Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 2)

Post amazingly cool pictures of aircraft (Volume 2)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

blueg33

35,893 posts

224 months

Sunday 17th September 2017
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
blueg33 said:
Were there not kills in the Falklands war? I am sure I read about harriers making air to air kills.
:cough: Royal Navy Sea Harriers :cough:
Some RAF pilots I think smile

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

261 months

Sunday 17th September 2017
quotequote all
blueg33 said:
Some RAF pilots I think smile
True

In the only wars since 1950 with the UK having responsibility for a significant air to air element (Korea and Falklands) it's been the responsibility of the Royal Navy.

In GW1 there were some RAF fighters in Saudi for air defence, and there's a report they did have an Iraqi jet in their sights at one time but a Saudi pilot was tracking the same jet and took the shot.

In the Malaya/Indonesia conflict there were rumours of a Gloster Javelin shooting down an Indonesian C130. These seem to be a combination of the Indonesians losing a C130 for unexplained reasons and a Javelin returning to base with one less missile than it set off with. The missile was officially attributed to an emergency jettison (though it didn't look like that to the ground crew). The C130 is generally thought to have just crashed but it suited UK interests at the time for the Indonesians to think it might have been shot down.

There is also a suggestion that a Vampire or Venom may have shot down a MIG-15 during the Suez campaign.

Even if these are both true, RAF jet fighters have had fewer air to air kills than USAF B52s.

Eric Mc

122,029 posts

265 months

Sunday 17th September 2017
quotequote all
HowlerMonkey said:
Eric Mc said:
They are. The removal of the air scoop under the fuselage on Galloping Ghost was a contributory factor to the buckling of the fuselage which led to loss of control.
Incorrect.................the fuselage survived at least 12Gs and was still pulling 12gs at the time of impact.

We also have an almost identical event in 1998 with the only difference being that the plane ended up at altitude instead of crashing.
One of the pictures taken seconds before the fatal pull up showed the rear fuselage buckling just after the loss of the trim tab. The immediate cause of the accident was the loss of the trim tab - of course.

When you say "we also had a almost identical event in 1998", any chance you could elaborate? I'm not being sceptical - I am genuinely interested. Was it another modified Mustang?

MartG

20,677 posts

204 months

Sunday 17th September 2017
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
Even if these are both true, RAF jet fighters have had fewer air to air kills than USAF B52s.
Deterrence at work perhaps wink

MartG

20,677 posts

204 months

Sunday 17th September 2017
quotequote all



wink

HowlerMonkey

106 posts

169 months

Sunday 17th September 2017
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
One of the pictures taken seconds before the fatal pull up showed the rear fuselage buckling just after the loss of the trim tab. The immediate cause of the accident was the loss of the trim tab - of course.

When you say "we also had a almost identical event in 1998", any chance you could elaborate? I'm not being sceptical - I am genuinely interested. Was it another modified Mustang?
Bob "hurricane" Hanna, the former motocross champion was piloting an airplane named Voodoo.............which is racing today at reno for the championship.

http://airrace.org/ will have live streaming of the race pretty soon if not already.

The skin "oil canning" is not "buckling" and many planes do that.

I know the picture you are going to post and it was not on the lap of the accident.

Rare Bear, Dreadnought, Czechmate, and a few others have shown the same thing.



http://www.aafo.com/hangartalk/showthread.php?910-...

http://www.aafo.com/hangartalk/showthread.php?8064...


Eric Mc

122,029 posts

265 months

Sunday 17th September 2017
quotequote all
I wasn't intending to post any pictures to be honest. I watched the NTSB video on the investigation into Galloping Ghost's accident a while ago and they showed images of the "oil canning". They didn't consider it irrelevant.

blueedge

360 posts

197 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
MartG said:
Laarbruch - pic of everyone on the base ( sorry, no idea of the date )

Google says it was taken 3rd November 1989 for the Daily Star.

Druid

1,312 posts

181 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
blueedge said:
Google says it was taken 3rd November 1989 for the Daily Star.
I arrived there September 1989. Don't remember that. I would understand them leaving me out though!

Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

279 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
blueedge said:
Google says it was taken 3rd November 1989 for the Daily Star.
What was the black Sierra estate for?

yellowjack

17,077 posts

166 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
What was the black Sierra estate for?
MT fleet car or 'staff car' of some sort.

The army and RAF always had "civilian" cars in the fleet. Serviced and maintained 'in house' too. Almost always black and, unless it was specifically a CO's staff car, almost always a base model.

When we used to go to RAF St Athan in the early 80s I remember there were a lot of black Cortinas and Escorts about the place. Some even had a yellow stripe with 'RAF' written on the side.

Later on I recall the workhorse of the army fleet being the three-door MkIII Escort estate, in 'Popular' trim. Then terrorism took a hand, and the IRA started to carry out more attacks on the mainland UK and in Europe. The black cars were too easy to spot as military and the fleet began to change to 'various basic colours' to blend in more.

