 months

Friday 31st October
quotequote all
havoc said:
Bottom pic clearly some flavour of Flanker, but the top one intrigues me. Looks a bit Jaguar-esque, but can't think of a PLA equivalent (Edit: Google has thrown up the JH7A, if still in service)
I was thinking top secret TSR-2 clone.

mko9

2,853 posts

232 months

Friday 31st October
quotequote all
havoc said:
DodgyGeezer said:
Not amazingly cool per se, but i figured this might be of interest. We're in Hang Zhou at the mo and several lots of these noisy buggers flew over us (apols for poor pic quality, rushed phone pic)




Bottom pic clearly some flavour of Flanker, but the top one intrigues me. Looks a bit Jaguar-esque, but can't think of a PLA equivalent (Edit: Google has thrown up the JH7A, if still in service)
I guess that is a FLOUNDER, but it is really hard to tell with that image quality. It certainly isn't a FLANKER variant or a FIREBIRD.

havoc

32,323 posts

255 months

Friday 31st October
quotequote all
Yeah - I think so - JH-7 / -7A Flounder. Looks like the bd offspring of a Jaguar and a TSR-2, but who knows...

DodgyGeezer

45,530 posts

210 months

Friday 31st October
quotequote all
havoc said:
Yeah - I think so - JH-7 / -7A Flounder. Looks like the bd offspring of a Jaguar and a TSR-2, but who knows...
It certainly seemed noisier than the following 4 did eek

Austin Prefect

1,394 posts

12 months

Saturday 1st November
quotequote all
havoc said:
Yeah - I think so - JH-7 / -7A Flounder. Looks like the bd offspring of a Jaguar and a TSR-2, but who knows...
It looks to me like a Tornado without swing wings.

Baron Greenback

7,580 posts

170 months

Sunday 2nd November
quotequote all


How I have not heard of this before the longest non-stop flight, February 7, 1959, the Cessna had been up in the air for 64 days, 22 hours, 19 minutes, and 5 seconds. Refueling twice a day and including oil and filter change while engine was running.
No windscreen wipers.

Voldemort

7,102 posts

298 months

Thursday 6th November
quotequote all
The new livery the BBMF Lancaster will wear when it returns in 2027


a340driver

566 posts

175 months

Thursday 6th November
quotequote all
DodgyGeezer said:
they still look like something out of a scifi film cloud9



https://vintageaviationnews.com/warbird-articles/t...
It was a beast, although much like a TVR, in it's later life looked better from a distance, This was taken in the last year of 55Sqn from a Hawk.


The view out of a Victor was pretty awful.

Edited by a340driver on Thursday 6th November 19:17

Austin Prefect

1,394 posts

12 months

Thursday 6th November
quotequote all
I was once told one of the Victor's designers had worked for Martin on the Seamaster and it seems plausible.


eharding

14,648 posts

304 months

Thursday 6th November
quotequote all
a340driver said:
The view out of a Victor was pretty awful.
Much like a Griffith 500 - the view out of the windscreen was just fine, but if you wanted to see where you were probably going you need to look out of the side windows. Still miss it though.

a340driver

566 posts

175 months

Thursday 6th November
quotequote all
Austin Prefect said:
I was once told one of the Victor's designers had worked for Martin on the Seamaster and it seems plausible.

Possibly, I know not.

a340driver

566 posts

175 months

Thursday 6th November
quotequote all
eharding said:
Much like a Griffith 500 - the view out of the windscreen was just fine, but if you wanted to see where you were probably going you need to look out of the side windows. Still miss it though.
Sounds exactly like the Victor in a crosswind. I don't miss it. I've been lucky to fly lots of frankly better aircraft albeit nowhere as weird. It had the H2S radar from the Lancaster! When you planned a trip across the pond you had to preselect your ILS frequencies because you had a choice of 6 crystals which were only changed by ground engineers. So your diversion choices were frozen from the planning stage.

I've been grateful that the windows on modern aircraft allow you to see out when you're given a 40kt crosswind.

eharding

14,648 posts

304 months

Thursday 6th November
quotequote all
a340driver said:
When you planned a trip across the pond you had to preselect your ILS frequencies because you had a choice of 6 crystals which were only changed by ground engineers. So your diversion choices were frozen from the planning stage.
Much the same as the ADF in my old Yak-52 - apparently the small set of available frequencies was preselected by engineers on the ground, although in that case the reason was apparently that a budding young Soviet-bloc aviator who decided to defect to the West wasn't able to arbitrarily navigate using NDBs he wasn't supposed to. Presumably also stopped them using the ADF to listen to the cricket, which just goes to show how morally bankrupt the Soviet system was.

Riff Raff

5,422 posts

215 months

Sunday 9th November
quotequote all
Voldemort said:
The new livery the BBMF Lancaster will wear when it returns in 2027

My Dad flew the bulk of his operations in IX Squadron's WS D. Here's a photo of him and presumably the rest of the crew plus the ground crew in front of it. The pilot (who was an Aussie) seems to have gone AWOL in this photo, which was probably taken at RAF Bardney in 1944. My Dad is the central one of the three in battledress under the roundel.



Speed 3

5,164 posts

139 months

Thursday 13th November
quotequote all

Eric Mc

124,428 posts

285 months

Thursday 13th November
quotequote all
Speed 3 said:
Artwork from the Italeri 1/72 model kit.




The kit was originally issued by AMT -