MT types in the military refer to the vehicle fleets as "Green Fleet" ('proper' military vehicles for war fighting, usually painted green or green/black camo), "Grey Fleet" (MOD owned vehicles that don't fit into the "Green Fleet" category) - my last unit had some LWB Hi-Cap Iveco vans for transporting stuff like the regimental dive team to tasks in support of EOD & Search operations, and "White Fleet" vehicles. Most "civilian" vehicles in military use are now supplied as an 'on demand' lease basis by companies like Lex. Supposedly to save money by only having vehicles on site when they're actually going to be used rather than sitting around quietly depreciating and costing money in idle servicing.

So in the days when that photo was taken, if an airman needed a car to carry out a task, he'd put in a requisition form to MT and they'd allocate one of their black estate cars to him for the duration of the task. Otherwise that car would be sat idle in the MT yard. Now, you want a car, you put in a requisition form in good time, MT demand a car through the local MT hub, they task Lex to deliver a vehicle to the unit and the soldier/airman uses it for as long as needed. The idea then is to use that one car as efficiently as possible while it's in the unit, but when it has a gap in it's schedule it either goes back to Lex or up the road to another local unit. Even CO's cars are leased this way now, and they go back to Lex when servicing becomes due or there are faults with the vehicle. The MOD just pay for their useage, and if it's not serviceable for some reason then Lex (or whichever fleet lease company are fulfilling the contract) pick up the tab for repairs and get to have to supply another car.

In short, those black cars tended not (in my experience) to have a specific role/use, but were almost "squadron runabouts" although their use was more closely monitored and accounted for.

LotusOmega375D

7,615 posts

153 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
What was the black Sierra estate for?
Target practice.

JuniorD

8,626 posts

223 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
kapiteinlangzaam said:
MartG said:


RAF Germany scenery shot with Bruggen Phantoms, Laarbruch Buccaneer, Wildenrath Harrier and Gutersloh Lightning seen over the Maas-river near Roermond, 1975. RAF/Crown copyright.
You can just about see my house in that photo.

Very cool!
When I look at that photo the first thought I have is my goodness that must have been loud

Ayahuasca

27,427 posts

279 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
MT fleet car or 'staff car' of some sort.

The army and RAF always had "civilian" cars in the fleet. Serviced and maintained 'in house' too. Almost always black and, unless it was specifically a CO's staff car, almost always a base model.

When we used to go to RAF St Athan in the early 80s I remember there were a lot of black Cortinas and Escorts about the place. Some even had a yellow stripe with 'RAF' written on the side.

Later on I recall the workhorse of the army fleet being the three-door MkIII Escort estate, in 'Popular' trim. Then terrorism took a hand, and the IRA started to carry out more attacks on the mainland UK and in Europe. The black cars were too easy to spot as military and the fleet began to change to 'various basic colours' to blend in more.

MT types in the military refer to the vehicle fleets as "Green Fleet" ('proper' military vehicles for war fighting, usually painted green or green/black camo), "Grey Fleet" (MOD owned vehicles that don't fit into the "Green Fleet" category) - my last unit had some LWB Hi-Cap Iveco vans for transporting stuff like the regimental dive team to tasks in support of EOD & Search operations, and "White Fleet" vehicles. Most "civilian" vehicles in military use are now supplied as an 'on demand' lease basis by companies like Lex. Supposedly to save money by only having vehicles on site when they're actually going to be used rather than sitting around quietly depreciating and costing money in idle servicing.

So in the days when that photo was taken, if an airman needed a car to carry out a task, he'd put in a requisition form to MT and they'd allocate one of their black estate cars to him for the duration of the task. Otherwise that car would be sat idle in the MT yard. Now, you want a car, you put in a requisition form in good time, MT demand a car through the local MT hub, they task Lex to deliver a vehicle to the unit and the soldier/airman uses it for as long as needed. The idea then is to use that one car as efficiently as possible while it's in the unit, but when it has a gap in it's schedule it either goes back to Lex or up the road to another local unit. Even CO's cars are leased this way now, and they go back to Lex when servicing becomes due or there are faults with the vehicle. The MOD just pay for their useage, and if it's not serviceable for some reason then Lex (or whichever fleet lease company are fulfilling the contract) pick up the tab for repairs and get to have to supply another car.

In short, those black cars tended not (in my experience) to have a specific role/use, but were almost "squadron runabouts" although their use was more closely monitored and accounted for.
Cheers. Surprised they didn't seem to make much use of the LR Defender for airfield runabout duties.

eccles

13,733 posts

222 months

Tuesday 19th September 2017
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
yellowjack said:
MT fleet car or 'staff car' of some sort.

The army and RAF always had "civilian" cars in the fleet. Serviced and maintained 'in house' too. Almost always black and, unless it was specifically a CO's staff car, almost always a base model.

When we used to go to RAF St Athan in the early 80s I remember there were a lot of black Cortinas and Escorts about the place. Some even had a yellow stripe with 'RAF' written on the side.

Later on I recall the workhorse of the army fleet being the three-door MkIII Escort estate, in 'Popular' trim. Then terrorism took a hand, and the IRA started to carry out more attacks on the mainland UK and in Europe. The black cars were too easy to spot as military and the fleet began to change to 'various basic colours' to blend in more.

MT types in the military refer to the vehicle fleets as "Green Fleet" ('proper' military vehicles for war fighting, usually painted green or green/black camo), "Grey Fleet" (MOD owned vehicles that don't fit into the "Green Fleet" category) - my last unit had some LWB Hi-Cap Iveco vans for transporting stuff like the regimental dive team to tasks in support of EOD & Search operations, and "White Fleet" vehicles. Most "civilian" vehicles in military use are now supplied as an 'on demand' lease basis by companies like Lex. Supposedly to save money by only having vehicles on site when they're actually going to be used rather than sitting around quietly depreciating and costing money in idle servicing.

So in the days when that photo was taken, if an airman needed a car to carry out a task, he'd put in a requisition form to MT and they'd allocate one of their black estate cars to him for the duration of the task. Otherwise that car would be sat idle in the MT yard. Now, you want a car, you put in a requisition form in good time, MT demand a car through the local MT hub, they task Lex to deliver a vehicle to the unit and the soldier/airman uses it for as long as needed. The idea then is to use that one car as efficiently as possible while it's in the unit, but when it has a gap in it's schedule it either goes back to Lex or up the road to another local unit. Even CO's cars are leased this way now, and they go back to Lex when servicing becomes due or there are faults with the vehicle. The MOD just pay for their useage, and if it's not serviceable for some reason then Lex (or whichever fleet lease company are fulfilling the contract) pick up the tab for repairs and get to have to supply another car.

In short, those black cars tended not (in my experience) to have a specific role/use, but were almost "squadron runabouts" although their use was more closely monitored and accounted for.
Cheers. Surprised they didn't seem to make much use of the LR Defender for airfield runabout duties.
On our unit we had a couple of MF50 tractors (square cabbed thing top of picture) to tow the aircraft and be used as a runaround. Each trade had their own Landrover, either a lightweight or at about the time the photo was taken, a defender. There was also a Hawson bodied Bedford CF for moving larger stuff and peri track racing.

MartG

20,677 posts

204 months

Tuesday 19th September 2017
quotequote all

MartG

20,677 posts

204 months

Tuesday 19th September 2017
quotequote all

Ginetta G15 Girl

3,220 posts

184 months

Tuesday 19th September 2017
quotequote all
MartG said:
Photo of Albert
C-130E model or earlier.

tuffer

8,849 posts

267 months

Wednesday 20th September 2017
quotequote all
yellowjack said:
Ayahuasca said:
What was the black Sierra estate for?
MT fleet car or 'staff car' of some sort.

The army and RAF always had "civilian" cars in the fleet. Serviced and maintained 'in house' too. Almost always black and, unless it was specifically a CO's staff car, almost always a base model.

When we used to go to RAF St Athan in the early 80s I remember there were a lot of black Cortinas and Escorts about the place. Some even had a yellow stripe with 'RAF' written on the side.

Later on I recall the workhorse of the army fleet being the three-door MkIII Escort estate, in 'Popular' trim. Then terrorism took a hand, and the IRA started to carry out more attacks on the mainland UK and in Europe. The black cars were too easy to spot as military and the fleet began to change to 'various basic colours' to blend in more.

MT types in the military refer to the vehicle fleets as "Green Fleet" ('proper' military vehicles for war fighting, usually painted green or green/black camo), "Grey Fleet" (MOD owned vehicles that don't fit into the "Green Fleet" category) - my last unit had some LWB Hi-Cap Iveco vans for transporting stuff like the regimental dive team to tasks in support of EOD & Search operations, and "White Fleet" vehicles. Most "civilian" vehicles in military use are now supplied as an 'on demand' lease basis by companies like Lex. Supposedly to save money by only having vehicles on site when they're actually going to be used rather than sitting around quietly depreciating and costing money in idle servicing.

So in the days when that photo was taken, if an airman needed a car to carry out a task, he'd put in a requisition form to MT and they'd allocate one of their black estate cars to him for the duration of the task. Otherwise that car would be sat idle in the MT yard. Now, you want a car, you put in a requisition form in good time, MT demand a car through the local MT hub, they task Lex to deliver a vehicle to the unit and the soldier/airman uses it for as long as needed. The idea then is to use that one car as efficiently as possible while it's in the unit, but when it has a gap in it's schedule it either goes back to Lex or up the road to another local unit. Even CO's cars are leased this way now, and they go back to Lex when servicing becomes due or there are faults with the vehicle. The MOD just pay for their useage, and if it's not serviceable for some reason then Lex (or whichever fleet lease company are fulfilling the contract) pick up the tab for repairs and get to have to supply another car.

In short, those black cars tended not (in my experience) to have a specific role/use, but were almost "squadron runabouts" although their use was more closely monitored and accounted for.
We also had a fleet of purple Corsas when I was at Laarbruch in the mid 90's, they were truly awful.

Voldemort

6,144 posts

278 months

Wednesday 20th September 2017
quotequote all
MartG said:
Laarbruch - pic of everyone on the base ( sorry, no idea of the date )

Why has the front plane got a red tail? Squadron leaders personal mount or some other reason?
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED